Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Cladogram requests/Archive 6
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Hello, can I request the cladogram from Busker et al. 2020 (fig. 10) to be coded up? Thanks in advance. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Magnatyrannus: Here it is —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think "Node A" or "Node B" on the cladogram. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trilletrollet
Note: I'd I also like to request this cladogram from Marivaux et al. 2002 as well. Again, large thanks. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Magnatyrannus: Do you want the entire cladogram or just a subgroup? —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 00:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trilletrollet: In my opinion the entire cladogram is necessary, so technically yes. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Magnatyrannus: Ok, it has been made —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trilletrollet: In my opinion the entire cladogram is necessary, so technically yes. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Magnatyrannus: Do you want the entire cladogram or just a subgroup? —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 00:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trilletrollet
- I don't think "Node A" or "Node B" on the cladogram. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyclostome phylogeny
Hi, can I request that figure 3 of https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1814794116 be coded up. Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Hemiauchenia: Here it is —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hello can I request the cladogram from Martínez et al. 2020 to be coded up (here is the image)? I'm only interested in including the taxa from Node 4. Thanks in advance. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 15:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Magnatyrannus, do you want the clades labeled as well? (eg. Homalodotheriidae, Leontiniidae) Loopy30 (talk) 23:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Loopy30 Yes, Toxodontidae, Homalodotheriidae, and Leontiniidae (Notohippidae and Isotemnidae should be marked as paraphyletic). Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
@Magnatyrannus, here is one with the three monophyletic families labeled. The two others will have to wait for now unless someone else can add them tonight. Loopy30 (talk) 01:35, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trilletrollet:, I suggest you’re able to add the paraphyletic labels, as well as Eutoxodontia? Thanks in advance. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 13:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Magnatyrannus: Done —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 14:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Toxodontia | "Isotemnidae" Paranotohippids "Isotemnidae" "Notohippidae" | |
Acheronauta
I added a cladogram to my recent article on acheronauta, a vermiform arthropod from Silurian Wisconsin.
Phylogentic position of Acheronauta in relation to other mandibulates |
Phylogenetic position of Acheronauta after Pulsipher, 2022.[1] |
here it is. I was just checking to see if it could be improved and if you guys could help me with it. There are three cladograms in the paper. I was basing this one off the second of the three, but maybe only include the mandibulata section. But if you can include all of the groups coded into the cladogram, that would be great, thanks. The link to the cladogram is this https://www-tandfonline-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/doi/figure/10.1080/14772019.2022.2109216?scroll=top&needAccess=true.
Fossiladder13 (talk) 13:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- There are some problems in that cladogram (assuming Fig 10B). I think this is the correct topology but the last two clades need completing. — Jts1882 | talk 20:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Arthropoda |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- ^ Pulsipher, M. A.; Anderson, E. P.; Wright, L. S.; Kluessendorf, J.; Mikulic, D. G.; Schiffbauer, J. D. (2022). "Description of Acheronauta gen. nov., a possible mandibulate from the Silurian Waukesha Lagerstätte, Wisconsin, USA". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 20 (1). 2109216. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2109216. S2CID 252839113.
Hello! I need a cladogram for Lutrinae for the Enhydriodon page as well as possibly future prehistoric otter pages, based on this source's Bayesian inference phylogeny (figure 13B) (Figure 13B image here; Figure 13A is a 50% majority consensus tree if that's better to use; preferably exclude lines not within Lutrinae like Martes and Galictis) and this research article's Figure 1 cladogram merged together so that it includes all extant otter species as well as the extinct otter genera (Siamogale, Enhydriodon, Vishnuonyx, Sivaonyx, etc). Thanks in advance. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- I will do it to you, but in two parts. Merging those trees is technically original research.
- Fig. 1 of Tseng, Su, Wang, White and Ji, 2017
- Next one to come shortly. Larrayal (talk) 22:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- And here is the second one, Wang *et al*, based on FA, I can produce you FB easily. I repeat myself, do not attempt to merge them, this would be WP:OR. Larrayal (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah no worries, I understand now that merging would be original research, so I will therefore not do it. Thanks! I think now that FB should be included as another figure on the page, and I'll of course mention the distinction between the two.
- PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- And here is the second one, Wang *et al*, based on FA, I can produce you FB easily. I repeat myself, do not attempt to merge them, this would be WP:OR. Larrayal (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Persea group phylogeny
Hi, can I have the cladogram from figure 4 of https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.1100006 be coded up? I would like the labelled groups to be similar to the "Harvey (1992) taxa" from the Pseudoscorpion phylogeny. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, here you go: Cougroyalty (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
|
Machias clade Alseodaphne-Dehaasia clade Persea clade Phoebe clade Alseodaphne-Persea group Outgroups | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balhuticaris
Hi, I'm trying to expand the balhuticaris article due to a more accurate restoration coming out. A cladogram would be great for helping to expand the article. There is a cladogram in the "results" section of the article. Here is the link https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(22)00947-6?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2589004222009476%3Fshowall%3Dtrue#relatedArticles. Fossiladder13 (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Here you go: Cougroyalty (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- got it, thanks Fossiladder13 (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)