User:Merovingian/archive-13
Bricker Amendment
[edit]Hey, Merovingian!
For some time I have been working on revisions to the Bricker Amendment article. I finally posted it and have a PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/Bricker Amendment/archive1. I'd welcome your comments. I know you won't like all those references, but I'm hoping to get it as an FA and those voters want lots of footnotes. PedanticallySpeaking 16:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Sorry it's a bit late, but welcome to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject! We're looking forward to any future edits you can make to tropical cyclones, and we're happy to have you on board. Current projects include bettering the existing articles on retired hurricanes to GA or FA status. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Here's the latest version of our monthly newsletter. Enjoy!
The Hurricane Herald
This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.
Storm of the month
![Tropical Storm Alberto near peak intensity](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Alberto_2006-06-12_1830Z.jpg/150px-Alberto_2006-06-12_1830Z.jpg)
Other tropical cyclone activity
- Tropical Depression Two-E briefly existed near the Mexican coast on June 3 to June 4 and brought heavy rainfall to Acapulco.
- Tropical Storm Jelawat lasted from June 26 to June 29 in the South China Sea and made landfall on China. The storm caused flooding which killed at least seven people.
- Tropical Storm Ewiniar formed on June 30 east of Palau. It is forecast to reach typhoon strength.
New and improved articles
- New storm articles include: Tropical Storm Alberto (2006), Typhoon Patsy (1970), Tropical Storm Larry (2003), Cyclone Steve and Hurricane Danielle (1998).
- New non-storm articles include: Subtropical ridge and List of named tropical cyclones.
- New Featured articles: Hurricane Nora (1997), List of New Jersey hurricanes, Hurricane John (1994) and Hurricane Katrina.
- Articles which became A/GA class include: Tropical Storm Allison (A), Eye (cyclone) (GA), Tropical Cyclone (GA), Project Stormfury (GA), Hurricane Lenny (GA), Hurricane Epsilon (2005) (GA), Hurricane Esther (1961) (GA), Tropical Storm Henri (2003) (GA) and Hurricane Camille (GA).
New articles and improvements wanted
- New article: List of California tropical storms and List of New Jersey hurricanes are both featured lists, so why is there no List of Louisiana hurricanes or List of Cuban hurricanes?
- The current collaboration of the fortnight is Hurricane Fifi, please help improve this article.
- Please help to expand and improve the coverage of Tropical cyclones on Wikinews.
- Improvements are requested to Hurricane Janet, Hurricane Erin (1995) and Pacific hurricane season articles.
Member of the month
![Cyclone barnstar](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Cyclone_barnstar.png/50px-Cyclone_barnstar.png)
The June member of the month is Jdorje. The WikiProject awards this to him for his many contributions to the coverage of tropical cyclones on Wikipedia. Jdorje founded the WikiProject in October 2005 and established much of the categorizations the project depends on. His most significant contributions include the Featured article 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane and his track map generator with which he has created hundreds of track maps.
Main Page content
- Hurricane Floyd appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 17.
- Entries from 5 articles: Tropical Storm Larry (2003), Tropical Storm Henri (2003), Typhoon Kate (1970), Typhoon Patsy (1970) and List of named tropical cyclones appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during June.
Storm article statistics
Grade | April | May | June | July |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
7 | 7 | 10 | 13 |
![]() |
4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
![]() |
0 | 3 | 5 | 18 |
B | 62 | 66 | 82 | 79 |
Start | 154 | 177 | 168 | 180 |
Stub | 13 | 12 | 10 | 8 |
Total | 240 | 263 | 282 | 303 |
percentage ≥Less than B |
69.6 | 71.6 | 63.1 | 62.0 |
WikiProject subpages
This is a brief description of some of the subpages of the WikiProject, explaining their purpose briefly, to find out more read the pages.
- Assessments: Provides a series of guidelines to help with the assessment and improvement of articles. Discussion of how to improve specific articles is also held here and future nominations for FAC.
- Merging: Discussion of articles which could be merged is held here. Generally for less significant topics, their articles are likely to be listed here unless very well written.
- Article requests: A list of many possible subjects for articles, with comments on the worth of an article. If you have a topic which you think should have an article, list it here.
- Collaboration: Discussion of the collaboration of the fortnight is held here. Nominate an article for WikiProject collaboration or comment on the existing nominations on this page.
- Newsletter: The content of future editions of this newsletter and selection of Member of the month are discussed here.
- Other topics not relating to a specific article are handled on the main WikiProject talk page.
Thanks to Hurricanehink to maintaining the stats table and producing the storm summaries. Nilfanion (talk)
Here's some pointers to making a good tropical cyclone article. Dear Tropical cyclone editor,
As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.
- Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
- Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
- Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexible, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
- Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
- Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
- Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
- Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
- Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.
Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.
--Hurricanehink (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thank you for your kind welcome. Bye. --Cloj 14:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia in malagasy
[edit]Hi,
I'm trying to provide some background tasks on mg: but as I'm not admin there I have to ask for help :)
If you have a moment, can you please:
- delete m==Bricker Amendment==
You were kind enough to comment on my peer review request for my article on the Bricker Amendment. I have now proposed it as a featured article and would appreciate your vote here. PedanticallySpeaking 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)ost of the 0 byte-length pages that are tagged as to be deleted (check their history)
- unlock the mg:Category:Sakafo page
- if you have more spare time, add one of the mg:Template:Babel-1..-6 to your mg: user page :)
Many thanks in advance for your help,
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your kind help and your quick answer. Best regards,
- -- AlNo (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- May I ask you to unprotect those pages too: mg:Wikipedia:Mpandrindra and mg:Category:Mpandrindra? They are the local admin pages and nobody can ask for sysop rights nor vote... (you may also want to have a look at mg:Special:Log&type=protect).
- I'm planning to request sysop status on mg: so that I won't disturb you any more after that :)
- Thanx again,
- -- AlNo (talk) 08:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reaching me. Little by little, I'm getting better at this Wikipedia thang. I hope I'm doing alright. Take care. Paz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberpuke (talk • contribs)
Ryan,
There have been several vandalism edits to the article by 12.156.192.131 and 68.166.70.117. 12.156.192.131 has made a few constructive edits and vandalism edits to several articles. What actions are appropriate other than reverting the vandalism? Thanks. Leaders100 17:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your guidance. Leaders100 04:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thank you kindly for the blanking revert on my userpage. Regards -- Banes 17:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Template Substitution
[edit]hey, I just wanted to tell you that my bot has been substing a lot of your welcome templates. Welcome templates should probably always be subst'ed. Regards, Alphachimp talk 05:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
To my dear Ryan
[edit]![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For always attaching nothing but kindness and beauty to your name, my dearest Ryan, I am in desperate need of thanking you. Here's to an awesome person with a great heart and a bright spirit, whom I am honored to call a friend. -- Phædriel ♥ tell me - 00:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC) |
I hope you're doing fine, hun. Have a great weekend, my dear Ryan! :) Big hugs, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 00:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Your input requested
[edit]Please come to Encyclopædia Dramatica to help vote in the deletion--Fùnciŏnar22:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Administrators open to recall
[edit]You have listed yourself as an adminstrator open to recall. I would like to request that such a question be opened. Thank you. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that I retracted this request which was then reinserted by Merovingian. Hipocrite - «Talk» 21:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Votes
[edit]- I vote Refridgerator. On account of it being a nonsensical thing to comment on at this point. --Darkfred Talk to me 22:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
"why is the link to Jimbo's userpage treated as an external link?"
[edit]Hi. You ask the above question in relation to a protection message on the deleted Brian Peppers article. That's a good question. One answer that occurs to me is that this text will appear on many mirrors and so it's better that the link should go directly to the Jimbo page on enwiki than to some mirror. --Tony Sidaway 21:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Pro-skubbers unite!
[edit]Heh, I take it you like PBF? I just came across you in the Soundtrack of Wikipedians and thought "Hey, I haven't seen Merv in a while". Will (Take me down to the Paradise City) 09:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
emily's parents?
[edit]didn't know if you had noticed this,but after Emily reappears, what happened to her parents ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JediRohan84 (talk • contribs)
Un-Protection
[edit]Can you please unprotect User:Daniel.Bryant/GraalOnline, as I'm ready to give my mediation statement. Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant (Talk) 00:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
You were kind enough to comment on my peer review request for my article on the Bricker Amendment. I have now proposed it as a featured article and would appreciate your vote here. PedanticallySpeaking 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
soulseek userbox
[edit]Hiya. Ive just created a new (and better, imo) userbox for soulseek and i thought is share it. you can look at it here. this new box allows you to share your soulseek username in the box itself. also, it adds your userpage to a category called "soulseek users". if you dont like the box but you want to be in the catergory just add [[Category: Soulseek users]]. anyhoo, just thought id let you know. -(chubbstar) — talk | contrib | 06:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey! Could you tell me your sources for the Lytir article? Haukur 15:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to the Birthday Committee!
