Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Commons/Drives/Jan 2012

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This drive is now closed.
January 2012 MTC Drive

January 2012 Drive

[edit]
New additions
For reviewers

Participants

[edit]

Join the drive!

  1. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
    Contribs
  2. Sven Manguard Wha?
  3. HurricaneFan25
  4. Varnent (talk)
  5. PKM (talk)
  6. RohG ??·
  7. Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail
  8. Quadell (talk)
  9. Guerillero | My Talk
  10. --DThomsen8 (talk)
  11. --Katarighe
  12. --Greg Heffley
  13. Michael Barera (talk)
  14. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email
  15. Philosopher Let us reason together.
  16.  Chzz  ► 
  17. Bulwersator (talk)
  18. Achowat (talk)
  19. Feedintm (talk)
  20. Gobonobo T C
  21. GingerSaucier
  22. Grondemar
  23. The Bushranger One ping only
  24. Andrewstalk
  25. Coffeegirlyme (talk)·
  26. mabdul
  27.  Ronhjones  (Talk)
  28. Multichill (talk)
  29. ~rAGU (talk)
  30. Aaa3-other | Talk | Contribs
  31. Jane023 (talk)
  32. — Bill william comptonTalk
  33. JaumeBG (talk)
  34. getallica (talk)
  35. SMasters (talk)
  36. Nickrds09 (Talk to me)
  37. Closeapple (talk)
  38. Scillystuff (talk)
  39. Bidgee (talk)
  40. --Ankit Maity Talkcontribs
  41. Erik gbg (talk)
  42. Moemin05 (talk)
  43. Cloudbound (talk)
  44. Clarkcj12 (talk)
  45. MorganKevinJ(talk)
  46. Krish(talk)
  47. --Braniff747SP (talk)
  48. Ramaksoud2000 (talk)
  49. Old Stump (talk)
  50. Gilderien Talk|Contribs
  51. 99of9 (talk)
  52. -- Orionisttalk
  53. MitchS2594 (talk)
  54. ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs)
  55. jlechem (talk)
  56. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done)
  57. Maxrossomachin (talk)
  58. ViswaPrabha വിശ്വപ്രഭ (talk)
  59. Questionkiddo (talk)
  60. Breawycker (talk to me!)
  61. HF Baumann (talk)
  62. FM talk to me | show contributions ] 
  63. Przemub (talk)
  64. MountainHiker (talk)
  65. Kariit iiswan (talk)
  66. Petepirate2 (talk)
  67. 68.40.166.211 (talk)
  68. UrSuS (talk)
  69. Ionutzmovie (talk)
  70. Pilif12p
  71. tblack93 Talk · Contributions · Uploads
  72. -- ТимофейЛееСуда.
  73. Vivekananda De--tAlK
  74. Johnny9040 (talk)johnny9040
  75. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 06:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Lipla (talk)
  77. Suhasini
  78. – Muboshgu (talk)

Procedures

[edit]

~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs
will chair the group. The committee will inspect files at random for quality control purposes. With the reviewing, the group will offer advice. If you are interested in participating, please sign up below. This time, we will only need 3 users which is preferably administrators.

Reviewing

[edit]

Ten percent of a participant's transfers should be inspected. Reviewers should choose images at random, and cannot inspect their own transfers.

In order for participants to get credit for their transfers, they must log them at the Logs page. To review transfers, go to the logs page and choose an entry. Make sure that the information that was on the local Wikipedia page, including source information, description information, and an upload history (if the file had more than one local version) all made it to the Commons page. Also make sure that the file should have been transferred, i.e. that it is free use by Commons' definition (which is stricter than Wikipedia's definition).

If the transfer is acceptable, mark it down using {{MtC review|status=good|comment=(Comment with signature)}}. If the transfer is not acceptable, denote that with {{MtC review|status=bad|comment=(Comment with signature)}}. Please make sure you explain why it isn't acceptable. This doesn't have to be very long, 'didn't transfer over description' or 'image isn't free use' should usually be enough. If the transfer can be fixed, the participant should be given the opportunity to fix it. After all, the objective of this drive is to get the files to Commons, so there's no point in bringing it back unless it shouldn't be on Commons. Reviewers, upon determining that a transfer is unacceptable, have the right to a) check over additional transfers made by the same participant, b) levy a penalty (the size of which is at the reviewer's discretion) from the participant's "score" in the rankings, or c) bar them from the drive. Obviously the first option is preferable to the second, which is preferable to the third, however if someone is doing a great deal of bad work, it is best for the project if they are politely asked not to perform transfers anymore. Any baring should be referred to the other reviewers for discussion. Remember that continually uploading non-free files to commons may get you blocked.

Because files are deleted locally after being transferred to commons, it is preferred that Wikipedia admins (not necessarily at Commons) be the reviewers. Non-admin reviewers should note that most local files are deleted sometime between 24 and 48 hours after being tagged with NowCommons (CSD F8), but could be deleted within minutes.

Please direct any questions to ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs
.

Advice

[edit]

Copyright is... complicated. Even many sysops can't understand the complicated parts. The reviewers may give you advice whenever, but they will not do the transfers for you. If you have any doubts on moving an file, don't hesitate to ask.

Sign up

[edit]
Non-admins
  1. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
    Contribs
  2. Sven Manguard Wha?


Admins
  1. Quadell (talk)
  2. Guerillero | My Talk

See also

[edit]

 Category:Moving files to the Commons
 Commons:WikiProject transwiki migration
 Category:CommonsHelper
 Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons