Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 17

< March 16	March 18 >

March 17

Template:Burger King talk page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Burger King talk page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sort of a talk page navbox. Seems to duplicate {{Burger King}} but for templates and in a different form. Nigej (talk) 06:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I created that template as the subject grew and the subjects became more diverse. People would still start conversations about subjects that had branched off from the main article and would be best covered in said daughter articles. The Burger King navbox doesn't cover talk pages and from my editing of WP, I am well aware that people will not use the navbox to navigate to the appropriate talk page as navboxes reference the articles not talk pages. This link template serves a different purpose than the navbox (articles) directing people looking to discuss the subjects of the article instead of investigating related articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerem43 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – A reasonable case for the template's creation and continued use has been made. This is sufficient to keep. And while the template partially duplicates another template, it does have features that are unique. This is a second reason to keep. Senator2029 【talk】 21:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This seems very silly. Telling editors where to go to talk about the sandwiches, which is clearly titled as Talk:Burger King breakfast sandwiches is borderline treating our editors as morons. Even more so when that page has one ever had 1 talk page comment. We don't use this style of notice for any other subject and there is really no reason to use it here. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly duplicate of the said template. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete, if I want to know all the things related to "Burger King", I would be best served by reading the article or using the navbox. we already have enough banners at the top of the talk pages. Frietjes (talk) 20:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USA imagemap with state names

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USA imagemap with state names (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USA imagemap with state names small (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No use of this template for articles except user pages. Vitaium (talk) 05:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete, replaced by {{USA image map}} and adding the "small" version to this discussion. Frietjes (talk) 20:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Usertalk notice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Usertalk notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused user talk page header. Template:User page is the one people use. Gonnym (talk) 12:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to {{talk header}} with a switch |ut=y ; Adjust the header banner to add "If you find this page anywhere except Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site, beware that that page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs is not affiliated with any mirror site. The original page is located here." to all header variants ; Modify the text of the box to apply to user pages when in ut-mode -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why merge? It is unused, no one uses this style. I oppose merging unnecessary stuff. Gonnym (talk) 11:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If merged, it would use the {{Talk header}} style, while just merging some text over. {{user page}} is for subject pages, an equivalent banner for the talk namespace would need to adapt the text in {{talk header}} which isn't appropriate for user talk space. We already have the adapted |wp=yes for WikiProject main talk pages. Some of what is in the current {{Talk header}} will work on user talk pages. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, if you advocate for merging, please familiarize with the actual code. Template:User page is also used on talk pages. Gonnym (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had assumed the documentation contained what the template was about. The documentation does not mention it is to be used in user-talk-space. That is an undocumented usecase -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete, nothing to merge. Frietjes (talk) 20:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Hundred 2022 team seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Hundred 2022 team seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Invalid template, as all redlinks. Way too soon for this template, as we would need around 5 blue links (which seems unlikely to happen until around 5-6 months time) Joseph2302 (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This template should be deleted because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Vitaium (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ussc/rewrite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ussc/rewrite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Single edit which never went anywhere 6 years later. Gonnym (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as futile. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current South African COTW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current South African COTW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:South African COTW candidate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inactive collaboration since around 2005. Gonnym (talk) 12:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as futile. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).