User talk:Afaber012/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Jerry Grote & the Colt 45s
I brought up a debate concerning Jerry Grote and the Colt 45s at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball. I'd like your input on the topic.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 00:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the sort of canvassing you've done in this is entirely appropriate. I don't have a problem with raising the debate to the WT:BASEBALL page, but then putting a note on my talk page? I've not editted or otherwise shown interest in the topic or in related articles. Yes I'm a member of the project and have contributed to discussions, but don't you think if I'm likely to have an opinion that I think is worth expressing on it, that I'm likely to be watching the project's talk page already, and so I don't need the personalised invitation. Given the specifity of the debate, I shouldn't be invited to it. Afaber012 (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- No intention to be inappropriate. I raised a debate, and sent a bunch of Wikipedia's baseball fans messages saying that I did.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Heyo! Could you stop by in an hour or so? Nearly done adding ABs finally! Staxringold talkcontribs 02:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- No worries. I've just had a quick look and I think its looking good. I did fix up a couple of minor things I noticed: the 2000 AL runner up column only had the #HR once but two sets of ABs, and I got the sorting for the NL table done as well. I'm happy to sign off on it being FL once the last of the ABs are done. Afaber012 (talk) 03:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Claxton Shield PR
Yes, that is much more clear. I did some minor copyediting this time around. Please revert anything you don't agree with. I have a question about this sentence: "It varied from the 2009 Claxton Shield by expanding the season to include ten rounds." Would it be helpful to add how many rounds the 2009 season involved? Finetooth (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Afaber012, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Afaber012/Sandbox/Newsletter. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png/130px-Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2010 Claxton Shield
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2010 Claxton Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. –Grondemar 19:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- I just posted my review for the article and placed it
on hold pending addressing of my concerns. Sorry for taking so long. –Grondemar 05:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, are you still working on this? The article has been on hold for nearly a month now and hasn't been edited since July 11. –Grondemar 13:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- I re-reviewed and
passed the article as a good article. Congratulations! –Grondemar 02:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- I re-reviewed and
- Hi, are you still working on this? The article has been on hold for nearly a month now and hasn't been edited since July 11. –Grondemar 13:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Info box
Hey there, do we have an info box for Australian baseball representatives? Thanks, Spy007au (talk) 01:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- To my knowledge, the only infoboxes for people to do with baseball is the Major Leaguers one, and possibly minor leagues, etc. I don't know about one for Australian players, either as people who have represented Australia at Olympics/World Cups/WBCs, or as players in ABL/Claxton Shield. But now that you've prodded me to think about it, we probably should have one. Afaber012 (talk) 07:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I agree, we should have one for Australian representatives. Dan027 is very good at engineering these. Suggest the info box includes, Olympics/World Cups/WBCs and friendlies, as well as ABL & Claxton Shield. Do you want to ask Dan027? Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 22:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello
I want to bring up something that has been troubling me. On the GA nominations page, the Copa Libertadores page has been ignored for a pretty long time while the main reviewers perform reviews and other subjects. I don't want to sound like a nag but other nominees (which are about a week old) have been taken faster than my nomination.
Since this is a mass message to the most frequent reviewers (I only counted four main reviewers), could you at least tell me if an article needs to be a GA before nominating it to become a FA? Or at least point me to a reviewer that could review my nomination? Thanks.
