Talk:Empire Earth

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Melee weapon (3 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Julia Chang (7 participants)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (10 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Idea

I think it would be a good idea to base this off of The Legend of Zelda (series) or Air (series), since they are good articles.--Clyde (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

This section needs a lot of work. Half of it is spent making a case for a consistent decline in quality, when the differences in releases were as small as 2 or 3 percentage points. Is this within the margin of error? Does anyone know what the margin of error would be or how to determine it? Is this entire approach too subjective and trivial for what is supposed to be an encyclopedic POV? Does metacritic even provide useful information, in this context, when numerous articles and blogs by industry professional deride review score systems as useless, at best?

Moving on, the graph provided is comical, including expansions because they fit the desired trend, while leaving out the mobile full-game releases discussed in the main body because they defy it. This graphic would probably be better used as an example of how NOT to do statistical analysis. Disgreycedcat (talk) 08:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empire Earth (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614142557/http://pc.gamezone.com:80/gzreviews/r21660.htm to http://pc.gamezone.com/gzreviews/r21660.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Empire Earth which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 August 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– The series article makes more sense at the base name. Pageviews of the first game are roughly double that of the series page and every other series game, showing that people in search of the series are probably getting sent here instead first. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency per WP:NCVGDAB. This is already "codified" as the standard way. I don't see anything different in this case to warrant an exception. Pageviews are probably not relevant though. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, because it's better than than the current scheme with the utterly meaningless "(series)" disambiguation. (If, for some reason this fails, Empire Earth (series) needs to be moved to Empire Earth (video game series)...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Empire Earth (video game) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Empire Earth (video game) (temporary)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Empire Earth (video game) (temporary). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2#Empire Earth (video game) (temporary) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 04:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]