User talk:Akcvtt

Welcome!

Hello, Akcvtt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Orphaned non-free image (File:AshleyTisdaleOverrated2.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AshleyTisdaleOverrated2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Desperate Housewives (season 2)

Hi there, I noticed you did some cleanup on the season 2 article. How would you to rewrite the entire article, and even make it FL worthy? Contact me when you feel like it. Cheers! (SUDUSER)₈₅ 04:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just checked out whatcha did on the second season's page, looks great! However, I don't think the UK ratings table is really necessary, I don't know, what do you think? Reply on my talk, cheers! (SUDUSER)₈₅ 03:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

High School Musical

Hi, I noticed the comment you made on Talk:High School Musical (film series) on a suggested revamp in August and then September. I think this is definitely a good idea, and I'd be willing to help. I'm particularly concerned because after clicking through several related articles, there are blatant contradictions between the wikipedia pages on whether or not certain characters are returning for movie 4, etc. Let me know if you're still interested! Jaya Cloudbird (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you could link me to any easily accessible sources you already have from that paper you wrote? I'll of course do some googling, but the fact is that a simple google search turns up ten times as many fan sites as it does anything remotely non-fansite-ish. I'll start by incorporating the important parts of the article on the first film into this one and making it less of a plot summary. --Jaya _{summons|contribs} 22:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another thought - since we're proposing a major overhaul to the article, how do you feel about sticking it in a userpage sandbox in either my or your userspace until it's done? Sometimes the existing article can be distracting, but I don't care either way.--Jaya _{summons|contribs} 22:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good - do you want to create the sandbox page or should I? I don't care, but I don't want to create one just yet if we're not going to use it, because I have nothing else to use it for just yet.--Jaya _{summons|contribs} 22:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good :) Thanks!--Jaya _{summons|contribs} 22:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

		The Original Barnstar
		Just a quick "thank you!" from one article writer to another. Patrolling new pages, I came across a load of well-referenced BLPs and thought the writer deserved some kind of reward :). Ironholds (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted scenes are not cannon

Concerning this edit of yours I would like to inform you that deleted scenes aren't cannon i.e. they aren't part of the plot. -- Magioladitis (talk) 02:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PR

You are most welcome. I'm glad you found the review helpful; that makes the effort worthwhile. Finetooth (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remember Paul? on hold

Hello, I have reviewed Remember Paul? for GA, and I have placed it on hold. There are only a few things that needed to be sorted out and after that I will pass the article. Thanks. -- Matthew RD 22:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking a look at the article. I agreed with the concerns you mentioned and made the necessary adjustments. Akcvtt (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot (Desperate Housewives) GAN

I reviewed Pilot (Desperate Housewives) and left comments. You can find it here: Talk:Pilot (Desperate Housewives)/GA2. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 17:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder that there still remains one last fix before the article will pass. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 04:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disney Role Call

Hi, WikiProject Disney has been rather inactive recently. I saw that you are a member of the project. If you still consider yourself to be an active member, leave a response on the Project's talk page. Hopefully we can get the project up and running again. Thanks!--GroovySandwich 00:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MJ Delfino

Hi. The revision I made was a revert of an unregistered user who altered your text to say that MJ's middle name was Maynard. I reverted it back to your version. Please reread the paragraph and the revision history and you will see what I am talking about. When you undo mu revision, you are reverting the text back to the version by the unregistered user, which is in error. Thanks. BurienBomber (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to the Rain on the Roof GA

Listen to the Rain on the Roof has passed! Good work! Ruby2010 comment! 21:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

invitation

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining the Friends task force. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Friends related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page! Thank You.

--nijil (talk) 10:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PR question

Thanks for your work on the Desperate Housewives articles. I replied at Wikipedia:Peer review/Secrets That I Never Want to Know/archive1 Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 11:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Gabrielle Solis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kevin Murphy and Katie Ford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BobHunterDH.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BobHunterDH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:RichardBurgi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RichardBurgi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. January (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of One Wonderful Day

The article One Wonderful Day you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:One Wonderful Day for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? Statυs (talk) 07:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Work on Acquaintances of Susan Mayer

I think that the work you did on the former article Acquaintances of Susan Mayer was amazing. The info you added on Julie Mayer allowed us to retrieve her own article, since you provided with both "Development/casting" and "Reception" material. The article has been merged, but we kept the real-world content you added. Do you think you can take a look at List of Desperate Housewives characters and do something similar for the rest of characters? --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Bianco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Bianco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bianco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Desperate housewives nice is better than good.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Desperate housewives nice is better than good.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:One Wonderful Day scene.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:One Wonderful Day scene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Desperate housewives remember paul.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Desperate housewives remember paul.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Hello. Please take a look at this discussion. Thanks. Bionic (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hello. Please see this discussion. Bionic (talk) 07:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BobAndLee.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BobAndLee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riverdale (American TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Hughes and Ryan Murphy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanner Stransky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanner Stransky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Stransky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Ganzel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Ganzel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Ganzel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]