User talk:2008 Dodge Ram

Hello, Ee2mba, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 05:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ford Focus Active (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need at least 3 (ideally 5) secondary, independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ford Focus Active and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ford Focus Active, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ee2mba! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Ford Focus Active

Hello I dream of horses, Thank you for your feedback on my proposed article. Can you please advise how I can improve the article? Do I need more sources or are the current sources not cited correctly? This is my first article, so please provide some guidance.

Regards, Ee2mba (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need more sources that are reliable, secondary sources that significantly mention the topic. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 16:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ford Focus Active has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ford Focus Active. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ford Focus Active (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ford Focus Active. An article previously existed on Ford Focus Active and was stubbed down to a redirect at AFD. In order to accept an article at this time, the submitter should, at a minimum, obtain the deleted article for comparison via Requests for Undeletion, or, better, request Deletion Review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ford Focus Active and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ford Focus Active, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Acura vehicles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Acura vehicles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Ee2mba! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercedes-Benz M-Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luxury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kia Soul. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop posting the same image in the main Infobox, as it is already being used in the third generation section and the picture quality is not good enough to mainly represent the article Areaseven (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hyundai Elantra, you may be blocked from editing. If you're suggesting that older generations of the car are still in production, you really need to explain that on the talk page and provide some solid sources to back that claim up. —C.Fred (talk) 00:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Acura vehicles has been accepted

List of Acura vehicles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 23:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Thomas & Friends railway engines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have watched these episodes on YouTube.com

Cadillac Celestiq moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cadillac Celestiq, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 03:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cadillac Lyriq moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cadillac Lyriq, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 03:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebecca (Thomas & Friends

The article Rebecca (Thomas & Friends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:FANCRUFT: Non-notable newly introduced fictional character who doesn't need to be covered in their own article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Passenger pigeon (talk) 00:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article because, the other members of the Steam team have their own articles. Duck, Donald and Douglas, and Oliver also have pages despite being recurring characters.

Those characters were all present in the original Railway Series books and have an established role; none of the new characters have their own articles. Passenger pigeon (talk) 00:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about Emily?

Emily is also considered an established character despite having been introduced in the TV series. Passenger pigeon (talk) 00:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fine!

List of Soueast vehicles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Soueast vehicles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 15:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cadillac Lyriq has been accepted

Cadillac Lyriq, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve GM M platform (1985)

Hello, Ee2mba,

Thank you for creating GM M platform (1985).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 19:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ford C2 platform moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ford C2 platform, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 21:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeep Grand Cherokee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CUV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Saturn vehicles

Hello, Ee2mba,

Thank you for creating List of Saturn vehicles.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references; the requirements are the same for list articles as other articles, see WP:SourceList.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ee2mba

Thank you for creating List of Genesis vehicles.

User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add sources per WP:SourceList

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Genesis vehicles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Genesis vehicles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 15:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyundai Santa Fe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compact.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP sockpuppetry

Given that you've been caught previously editing while logged out to avoid being sanctioned for edit warring and other disruption, you should know better than to attempt it again. --Sable232 (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sable232: That is because, I was using a different computer and I forgot to log in. I will remember next time though. Ee2mba (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Dodge Durango

Despite the first-gen being built on the platform of the mid-size Dodge Dakota, it's noticeably bigger the Ford Explorer or Chevrolet S-10 Blazer. And fundamentally, the Durango is meant to compete with the Expedition and Tahoe. And at the time, Explorers lacked the third-row seating, that was not added until 2002. And S-10 Blazers never got third-row seating.

As for the current-gen, it is clearly bigger than the Explorer, new Blazer, and outgoing Journey, and even though it's unibody, it's not a crossover. Just like the BMW X7 and Range Rover, it's built on its own dedicated platform, as opposed to a truck platform like the Expedition or Tahoe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.57.183.127 (talk) 16:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. But, the thing is, the Explorer and Blazer were based on compact trucks and that is the reason the Durango is larger. The third gen Explorer is almost identical in size to the 1998-03 Durango. The Durango had 5-7 seats. The 98-03 is just like the Trailblazer EXT and Explorer (3 row). Same with the Commander. The third gen Dakota shared a platform with the Ram. The third gen Durango is similar in size to the GLE Class. Just stop. And also, I think I found that FCA website you were talking about. But, can you please stop removing references. Ee2mba (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, as log as you stop calling it a crossover, and on the page, it says (DN; 1997), not (DN; 1998). Then again, the GLS-Class, as well as every GM full-size SUV produced prior to 2015, has only 5-7 seats too. The Durango, wether it's the first-gen from 1998 to 2003, the second-gen from 2004 to 2009, or the current-gen from 2011 onwards, you could say it is indeed full-size.

