Wikipedia:WikiProject Country music/Assessment
Country Music articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
![]() |
1 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 19 | ||
![]() |
2 | 13 | 27 | 34 | 76 | ||
![]() |
12 | 20 | 39 | 99 | 8 | 178 | |
B | 12 | 33 | 55 | 165 | 49 | 314 | |
C | 18 | 46 | 139 | 732 | 329 | 1,264 | |
Start | 9 | 39 | 230 | 2,282 | 1,754 | 4,314 | |
Stub | 6 | 63 | 1,666 | 2,766 | 4,501 | ||
List | 2 | 1 | 36 | 317 | 3 | 98 | 457 |
Category | 866 | 866 | |||||
Disambig | 5 | 5 | |||||
File | 73 | 73 | |||||
Project | 6 | 6 | |||||
Redirect | 2 | 31 | 306 | 339 | |||
Template | 1 | 625 | 626 | ||||
NA | 1 | 1 | |||||
Other | 27 | 27 | |||||
Assessed | 54 | 154 | 581 | 5,327 | 1,912 | 5,038 | 13,066 |
Unassessed | 10 | 327 | 337 | ||||
Total | 54 | 154 | 581 | 5,337 | 1,912 | 5,365 | 13,403 |
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Country Music! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Country Music related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Country Music}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Country Music articles by quality and Category:Country Music articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Country music WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
[edit]Quality assessment
[edit]An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Country music}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Country music|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Country music articles) | ![]() |
|
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Country music articles) | ![]() |
|
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Country music articles) | ![]() |
|
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Country music articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Country music articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Country music articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Country music articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Country music articles) | ![]() |
|
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Country music articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scale
[edit]The scale for assessments is defined at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. Articles are divided into the following categories.
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Johnny Cash |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | LeAnn Rimes |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Crazy (Willie Nelson song) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Country rap |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of country music performers |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:Country music songs |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Country music (disambiguation) |
File | Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. | The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. | Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. | File:Highwaymen.jpg |
Portal | Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. | Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. | Portal:Country music |
Project | All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. | Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. | Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. | Wikipedia:WikiProject Country music |
Redirect | Any redirect falls under this class. | The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. | 50 Greatest Hits (Reba McEntire album) |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Country music |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | N/A |
Importance assessment
[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Country music}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Country music articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Country music articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Country music articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Country music articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Country music articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Country music articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
[edit]The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Country Music.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Country music Bluegrass music Willie Nelson |
High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Always on My Mind Country pop Country rock |
Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | Carnival Ride Alan Jackson List of years in country music |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Country Style, USA Freight Train (album) Johnny Gimble |
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Country music |
??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | ??? |
Requesting an assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Please note that an importance rating may not be given in some cases if the reviewer is unfamiliar with the subject.
If you assess an article, please strike it off using <s>Strike-through text</s> so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Thanks!
- Caylee Hammack - I've expended the article substantially and I'd like to request a reassessment of it. --Heubergen (talk) 19:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Quality log
[edit]- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
August 18, 2024
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- F-1 Trillion (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
August 17, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Last Leaf on the Tree (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
August 16, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Bluegrass (album) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- The Border (album) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- The Willie Nelson Family (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Last Leaf on the Tree (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- VH1 Storytellers: Johnny Cash & Willie Nelson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
August 15, 2024
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- Draft:Anthony O'Neill (musician) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
August 14, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- About a Woman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- But I Got a Beer in My Hand (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Country On (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mind of a Country Boy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
August 13, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- WP:Featured topics/Lady Like renamed to WP:Good topics/Lady Like.
- WP:Featured topics/Speak Now (Taylor's Version) renamed to WP:Good topics/Speak Now (Taylor's Version).
- WP:Featured topics/Taylor Swift (album) renamed to WP:Good topics/Taylor Swift (album).
- WP:Featured topics/Taylor Swift original studio albums renamed to WP:Good topics/Taylor Swift original studio albums.
- Draft:Next to You (Loud Luxury and Dvbbs song) renamed to Next to You (Loud Luxury and Dvbbs song).
Reassessed
[edit]- About a Woman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Can I Sleep in Your Arms (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Gary Morris (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Heartland (Nelly album) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- I'm Gonna Love You Anyway (Tanya Tucker song) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- I'm Gonna Love You Anyway (Trace Adkins song) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Marie Osmond (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- Number One Christmas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Sound Emporium Studios (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- 80's Ladies (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- 9th Academy of Country Music Awards (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Am I Okay? (song) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Boys Back Home (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Buck 65 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Dylan Marlowe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Female-fronted musical groups (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:George Edgar (Music) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- WP:Good topics/Lady Like (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- WP:Good topics/Speak Now (Taylor's Version) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- WP:Good topics/Taylor Swift (album) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- WP:Good topics/Taylor Swift original studio albums (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Innocent (Taylor Swift song) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Jack Clement (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Larry Butler (producer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Malinda Lowe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mississippi Girl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Music of Nashville, Tennessee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Obsessed (Morgan Wade album) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- One Promise Too Late (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Restless Minds (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Rockin' You Tonight (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Anthony O'Neill (musician) (talk) removed.
- Draft:Chrispy (talk) removed.
- Draft:Daddy (Dolly Parton song) (talk) removed.
- Greatest Hits (Jack Greene and Jeannie Seely album) (talk) removed.