Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after replaced with {{YYYY in sport category header}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Club plays in third division with no signs of notable players. Unused and last updated 6 years ago. No roster in the club article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacing with Template:Infobox kabaddi league season Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was a past discussion about deleting this template, which resulted in its deletion. The template has only 9 instances of use, which can be replaced with Template:Infobox sports league. Tojoroy20 (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Redundant to {{Cat main}} and {{Navseasoncats}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does not aid navigation. Links only to main topic. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to New_South_Wales_Waratahs#Coaches. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems fine to be merged into Template:Mid-American Conference men's soccer navbox. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I know the proposal is to merge the template, but the Mid-American Conference actually stopped sponsoring soccer after this season, so there is no need for this template at all going forward. -fuzzy510 (talk) 05:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy declined back in Oct 2022. Content before blanking is more suited to be as a userpage. However, creator's userpage already exists. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Created solely for Draft:Dinaric Rally. Redundant to Template:Infobox motorsport championship. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused non-English template. No obvious use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only one active link at this time - the rest are red links, and may not be notable enough for creation. Not opposed to recreation if those pages get created later, but this is not useful in its current form. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on two pages. The template seems to reference a page which was CSD-G7'd in December, so it's hard to tell what it was in reference to (and it's not a term I'm familiar with, even being around college basketball circles). Not seeming very useful, in any case. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make you familar: the idea is before conferences, and outside the early conferences, there were still claims to regional titles, published in things such as newspapers or Spalding's "Guides" for the various sports (see the source in the 1909 Georgetown article). There are mythical regional titles just like there are mythical national titles. You can compare it with the SIAA conference list and independent football list which is much better sourced as it was a much bigger sport (one of those sources being from a man who shared your name: Fuzzy Woodruff). For example, the Spalding's Guide for basketball in 1914, in "Review of the Southern Collegiate Basketball Season" by Georgetown basketball head coach James E. Colliflower, he says "Navy, from the first to the last game on the schedule, played brillianty....Their record entitles them to be again honored with the title "Champions of the South". Navboxes like these help one navigate the best teams in the early years of the sport. I had only just started it. One can see above, Navy also had claims to 1912 and 1913 titles. In a way, it's the "ACC conference champion" list, but before that existed, i. e. South Atlantic States (as in Tidewater see SAIAA) champion, and in those days the further south you went, the newer the sport was, i. e. the earliest good southern teams are South Atlantic rather than Deep South (represented by the SIAA, these days the SEC). Hence schools like Georgetown or Navy were the best, hugging the Mason-Dixon line, playing Northern teams, etc. Not to mention, DC (home to Georgetown) even now is quite a place of basketball history. Surely you've heard of Elgin Baylor or Patrick Ewing or Wes Unseld. Cake (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note Virginia goes undefeated in 1915, but was in the SAIAA, so not independent anymore. UVA's very first team also does well, and not finding their claim yet may be why the blank before 1908 Georgetown. George Washington U another possible champion claimant in the before times. Cake (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only links to one page, the page it's used on. Serves no navigational purpose. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only links to two pages, which are also the only two pages it's used on. Useless for navigation. WP:NENAN and WP:TCREEP. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 21:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused CSS template for Template:FIFA World Cup group table sidebar. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Even more college rivalry navboxes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous discussion on April 5, these are all big violators of WP:TCREEP and WP:NENAN, and, at best, serve the most minimal navigational purpose. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to Catholic_Church_in_Vietnam#Bibliography --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Newton—North Delta federal election

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

More college rivalry navboxes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous discussion on April 5, these are all big violators of WP:TCREEP and WP:NENAN, and, at best, serve the most minimal navigational purpose. fuzzy510 (talk) 03:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Template:User in Vietnam|56}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links from discussions, relevant categories, or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).