User talk:Divineplus

This is Divineplus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
64	ATA Martial Arts (talk)	Add sources
34	Muyedobotongji (talk)	Add sources
29	Hwang Kee (talk)	Add sources
157	Secretary General of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (talk)	Add sources
11	Indo-Caribbean music (talk)	Add sources
222	Mohan Meakin (talk)	Add sources
61	Breaking (martial arts) (talk)	Cleanup
116	Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad (talk)	Cleanup
23	Capstone Publishers (talk)	Cleanup
4	Hapki Kochido Musool (talk)	Expand
11	Thirayattam (talk)	Expand
189	Timeline of Amazon Web Services (talk)	Expand
241	Sexuality in India (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
28	Ssaurabi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
231	Mushin (mental state) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
322	Lungi (talk)	Merge
944	Compost (talk)	Merge
969	Sewage treatment (talk)	Merge
342	Income in India (talk)	Wikify
512	Indian labour law (talk)	Wikify
267	Labour in India (talk)	Wikify
14	Krishna Engineering College (talk)	Orphan
10	Sunder Deep Group of Institutions (talk)	Orphan
3	AYMTM (talk)	Orphan
249	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
291	20th SAARC summit (talk)	Stub
11	SAARC Fountain (talk)	Stub
27	Credible minimum deterrence (talk)	Stub
28	Dasna (talk)	Stub
12	17th SAARC summit (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Divineplus! Your additions to Ghaziabad Development Authority have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Atul Raghav

Hi,TheChunky (talk · contribs),Liz (talk · contribs). I hope you both are doing well. I have a concern, my draft article is not being reviewed yet. It had been many weeks and I'm waiting for it to be accepted so that I can contribute further in combat sports in India keeping in mind my mistakes. I create articles of notable athletes by following the wikipedia policy with complete honesty. Can you view this draft and move this into mainspace? I request you to do this.Divineplus (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atul Raghav has been accepted

Atul Raghav, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your question about "Paid editing"

Hello, @Divineplus! Sorry to bother you, I never take any money from anybody, believe me!!! I really love Wikipedia (Because it's is a good knowledge source), so I've always wants to edit Wikipedia articles to make them more accurate...Thanks ---Limited Idea4me (talk) 17:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for validating my friend Limited Idea4me but I never said that you have taken any payment. I supported you that even if you have not taken payment, just improve the article so that it can be more in a neutral point of view.Divineplus (talk) 18:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalyanaraman S (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies a bit too much on primary sources, including the subjects own publications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalyanaraman S and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kalyanaraman S, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 22:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Divineplus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eternal Shadow Talk 22:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atul Raghav for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atul Raghav, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Raghav (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]