Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Artemisium
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result: promoted EyeSerenetalk 11:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator(s): MinisterForBadTimes (talk)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it's just passed a GA review, and I'd like to know if it is also up to the MILHIST A-class standard. I guess I'd also like to get it up to FA status if possible, so it would also be interesting to know if this would indeed be possible. Is there anything substantial missing, or would the article in its current general form be acceptable for FA?
And before anyone points it out, I know the map is not the best ever. I am still trying to work out how to use inkscape properly so that I can make a better one!
- Comments - (this version)
- One disambig needs attention Done
- Ref 1 needs to be in the bibliography. Done
- Can ref 3 be formatted like Herodotus? Done
- Ref 7 needs a page number. Done
- —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 03:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Wandalstouring (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. No major issues. Good work. One minor issue is that the article does somewhat favor the Greek Allies' POV, which is understandable since most of the sources appear to favor that side. In a situation like this I've found that it is hard to make the article balanced from the perspective of both sides, but if we're aware of the situation we can mitigate it as much as possible. Cla68 (talk) 07:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I've copyedited it for some minor stylistic errors, but it mostly looks good now. My only suggestion is to remove the See also section, because I think all of those have already been linked in the main article text. – Joe N 20:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.