Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-11-14/ArbCom update

It wasn't just an objection to Kelly, but to the five in total. Bureaucratic instruction creep - David Gerard 09:51, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It gets slightly more complex than that. Some people object to checkuser period, some people object to checkuser being given to the Jimbo-appointed arbiters (as opposed to community-elected arbiters) and some people object to checkuser being given to Kelly. It is left as an exercise to the reader which of these objections (if any) have good reasoning behind them. R adiant _>|< 13:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]