Talk:Empirical research

Philosophy: Epistemology / Science Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Philosophy of science

Merge to Empirical method

See Talk:Empirical_method#Merge. Any oppositions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuphrer (talk • contribs) 17:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since merged. -- Beland (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hypothesis

The hypothesis provided "People who study a word list while listening to vocal music will remember fewer words on a later memory test than people who study a word list in silence" is less of a hypothesis and more of a prediction. A hypothesis is about understanding the cause while a prediciton is about guessing an outcome. The root hypothesis is that the mental facility for memory is disturbed by background sounds. This can then be tested in different ways such as white noise, noise with words, instrumental sounds. Whether the subject speaks the words while studying. Background noises that interfers with properly hearing the words spoken.

As is says over at Hypothesis, A scientific hypothesis is a proposed explanation of a phenomenon. The simple predicition provided is not a proposed explaination of a phenomenon. It is a prediction of an unobserved phenomenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics is non-empirical

Thus, there is an error in the following statement: "By contrast, non-empirical evidence is subjective, depending on the observer." I would also caution against the use of the word subjective here, as it is misleading. All observation is "subjective". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodney.k.b.parker (talk • contribs) 03:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]