Jamen Somasu (talk) 13:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Melbourne Aces
Looks like they've got some basic stuff up, hopefully every team should be officially announced by the end of the week, it's a shame just about everyone knows the names by now. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 00:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Brisbane Bandits page is now half up. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 04:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Ahem
New FAQ page. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 11:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
DYK problem
Hello! Your submission of Australian Baseball League at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 21:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Southern Cross Pitch, August 2010
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 4 – August 2010 | |
The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since the last edition:
|
|
Afaber012 (talk) 21:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Category:Australian Baseball League
I posted a comment at Talk:Australian Baseball League, re possibility of a second category, to avoid confusion between the old and current ABL's. Thanks for the newsletter. Congrats on the new ABL! Eagle4000 (talk) 04:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Australian Baseball League
![]() | On 21 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Australian Baseball League, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Knowsley Road photographs
The first play-off game at Knowsley Road could be the last game to be played there. It's looking likely that not that many more games will be played at Knowsley Road, Belle Vue, the Willows or Wheldon Road and we have very few free-to-use images of them (although the ones we have, particularly of Wheldon Road are very good). I wouldn't like to see our material on these historic grounds go the same way as the very limited material we have for the historic Boulevard Ground, Thrum Hall or the Parkside Ground. If you will be at the next play-off game at Knowsely Road or if you are able to get any pictures of these grounds I would be very gratefull if you could upload them to commons. I can sort out the categories and such if you don't have any time. Alternatively if you know of anyone who could it would be much appreciated. I am unlikely to go to any away games next season because of my current circumstances so will not be able to contribute towards this, although I shall endevour to get some great images at home games (I've a load of the CC final to upload but there sat it a very long backlog).
Kind Regards, Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I would say that is a little rude saying that the messaging was worse than spam. I did not send it indiscriminately but to users who were in the category of rugby league fans and users who had made many edits to any of the above articles recently. The fact that you are in Australia was unknown to me, not that it makes the question all that impertinent. In live in Yorkshire but have images of Portugal and the Netherlands to add. Mtaylor848 (talk) 10:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said... actually I didn't say it but it fits: indiscriminate. If you used people in Category:Wikipedian rugby league fans, why didn't you contact another 100+ people? If you contacted people "who had made many edits to any of the above articles recently", why the hell did you contact me? I haven't heard of any of the places you mentioned above, let alone edited any of their articles, let alone made "many" edits "recently". If you'd posted at WP:RL instead, where there are a great many people actively working on and have interest in rugby league articles, you'd have reached not only a larger audience with a single post but an audience more likely to have either the resources you were looking for or the ability to source them. Afaber012 (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Template:Linescore2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Linescore. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just a note, I've reverted your last revision in attempting to do the merge, it completely broke all extra inning game tables. Staxringold talkcontribs 01:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick fix! Staxringold talkcontribs 01:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'd already realised the problem when I saw your message, and had started the fix. Bit of a whoops, but its fixed now. Afaber012 (talk) 01:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Can I ask, what's with the "Pitcher of Record" and "Home run" header thingies? Looks WAY clunkier, almost doubles the size of the template. Why change what wasn't broken? Staxringold talkcontribs 03:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- I liked the look of it when I set it up. No real reason for it. I've gotten rid of them now. Afaber012 (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Melbourne Aces Roster
Hi
I spent some time filling in the Melbourne Aces roster 2010-11, then a user Special Cases has undone my work (without citing why) and apparently given me a 'level 1 warning' (without citing why). Do you have any idea as to why this is the case? I referenced all material appropriately, and the rosters I have filled in for Sydney and Canberra haven't been removed...
I asked politely why on his talk page, and it was removed within minutes.
I'd like to know why as I am hesitant to contribute further if my work is simply going to be rejected. If I am apparently doing something wrong it's best for all parties if I am notified of WHAT I have done wrong, and HOW I can avoid the mistake.
Thanks --Qwertyqwas (talk) 08:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not sure why he did that. For some reason he thought you were testing something, and that's not supposed to be done in articles/templates/etc where readers can see. It looks like he was using a program that at least semi-automates checking articles for vandalism and other inappropriate things, and presumably it popped your changes up as a false positive.
