Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Karachi/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Karachi articles by quality statistics

Requesting an assessment

[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead. Please archive requests that are complete.

Please place new requests (in the format, # [[article name]] -- ~~~~ ) at the bottom of the list.

  1. National_Stadium,_Karachi, the biggest international sports venue in Karachi. -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dreamworld Resort, the biggest entertainment project in Karachi. -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Karachi_Expo_Centre, the place where the biggest exhibitions take place. -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Karachi_Stock_Exchange, the best performing stock market of the world for the year 2002 -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Economy_of_Karachi -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Education_in_Karachi -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Climate_of_Karachi -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. History_of_Karachi -- 202.70.150.18 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions

[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Karachi}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WikiProject Karachi| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Karachi articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale

[edit]


Importance scale

[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Pakistan.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

The team

[edit]

Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

  1. Taqi Haider (talk · contribs)