Talk:Abzû
Giant Squid (company) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 July 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Abzû. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Abzû has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 30, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
Hello, I put a table of the animals in Abzu up, thinking it would be interesting for people to have links to all the fish they can find, especially since it's sometimes hard to capture the fish on the "Meditate" mode. It was removed, with the reason "this is not allowed here." Could I have an explanation of why this is not allowed? Kunegund (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Read this carefully Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines#Inappropriate_content — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.135.198 (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Abzû (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
I'll take this. JAGUAR 16:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- "The origins of Abzû lay in the development of Journey, an independent video game developed by Thatgamecompany" - I think 'thatgamecompany' is stylised without a capital letter. Or at least it looks like that in the FA. Feel free to ignore
- "Nava experimented with other ocean simulation games and found they were not "fun"" - I think it's safe to lose the quotations around 'fun'
- "Unreal Engine 4 was still quite new at this time" - tad informal
- In the reception section, try mixing up the "Bob of IGN said x" formula: "Website's Bob", "Writing for Website, Bob", etc
- No dead links
I'm going to pass this outright as it already meets every aspect of the criteria. It is well written, comprehensive and engaging. All of the sources check out and are both reliable and verifiable. Amazing work here! JAGUAR 09:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Ggshdheehhe
[edit]Go — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.35.243.137 (talk) 21:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)