Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused pre-alpha module; no edits since 2014. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template for a rail line without an article. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason as {{No space joiner bold superscript middot no space non joiner}} - excessively long name for something not particularly useful (and unused). Elli (talk | contribs) 13:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; neither of the categories this template can categorize articles in exists or has ever existed. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely unused and linked to nowhere. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mongolian election data

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. See previous nomination of Template:Mongolian legislative election, 2008. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer serves a purpose for navigation as the four blue links now redirect to World Cafe (radio program)#Live at the World Cafe, due to lack of notability of the individual albums of this series. Lennart97 (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A previous version was deleted at TfD a long while ago (Wikipedia:Historical archive/Template:Substub is the historical version). The current creation misrepresents policy, saying that substub "will be deleted in 7 days". This has no basis in policy. A PROD may result in deletion in 7 days, however it is a separate process from this template and is not connected to substub status. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 12:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Awards/Archive_2#Grammy_Award_templates there was discussion about deleting this template. When this template and other Grammy Award templates were nominated at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_July_13#Non-major Grammy Awards it was deleted. Therefore, I think it should be deleted again as it was later recreated. However, there has been new content added since 2014. Currently, other Grammy Award templates from the 2014 nomination are being deleted and orphaned. Example is Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_3#Template:Grammy_Award_for_Best_Female_Pop_Vocal_Performance. Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Very little use as a navigational aid. One of many navboxes that are more "award banners" than navigational aids, cluttering up the articles, rather than aiding navigation. Nigej (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).