- I've reverted it, and updated it so all the flags are shown now. (I did a google search on the names using "<name> site:baseball.com.au" and they all came up as players from local leagues, hence the Aussie flags.) I've got to admit that I was going to remove the flags when you put them in the Blue Sox' roster, as there'd been a discussion about putting flags in the MLB roster templates that decided against it, but after seeing the Cavalry's lineup the flags seem appropriate to me. Afaber012 (talk) 10:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Southern Cross Pitch, November 2010
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 5 – November 2010 | |
The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since the last edition: Australia national baseball team at the Summer Olympics & 2010 Claxton Shield finals series Australia at the Baseball World Cup
|
|
Afaber012 (talk) 22:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Kit body aus bb home.png
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Kit body aus bb home.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
ABL linescores & stats
Well done on updating the ABL linescores and stats so far! I just spent a good two and a half hours updating it; I doubt it takes you that long though. Hopefully next time I do it, it shouldn't take that long as I'll have a good idea of what needs to be done. Qwertyqwas (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've had a bit of practice, with previous Claxton Shields, World Cups and the couple of Aussie national team pages. :) These are nice box scores to work off though - a lot of the ones I've worked off from years gone by make you work to find the details to put in, especially for things like the number of home runs/wins/losses/saves for the tournament. These ones give it to you on a silver platter! Afaber012 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
The small barnstar, for gnomish work
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This barnstar is for quickly finding a reference for 1997–98 Australian Baseball League season and working to improve the entire run of Season articles. GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC) |
Template:2009 Perth Heat roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Oeltjen
Why did you change all the dates in the Trent Oeljen article? All other Major League player articles use the other date style... it makes no sense to change them. Spanneraol (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Because according to WP:STRONGNAT, an article with strong national ties to a particular English-speaking country should use the common date format of that country. If just being Australian isn't a strong enough tie, he's represented Australia at top level international baseball tournaments including the World Cup and WBC, which made him notable and worthy of his own article on Wikipedia prior to his first MLB appearance. Afaber012 (talk) 22:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Southern Cross Pitch, January 2011
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 6 – January 2011 | |
The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since the last edition: |
|
Afaber012 (talk) 01:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Talkpage
Can you believe the tripe I just got from a certain user on my talk page? JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 02:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Wow. Well, you did delete a reference to a woman, so it seems obvious that it comes from your deep-seated resentment of women! Does seem a bit of an over-reaction. I mean, sure ask the question about why it gets deleted, but to go that far? Afaber012 (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Claxton Shield
Hey there, I'm not sure exactly how to do this, so are you able to link Northern Territory into the Claxton Shield Championships table? Thanks, Spy007au (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you meant the {{Claxton Shield results}} template? If that's the case its done now - I set up a redirect to the Buffaloes page. While I was there, I did the same for the ACT to Australia Provincial. Afaber012 (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent, thanks. Spy007au (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Template:2009 Perth Heat roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 02:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 23:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Congrats!
|
The Multiple Barnstar | |||||||
For your hard work on 2010–11 Australian Baseball League season and on its promotion to good article — KV5 • Talk • 22:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
![]() | This user helped promote 2010–11 Australian Baseball League season to good article status. |
Cheers! — KV5 • Talk • 22:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Southern Cross Pitch, May 2011
THE SOUTHERN CROSS PITCH The Australian Baseball Task Force Newsletter Issue 7 – May 2011] | |
The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since the last edition: |
|
Afaber012 (talk) 07:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Melbourne Aces
Hi, obviously im not a wiki nerd, and just wanted to see the Melbourne Aces page in the same style as the MLB teams, that show both the Logo and the Cap insignia. Im very offended that you called my updates "vandalism". Can you then change the style to show both on all the ABL info boxes. As the logo isnt the same as the cap design in every team. I feel that this is a productive step towards a more informative ABL info box.
- yeh ill let you do that, im not wasting another 2 hours trying to make it better, only to have it called vandalism.
BG29 (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
List of Major League players from Australia
Don't want to touch your baby too much, so I thought I'd just suggest here something about Kevin Jordan (baseball) being an Australian citizen when he was in the majors, but not when he debuted. Similar to like on Flintoff & Dunn. Quietly as well, he's the new manager for the Bandits this season. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 16:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- First, I wasn't ignoring you, I was unexpectedly without a computer for a while, so haven't been able to contribute. Luckily there weren't any more issues brought up with the list and it's passed.
