Talk:Our Song

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Our Song article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Our Song is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Our Song is part of the Taylor Swift (album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 24, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
September 18, 2022	Featured article candidate	Promoted
September 27, 2022	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Country music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taylor Swift High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

On 23 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Our Song (Taylor Swift song) to Our Song. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Our Song (Taylor Swift song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090524180806/http://www.blender.com:80/guide/new/55348/fearless.html to http://www.blender.com/guide/new/55348/fearless.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per discussion below. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans 03:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per pageviews. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: First relist. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Songs, WikiProject Women in Music, WikiProject Country music, and WikiProject Taylor Swift have been notified of this discussion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support sure Red Slash 19:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this primarytopic takeover proposal based on recent popularity. With so many topics there, disambiguation is better. Dicklyon (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Recent popularity? "Our Song" (Anne-Marie and Niall Horan song) was released three years ago and is still not as popular as this song that was released eighteen years ago. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dicklyon. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support This subject is 18 years old. A further evaluation rather than putting forth WP:RECENTISM in the arguments is warranted. Stretching back to 3 years to compare with Our Song (Anne-Marie and Niall Horan song), the pageviews support the claim that this song is the primary topic, with Taylor Swift song hold an average daily page view of 291 vs 42 of Anne-Marie and Niall Horn's. If we look back from when the pageviews are first recorded, Taylor Swift's song has consistently garner the top page view counts, with exception of when Anne-Marie and Niall Horan released their song (which also has a downward trend).

If we look at wikinav, for July 2024, it clearly indicates that those who land on the diambiguation page at Our Song are more likely than not to click on Taylor's Swift song article link. While I don't look into the raw clickstream data as closely as what @Joy does, I am inclined to think that this would also hold for most of the months, if not all of the months. – robertsky (talk) 05:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. It's interesting, there's very little traffic - it's hard to say much with 57 views, 17 outgoing clickstreams identified, and 13 filtered. Monthly traffic shows this July to be on the lower end of interest, so I looked at the archive and the picture is largely the same:

clickstreams from Our Song for the last year

From meta:Research:Wikipedia clickstream:

clickstream-enwiki-2023-09.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 24
total: 24 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2023-10.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 36
total: 36 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2023-11.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 38
total: 38 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2023-12.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 33
total: 33 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-01.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 19
total: 19 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-02.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 22
total: 22 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-03.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 37
total: 37 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-04.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 30
total: 30 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-05.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 28
total: 28 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-06.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 21
total: 21 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-07.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 17
total: 17 to 1 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-08.tsv:

Our_Song Our_Song_(Taylor_Swift_song) link 16
total: 16 to 1 identified destinations

This looks consistent, but even at its peak we can only prove that about 1 reader a day had to find the Swift song in the list, which isn't exactly a great data point. It's clear enough that we should start with formatting a common section at the top and put that entry there, and then try to measure if that helped readers.

If we look at the incoming traffic for the same period:

clickstreams to Our Song for the last year

From meta:Research:Wikipedia clickstream:

clickstream-enwiki-2023-09.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 151
other-search Our_Song external 32
total: 183 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2023-10.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 200
other-search Our_Song external 19
total: 219 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2023-11.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 207
Taylor_Swift:_The_Eras_Tour Our_Song other 31
other-search Our_Song external 21
total: 259 to 3 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2023-12.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 204
other-search Our_Song external 26
total: 230 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-01.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 35
other-search Our_Song external 15
total: 50 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-02.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 31
other-search Our_Song external 27
total: 58 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-03.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 31
other-search Our_Song external 22
The_Eras_Tour Our_Song other 10
total: 63 to 3 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-04.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 28
other-search Our_Song external 17
other-internal Our_Song external 13
total: 58 to 3 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-05.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 32
other-search Our_Song external 23
total: 55 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-06.tsv:

other-search Our_Song external 26
other-empty Our_Song external 24
total: 50 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-07.tsv:

other-search Our_Song external 24
other-empty Our_Song external 20
total: 44 to 2 identified destinations

clickstream-enwiki-2024-08.tsv:

other-empty Our_Song external 38
other-search Our_Song external 30
total: 68 to 2 identified destinations

The biggest spikes in traffic seemed to coincide with a time when the two Eras Tour articles linked to it, which was probably fixed since? The organic traffic could all be about Swift song, or it could be scattered, there's too little of it to avoid significant filtering (anonymization thresholds). --Joy (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Monthly pageviews indicate that, except for a couple of months when the Anne-Marie and Niall Horan song had just debuted, the Taylor Swift song has consistently maintained a commanding lead over the competing titles. Further, the WP:RECENTISM claim is weak here, given that the Taylor Swift song is nearly two decades old and that it has a large pageview lead over a more recently released topic. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Recentism doesn't seem to be at play here, since the Taylor Swift song has been getting a ton of pageviews for years. This seems like an open-and-shut primary topic to me. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.