User:Majoreditor/Utilities
Majoreditor's Utilities
[edit]Citations
[edit]Refs, WP:FN | |
Template | Format |
---|---|
{{cite book}} | {{cite book | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = | publisher = | date = | location = | id = }} |
{{cite journal}} | {{cite journal | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = | journal = | volume = | issue = | pages = | publisher = | date = | id = | accessdate = }} |
{{cite news}} | {{cite news | last = | first = | coauthors = | title = | work = | pages = | language = | publisher = | date = | url = | accessdate = }} |
{{cite web}} | {{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = | work = | publisher = | date = | url = | format = | accessdate = }} |
Wiki Principles
[edit]
|
Manual of Style (MoS) |
---|
Wikipedia:Levels of competence
Information and resources for contributors
[edit]- Category:Wikipedia style guidelines
- Category:Wikipedia how-to for a full list of help topics
- Who writes Wikipedia, essential information to understand when reading articles (for new readers)
- Simplified ruleset, essential information to understand when editing articles (for new editors)
- Category:Wikipedia
- Category:Wikipedia resources for researchers
- Frequently asked questions
- Policies and guidelines for contributors
- Glossary of common Wikipedia terms
- How to write a great article
- Public domain resources
- Manual of style
- Contributing to articles outside your native language
- WikiProjects, writing and style guidelines for specific disciplines
- Resolving disputes
Edit Counters
[edit]Toolboxes
[edit]Toolbox 1
[edit]
Toolbox 2[edit]GA Review[edit]
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:
3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:
4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. 5. It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. 6. Any images it contains are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly. A lack of images does not disqualify an article from Good Article status.
Done Not done
Reporting[edit]Vandalism[edit]
Editor review[edit]A quick link to see who's on editor review so I can offer up comments. Tracking current Requests for Adminship[edit]
Signpost[edit]
Happy Holidays[edit]You got a Christmas card! → → →
Userboxes[edit]
Test Area[edit]
|
- ^ Although the entire Manual of Style should be followed, it is not completely necessary at this level.