Talk:Child of Eden

Child of Eden has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 29, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Hi there. Inexperienced wikipedia user here. This game has just recently been announced. Little information is available at the moment but I wanted to start the article with what has been announced, with the plan to add more as more information is given. There are a fair few articles similarly placed [1]. Squogfloogle (talk) 04:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I, as a mere accountless user, am wondering why this article has been proposed for deletion at all, let alone speedy. What's the problem? Articles like Sorcery (video game) are barely any better. This page could easily meet that standard with a small amount of work. 86.158.216.107 (talk) 07:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"No evidence of notability"? What is the criteria for notability of a video game? Why has the aforementioned Amphibian Man (video game) been allowed to be remain an almost contentless stub while this one - which is actually better - is going to be deleted for its pains? It's published by Ubisoft and is one of the few games announced to be controlled by the new Kinect and Playstation Move systems, and has been noted by several several external sources. I'm sure the article will improve as more information is forthcoming. I'm going rogue and am replacing the deletion notice with the "this article may not meet the notability guidelines for products and services" template, as featured on the even less notable TERA. 86.158.216.107 (talk) 15:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel or "spiritual successor"?

Hey. What makes this a "spiritual successor" and not a sequel? The same developer/designer is presenting a gameplay extension in a continuous story extension.--98.193.142.134 (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. Originally, not enough was known regarding the game's argument and precise gameplay. Now, there is no reason to not consider it a sequel, even if it is visually different from its predecessor.Elideb (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a prequel

The plot of the game is about the evends before Rez. It tells the story of the creation of the AI that controlls Eden, the same one who you try to reboot in Rez. So the plot is in the same universe as Rez and takes place before Rez, hence a prequel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.136.122.18 (talk) 15:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected the sequel mention and merged the several places where it was said to be either a sequel or a prequel. Elideb (talk) 14:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the evidence that Child of Eden is a prequel to Rez? Kuro (talk) 07:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide

The bit at the article's end mentions a suicide possibly in conjunction with the game. I've been trying to find any mention of this anywhere in the world (it's unsourced in the article) but I can't even find rumors or an urban legend, let alone a legitimate news story. Wikipedia is the only mention of this tale. If anybody knows where this came from, I'd appreciate it. The S (talk) 08:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Child of Eden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Child of Eden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Child of Eden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this soon. ♦ jaguar 14:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After reading through the article I'm content with giving this an outright pass; it meets the GA criteria on all fronts including comprehensibility, well-written prose and good use of reliable sources. I truly couldn't find anything to raise. This is definitely a fresh GA, well done. I remember seeing this game out in the shops a lot back in the day! ♦ jaguar 20:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]