Talk:Japanese destroyer Nire (1944)
Appearance
Japanese destroyer Nire (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 11, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Nire (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 11:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this. Harrias talk 11:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
References
[edit]- Consistently formatted in an appropriate style (no action needed).
- What makes combinedfleet.com a reliable source?
- Run by published authors Anthony Tully and Jon Parshall.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Images
[edit]- The image license tag says "It was published before January 1, 1957.", but the publication date given in the source is 1994.
- It's either or, not both.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Eugh, my bad. I hate image licensing. Harrias talk 16:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's either or, not both.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Prose
[edit]- Can you provide a link for "Matsu class" in the Design and description.
- "The ships measured 100 meters (328 ft 1 in) overall.." It's been a while since I've reviewed one of these, is it common to omit "length"?
- "..ordered in Fiscal Year 1944 under.." No need to capitalise fiscal year.
- My source source treats it like a proper noun.
- "Nire assigned that day.." Missing "was".
- Oops.
Nothing much else from me, a small and neat article. Harrias talk 08:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Just a note that this has been on hold for over a week with no progress. Harrias talk 07:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- All good, passing now. Harrias talk 16:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles