Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bob Willis Trophy templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution, noting that any other uses can be transcluded directly from the article using LST. Primefac (talk) 00:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless templates, only used once, so we should subst and delete Joseph2302 (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 16:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Stellantis

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep or do not merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Fiat Chrysler Automobiles with Template:Stellantis.
On 16 January 2021, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Groupe PSA has been merged to form Stellantis. Ridwan97 (talk) 02:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Groupe PSA with Template:Stellantis.
On 16 January 2021, Groupe PSA and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has been merged to form Stellantis. Ridwan97 (talk) 02:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the World Cup is sponsored. But is looks like template creep and fancruft to me. The Banner talk 11:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to projectspace. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template probably should be substed. It was a one-time newsletter. No issue with moving it to be a subpage of the WikiProject, retargeting all using pages, and subsequently deleting the redirect. Izno (talk) 08:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 18. (non-admin closure)Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 18:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This grading scheme is transcluded on only two pages. I think it would make sense to merge it to the assessment page and then just change the category page to link to the grading scheme rather than have the scheme transcluded it in full. The other option would be to use section transclusion (as stated elsewhere, I am not a fan, but that is an option). Izno (talk) 07:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).