Talk:Wetrix

Wetrix has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 2, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Fair use rationale for Image:Wetrixbox.jpg

Image:Wetrixbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wetrix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this soon. ♦ jaguar 16:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

" for the Nintendo 64 personal computers in 1998" - Nintendo 64 personal computers? Is this missing a comma or an and?
- I can't believe I did not catch this one while ce this before. Anyway, done. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"and the Dreamcast Game Boy Color in 1999" - same here
- I can't believe I did not catch this one while ce this before. Anyway, done. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
" It received an 8/8/8/7 score from the Japanese magazine Famitsu Weekly" - the score is uncessecary in the lead, just condense to It received Famitsu's highest rating for a Western-developed title in years
- Fixed 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"...to commission Zed Two to develop a sequel. It was the PlayStation 2 launch title Aqua Aqua, which made little alterations to the main gameplay" - these two sentences can easily be merged to improve flow
- Good suggestion. Done 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
" Zed Two planned to have it as their first product before Vampire Circus" - might sound better as Zed Two planned release it before Vampire Circus
- Fixed 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:47, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"As Zed Two looked for publishers, however, they learned a different lesson about the state of the industry" - this sounds somewhat informal
- Changed 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"This won Zed Two a deal with Ocean to publish two games: Vampire Circus and the puzzle game" - is this referring to Wetrix?
- Yes 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"so they intended for Wetrix to be very original" - this adverb is not needed
- Will more work? 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"needed to be done quickly to pay the bills" - informal, though you can change it to pay their bills
- Changed 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
" The brothers were angry, Ste critical of how Imagineer did the water effects" - this doesn't read well
- I removed the part about the water effects. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
" Jeff Gerstmann of GameSpot bashed the earthquake mechanic " - informal
- Fixed 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Anne Royal of Computer Games Strategy Plus wrote a play-through could end in an instant if even a little bit of control of the chaos is lost" - what does this mean?
- It meant you lost the game if you screwed up a little bit. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article uses dmy and mdy dates inconsistently
- It's all European date format, given the fact that it's developer and publisher are from the European nations of the UK and France. Cites introduced in the Legacy section had American dates, so I fixed that. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I spotted numerous instances of informal language and some cases where sentences could be merged to improve flow, but nothing too major. It is comprehensive and mostly well written. I'll leave this on hold until the above issues are fixed. ♦ jaguar 17:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Jaguar: 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 22:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing them so quickly. I've read through it again and am confident it now meets the GA criteria. Well done!

♦ jaguar 00:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]