Talk:Venetica

Venetica has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 1, 2019. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Venetica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 September 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that one of the weapons in the video game Venetica was named as a result of a contest?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Venetica.

Wikipedia

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Melee weapon (3 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Julia Chang (7 participants)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (10 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Screenshots and Trailer

So far a few screenshots have been released of this game as well as a trailer. I'm going to go ahead and link them in the article under "External Links" since the official site contains none of this media. If this should be done a different way please fix. -- Cbebop007 (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Venetica/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 21:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The paragraph about bugs feels like it could be reduced in terms of examples.
I was not able to find the screenshot when I checked Deck13 Interactive, though I haven't checked Rombax Games or dtp entertainment's websites. Can you put a link onto this (as well as a link to the page with the cover art shown)?
- I took the screenshot myself ingame, so there is indeed no link for it. I don't think that's a problem though, since anyone can verify the screenshot by playing the game. I'll add a link for the cover (which was there before I worked on it). Regards SoWhy 09:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - In that case, looks good. Nice job with an interesting subject. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Abryn: Wow, thanks for the quick and helpful review! I really appreciate it! Regards So Why 16:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]