Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 April 29

< April 28	April 30 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Team bracket/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:TeamBracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:Team bracket/testcasesDarts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused leftovers which are no longer needed per this discussion. Gonnym (talk) 20:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, great cleanup for the updated module DLManiac (talk) 23:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSicon needed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BSicon needed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and from what I can tell can be wrapped into the calling module where appropriate. Izno (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The appropriate place to make that request is Commons:Talk:BSicon/New icons and icon requests‎‎. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 03:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Israeli English

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 7. Primefac (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Israeli_English (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nepali English

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nepali English (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no evidence that any written standard of Nepali English exists, as distinct from other varieties, and the article on the subject itself says that no one in the country can agree on a standard, so this template serves no purpose whatsoever. Furthermore, there is no evidence that anyone has written an article in such a variety. Therefore, I propose it be deleted. RGloucester — ☎ 12:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:49, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pitcairn Islands English

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pitcairn Islands English (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no identifiable written standard variety of 'Pitcairn Islands English' that exists, and certainly, no evidence that any article is written in such a variety. Therefore, I propose this template be deleted. RGloucester — ☎ 12:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:49, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Pitcairn Island has 40 people, and their descendants number in the hundreds. There is effectively zero benefit of using a specific "Pitcairn Islands" dialect on a worldwide English Wikipedia, and even if it was to be used, it would be almost impossible to figure out what this dialect is. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 20:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lao Royal Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Primefac (talk) 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lao Royal Family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two individuals are linked, leaving the template with limited usefulness. 67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Burmese Royal Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Primefac (talk) 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Burmese Royal Family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only three individuals are linked, leaving the template with limited usefulness. 67.173.23.66 (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).