Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused military rank templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete as those are used only there. Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Nomination rationale is no longer valid, NPASR if there is a different reason why this template should be deleted. Primefac (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 23:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Brescia Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Ahmedabad Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only three totals links in this navbox, the other 20 links are redlinks. No objection to recreation if many of the redlinks become blue, but the template has been around for eight years with no progress on article creation. Additionally, template is redundant, as all of the blue links are also found at Template:USFL. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only four totals links in this navbox (one is a redirect to a section of an article already linked), the other 13 links are redlinks. No objection to recreation if many of the redlinks become blue, but the template has been around for eight years with no progress on article creation. Additionally, template is redundant, as all of the blue links are also found at Template:USFL. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only three totals links in this navbox, the other 16 links are redlinks. No objection to recreation if many of the redlinks become blue, but the template has been around for eight years with no progress on article creation. Additionally, template is redundant, as all of the blue links are also found at Template:USFL. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).