Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Nimitz class aircraft carrier

Nimitz class aircraft carrier

I have been worked on this article and it is currently a GA. However, I would like further input as to how it can be improved to A class or FA. Jhbuk (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Buggie111

Sorry if this is short, but all images need alts. Buggie111 (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Buggie, you should provide links to help out the editor. What he meant was WP:ALT -MBK₀₀₄ 04:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Which ones don't? I thought I'd covered them all before I started the PR. Jhbuk (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

For some reason, eeveryone except the sidedrawing and the one in the infobox. Buggie111 (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Fixed - they were there, just not properly formatted (with alt=). Jhbuk (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Now nothing is popping up. IDK what happened, might just be my comp. Buggie111 (talk) 22:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

YellowMonkey

What makes navysite.de reliable? It is done by two students who proclaim on teh page that they are amateurs. A large % of the refs are from this site YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

There is actually very little substantial information referenced solely under the site, just things like what deployments the ships were involved in - the referencing on the table actually came from the USN at first (I think), but I didn't put the refs in at that point for some reason. I later realised this and just put the first ones I found in, which is why there is a lump of them in the middle. Would it be better to just get rid of them in general, rather than using them to support other sources. Jhbuk (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC) I think I've done. There are still a couple of refs that need some extra info, but I'll do them later. Jhbuk (talk) 19:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Is that the only reference that might need replacing? Jhbuk (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)