[edit]Thanks for joining. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. Mr. Turcottetalk 03:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
FLCL
[edit]As a userbox fan of FLCL, would you be willing to vote for its nomination at Wikipedia's Article Improvement Drive? If elected, it will be the subject of a week-long overhaul, in an attempt to pass in to Featured Article status! Thanks, Litefantastic 16:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
extremely heated RfC, possible personal attacks by subject
[edit]Would you mind taking a look at this RfC? The talk page is getting absurdly heated, with the subject of the RfC and an admin apparently trying to discredit what appears to be a valid Outside View by painting the poster--in the words of the subject of the RfC--as "gutter trash". The RFC subject is also throwing wild accusations of sockpuppetry at everyone in support of the RfC to discredit them, I suppose. rootology (T) 20:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
image licence?
[edit]Hi, could you please indicate licence, author and source for ? Thanks! -- 23:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! -- 22:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Redirecting
[edit]Hi, knowing that you are a Wiki expert, I have a question for you. How do you set articles so that certain words put into the search box will automatically go to that article? Thanks for your help! --Martin925 21:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Hatfield Forest
[edit]Deletion for copyright violation - A bit harsh, surely? Yes, the material was lifted from another source, but I had altered it to context? ElectricRay 06:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- thanks for your message - yes, I was planning on working on it further. What happened was I was putting a list of Ancient Woodlands in the ancient woodland article, and I added Hatfield as I know it is an ancient woodland, then noticed (to my amazement, seeing as it's a pretty important historical and ecological site in the UK) that there's no article about it at all. I just wanted to put something as a stub for now, and I'll come back and augment it - add photos and more text as I did with Highgate Wood and Queen's Wood. ElectricRay 09:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. ElectricRay 15:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Your help with a problem requested
[edit]Merovingian, if you could weigh in on a sleepy page on Governor Haley Barbour it'd be great. There's currently a problem with one editor who logs in under a different IP or account every few days to replace a neutral, sourced section with his own POV. --Alsayid 16:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merovingian, the same editor has taken his battle to the CofCC page, where he has been reverting everyone's edits back to the same non-nuetral text he has been trying to insert on the Barbour page, along with issuing some nasty personal remarks there as well. Could you please help us at that page, too? --Alsayid 14:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
August Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Than you
[edit]Thank you. John Barley 08:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Would you be so kind as to go to the discussion about the Islamic Wikiproject Award? This has been a proposal that has lingered for donkey's yonks. I think the image is acceptable as a WP:PUA, but don't think the image is in line with most of the images at Wikipedia:Wikiproject awards. The design is not well supported, and right before I was going to archive the debate for lack of support, someone else moved it to the Wikiproject awards page.
The current discussion is going on here: Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals/New_Proposals#Another_image. Your input is appreciated. --evrik 10:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Pat Kingsley
[edit]My point with Pat Kingsley isn't that firing her made Tom Cruise go insane, but that she was able to coach him and keep these kinds of things from coming out to damage his career. As soon as he got away from her advising him, he started acting in a way that was not beneficial to his public image, something that was probably the real him, but not something she would have otherwise let him do. -Insomniac By Choice
Kingsley continued
[edit]This is all the digging I did.
Mentions that he became more open after dumping her: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/6420217/the_passion_of_the_cruise
A blog: http://blogs.indiewire.com/eug/archives/004089.html
which quotes from this, but I can't see it:
But the below I think has the best perspective: http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,1499693,00.html
In recent months he has revealed more of himself than ever before. For nearly two decades he was represented by Pat Kingsley, the bulldog of the trade, who prevented access to journalists except under strict conditions and, presumably, advised Cruise on what he should or should not say to the press. Under Kingsley's careful control, Cruise said very little.
But earlier this year, Cruise dumped Kingsley in favour of his sister, Lee Anne DeVette (a fellow Scientologist) and she is now handling his public affairs. Many now blame DeVette for failing to stop Cruise from going on his romance/Scientology fling. It was DeVette who orchestrated a press-call for Cruise and Holmes in Rome. And it was DeVette who ruled journalists and studio executives must take a four-hour tour of the Scientology Centre in LA before meeting with the actor.
Anyway, I do think there's more than enough to warrant mention that once he got out of her tightly controlled public image, he started talking about Scientology a lot more (since his all-Scientology family began representing him) and has pretty much destroyed the All-American image he had all of those years under Kingsley. -Insomniac By Choice
- You seemed to be the one who was skeptical and concerned about the proper tone before, so I figured you'd want to take the information and format it correctly. -Insomniac By Choice
- Moved from Talk:Main Page
Hi Mero,
I've tagged some of the images that you uploaded on mg: as they do not have any info about the relevent license. I've also deleted duplicate images that are already on commons:.
Please could you have a look at the image list and add the information that is needed (obviously your computer image is from you for example, you may want to upload it on commons as well)?.
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)