- I was thinking about mentioning him somewhere, but I couldn't find anywhere else that considered him to be on the list. The ABF seems to agree about which number Aussie we're up to. The other part was that the list's scope was set out as players born in Australia or who have represented Australia in international competition - that way they've "declared" their sporting nationality. I don't know if he's a dual citizen or not, or if he ever made an announcement to the effect of wanting to play for Australia. Afaber012 (talk) 20:38, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Almost forgot to thank you for the barnstar. It's not why I edit, but it is nice to get some recognition every once in a while. :-) Giants2008 (27 and counting) 15:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Triple Crown jewels
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Triplecrown.jpg/250px-Triplecrown.jpg)
![]() | This user has a Triple Crown. |
Question
I just undertook a revamping of Hitting for the cycle and split the list of players out from the article discussing the event in hopes of obtaining a more worldwide view of hitting for the cycle. Do you have any information on cycles hit in the top-level Australian leagues? There's a section for "other national leagues" right now that has to be hidden because I have no info. If you do, feel free to add! Cheers! — KV5 • Talk • 13:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not, or at least not in a way that is easily available. I can tell you that one potential source of info seems to indicate that it hasn't happened in the new ABL, but it'll take a more thorough search of other sources to be certain of that. In terms of the previous leagues and tournaments, there probably won't be a complete listing available, where examples of it happening - if it has - being stumbled across when looking for other stuff. I'll keep an eye out though. Afaber012 (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK sounds good. Keep me posted. Cheers. — KV5 • Talk • 11:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
medal type
Hi Afaber012, thanks for fixing the third place tie in the baseball world cup tournament box. Any reason why you also changed the medal type back to 'world cup'? I think the 'world minor' type looks better as the colors come out more. Zwart (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. I set the template up a while ago and have used that type of fix for a couple of scenarios in the past where there were ties. (I think it was some of the Asian Championships but I'm not too sure.)
- When I created the template, I had found the different types of medal icons, and me being the somewhat "everything must be organised and color coded" type of nerd, decided to use them with distinct purposes. The reality is that its purely my decision from however long ago, but to my knowledge when the template has been used the medal type has been applied consistently; other world cups with that template also use the coloured globe version. I made the change for that consistency reason. I don't mind if the coloured globe versions get pulled and the plain gold/silver/bronze world versions get used instead, but I think if its done it should be done across the board: change the template rather than just the one article. Afaber012 (talk) 07:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK thanks for the explanation. I agree that we should aim for consistency. I did use the minor medal type in the table at the end of the article. Let's keep them both as they are. Zwart (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Afaber012/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
Page request
Hi, We are a Baseball Club on the Gold Coast. Can we request a page to be created...new to wikipedia. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coomeracubs (talk • contribs) 00:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- From what I can see of the club (I'm assuming its the club at www.coomera.baseball.com.au) at the moment I would have to say no for a couple of reasons. One is that given the time I have available to me, I concentrate on the topics I'm familiar with. The second is that from what I can see from a quick googling of the club's name, I don't think it qualifies as a "notable" topic. By that I mean that there is a general notability guidleine that says the topic of an article should have "... received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject ...", which my very quick search didn't find. A more baseball-specific guideline also exists at the baseball notability guideline, which though not a definitive measurement of notability, gives a list of criteria that is used to work out which topics are expected to meet the general guideline. In terms of teams and clubs, it cuts off at the national level.
- I appreciate the request, but I think that even if I were in a position to create the article, it'd likely be nominated to be deleted for the above reasons. I'm curious though how you came to me to make the request. For future reference, I'm one of many editors, and am part of a group called the Australian baseball task force, which itself is part of the Baseball WikiProject. If you have questions, comments, concerns, etc about baseball topics, posting at their talk pages can reach many users at once. Afaber012 (talk) 08:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Minor club that doesn't even play in the top tier of the Greater Brisbane League. About as notable as the Bite Brigade :p JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 17:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)