Blocked for edit warring

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Woody (talk) 14:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Woody: An IP was removing 4 references and I am only fighting it. Ee2mba (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were just partially blocked for edit warring. And now you're edit warring with me on Kamala Harris? I recommend you self revert, or else Woody may reconsider making it only a "partial" block. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu: Harris’s looks much better in that image. And tell me this, if Harris becomes VP then, will you use her 2021 office portrait or her 2017 one? Ee2mba (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just told you that the standard for politicians is to use their most recent official headshot. She is not a car. People age. Whenever she gets a new portrait, as VP or Senator, it will replace the current one. The process of WP:BRD is not BRR. If you are reverted, you should discuss. It is disappointing that you were just blocked for edit warring yesterday and are engaging in the same behavior. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu: Fine Ee2mba (talk) 23:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of page restrictions on Kamala Harris

Hello Ee2mba. Kamala Harris is presently under page restrictions, including that If an edit you make is reverted you must discuss on the talk page and wait 24 hours before reinstating your edit.. Your edit today at 23:30 was reverted, and you reinstated it only three minutes later without any attempt to discuss. This is a violation of the page restriction. The restriction states that [i]f you breach the restriction on this page, you may be blocked or otherwise sanctioned. Please self-revert immediately to avoid this outcome. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ford Focus Active

Hello, 2007DodgeRam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ford Focus Active".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Soueast vehicles

Hello, 2007DodgeRam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Soueast vehicles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cadillac Celestiq

Hello, 2007DodgeRam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cadillac Celestiq".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Genesis vehicles

Hello, 2007DodgeRam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Genesis vehicles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Thomas & Friends (series 25)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Thomas & Friends (series 25). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 18#Thomas & Friends (series 25) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Eye snore 02:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Your recent edits to Dodge Durango could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Vossanova ^o< 22:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vossanova: Oh my god I was just joking. Why can’t people sometimes know when it is a joke??? 2007DodgeRam (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hi 2007DodgeRam, I'm Vanamonde93. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Vanamonde (Talk) 00:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC) I appreciate that you've put some thought and effort into creating a humorous biography. However, it's best to do so in a way that doesn't divulge genuine personal information. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can reveal whatever I want 2007DodgeRam (talk) 03:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that's not correct. We have policies in place specifically to protect younger editors. Please do not reinstate the content I redacted. Happy editing, Vanamonde (Talk) 20:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. --Sable232 (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BMW X5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luxury. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of General Motors M platform (1985)

The article General Motors M platform (1985) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources can be found to back up the assertion that this was ever called the "M platform" by GM. "M" is the VIN code for these vans, but GM used a separate VIN system for their truck lines so there is no correlation between a letter in the VIN and a platform code.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sable232 (talk) 17:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sable232:I understand. Idk what went through when creating that page. I think it would be better off being merged into Chevrolet Astro. 2008 Dodge Ram (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merging would be a bad idea, as there isn't any unique content to merge, and the title is erroneous so it shouldn't exist even as a redirect. --Sable232 (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok 2008 Dodge Ram (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 2008 Dodge Ram. Thank you for your work on Kia K4 (2025). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:2008 Dodge Ram/Presidential Transition of Kamala Harris

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:2008 Dodge Ram/Presidential Transition of Kamala Harris, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Walsh90210 (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I meant to make this a sandbox page - 2008 Dodge Ram (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

If you don't know what you're doing, don't move a page. Ever. Page moves are almost never time-critical, so flying in to move BrightDrop Zevo to Chevrolet BrightDrop immediately after GM's announcement just made a mess since you unchecked the "Move associated talk page" box. There will probably never be a reason for you to not move a talk page along with its article. Next time, please start a move discussion on the talk page instead. --Sable232 (talk) 15:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sable232I sincerely apologize for the mess made. Moving forward I will try to do it with more attention. Thank you 2008 Dodge Ram (talk) 22:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]