Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illinois/Assessment

Importance

I see we have finally implemented importance into our assessments. As of right now, I don't know who all is watching this, but I am thinking that all FA should be High-Top importance to this project, along with all GAs being of High importance. We can discuss as we go along what else is High and Top as we go along. I am also thinking of having a bot go through and assigning Low importance to all the project articles that need assessment once I get through the 6k assessments. Sound alright?--Kranar drogin 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like thats putting the cart before the horse as a matter of policy...I'm sure someone could write an excellent article which is actually of such specialized interest that it would't qualify as Top- or High- importance. I'm not saying that the current FA, A, and GA articles aren't important, I am saying that neither importance, nor quality follows the other, and I'm not sure if codifying such a relationship is a "best practice". PreciousRoi (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, should Category-class articles have an NA-importance rating by default? I might tend to think so.PreciousRoi (talk) 17:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where to add requests

The "Requesting an Assesment" section says "feel free to list below", but the next section says not to add entries by hand. Where do I add the entries, then? I have several entries that I have made significant changes to, so where do I put them for assessment? Thanks.Ballabosh 04:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You list them under the "Requesting an Assessment" subsection. The section "Assessment Logs" is the section which is automatically generated.PreciousRoi (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]