User talk:Joseph20202021/Archive 1

Welcome

Hello Joseph20202021/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Bmdavll ^talk 13:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Calderon

Please, you live in Australia so I think you are not well informed. I am not with any party or with any religion. The polical campaing via the TV is full of lies. You know what did the Nazis don´t you? I will tell you. If you tell a lie to many times it will become the truth. This is what the Nazis did and Calderon and the PAN is doing this via TV, I´d like you could see at least one spot of him. Regards User:Juanlopez

Thank you very much for correcting my user page User:Juanlopez.

Hello Joseph. If possible, I'd like your support in including one sentence in the AMLO entry regarding the number of Mexicans who believe that fraud took place in the election. I sourced the poll twice, and it was deleted. Moreover, the person who deleted it believed it was not pertinent. I clearly disagree, as is the high number of Mexicans who believe fraud took place before and during the election that has given rise to the 42% figure. I'd appreciate your assistance. 69.211.18.106 01:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Socialists

made this userbox thought you might like. template:User Socialist. Bartimaeus 11:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church of Wikipedia

Since you are listed as a Roman Catholic, I urge you to vote to delete this offensive article: User:Sam Korn/Catholic Church of Wikipedia, which is a parody of Catholicism, at this page: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sam Korn/Catholic Church of Wikipedia, and tell other people to do the same. --Shanedidona 01:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help

I would appreciate help with watching LIFE (Charity) and Central Catholic Library both of which I feel have merit and are only being classified unencyclopedic because the "editor" has a grudge against me. Chooserr

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. --cj | talk 07:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Best country in world

Dear Joseph, it's great to see at your User page that you have found a new home and success here in Australia, which is indeed the best country in the world. You are very welcome. I hope you enjoy editing here at Wikipedia. Adam 08:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was born here. Please sign your edits. Adam 10:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd add my congrats for you being in the best country in the world ;). As a guy with a few Filipino-Australian mates, glad you're here. michael ^talk 04:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of 'liberals wikipedians' category

Hi. I saw your listed in this category which is up for deletion. Hoped you'd like to vote in favor of keeping it... Thanks! Larix 22:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes on AU Prime Ministers' articles

Hi there Australia boy. I note that you've taken to adding a "Religion" section to the infoboxes on several of the Australian PMs' articles. While their particular religion may in some instances have some bearing on their public life, simply labelling them as 'Roman Catholic', 'Anglican', or whatever in this way is probably not too informative. Indeed, in many instances a PM's religious beliefs (insofar as they are publicly known) will be difficult to summarise by a one- or two-word expression. By all means, if an individual's religous affiliation has been of significance to their achievements, then it can be appropriately mentioned and discussed in the main body of the article itself. After some discussion at the Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board, consensus seems to favour its removal, and I've started to revert these changes. If you have another opinion on the matter, you are invited to discuss it further over here. Kind regards, --cjllw | TALK 04:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CAoW

Since you are listed as a Roman Catholic, I figured I'd send you this. Wikipedia:Catholic Alliance of wikipedia has been nominated for Deletion. Please vote and/or tell other people to vote to keep this organization on wikipedia. --Shanedidona 01:28, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of administrators

Greetings! I've removed your name from the list of administrators. If you'd like to become a Wikipedia admin, you must first request it at the requests page, usually after you've been around for a few months. However, you don't have to be an admin to do things like reverting vandalism, cleaning up articles, and helping write policy: see the community portal for some ideas for tasks that need doing. Thanks, Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've removed it again. Please do not add it again without producing evidence that you are an administrator. If you really are one, could you protect my user page to prove it? Then I'll put your name back in. But at the moment, nobody seems to believe that you are one, and there's no record in the logs of any administrator acts carried out by you. Cheers. AnnH ^(talk) 10:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless Edits

Hi, could you please explain why you changed the order of the two religions in the Canberra article? If you are attempting to present your "Point of View" by manipulating mentions of religions, please be aware that this is highly against wikipedia policy. --Martyman-(talk) 08:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Even though your argument is true, it is still a pointless edit. The only reason I can see behind it being some petty desire of yours to see your religion listed first. There could be equally convincing arguments made for listing them the other way around. Please try to avoid making edits that can be construed as you pushing your religion while failing to be at all benificial to the article in question. --Martyman-(talk) 09:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ang Dating Daan

Hi. I added the two critical links again. The article Ang Dating Daan is not an advertising for the religion, but should be merely information about the religion, which includes also comments critically about the religion. Hence, these critical links are also needed for the article. For your info: I am not for or against this religion, and do not care about it except for the Wikipedia article having a WP:NPOV. Thanks for your understanding -- Chris 73 | Talk 10:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a source...

... for this picture? Keep in mind that copyright law in Mexico doesn't work like in the U.S. and you may be infringing the rights of a Mexican author. Thanks. Rune.welsh 08:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I feared. This is not even a government photo. Please change the image license tag to {{fairuse}}. Thanks. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 09:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the license tag myself. This image cannot be GFDL because you're not the author and the author has not licensed it as such. There is no evidence this image is in the public domain either. I also make a point in noting that you made edits after my previous message and you still did not change the tag as requested. Happy editing. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 20:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs of Mexican politicians

I had a look at your contributions list and I noticed that you uploaded a number of photographs of Mexican politicians. These suffer of the same problem as the Lázaro Cárdenas picture above, i.e. they lack a source but you still claim them to be released under the GFDL. The offending images are:

Please state a source for each image in their description page and tag them with {{fairusein|NAME OF ARTICLE}} as approppriate. If you refuse to comply after a reasonable period of time I'll make a note of this at the Administrator's notice board. If you have any questions about image copyrights in Mexico please don't hesitate to ask me in my talk page. Regards. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 20:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were given a week to state a source for each image and change their license tags. Since you didn't do it, I went ahead and labelled them as "Possibly Unfree Images" and will get deleted soon. Please consider providing proper sourcing information for these images before to prevent their removal. DO NOT remove the tag yourself. Regards. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 20:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyrights

Hi. You need to read Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Image use policy. None of the images you are uploading can be used by us. If you continue you will be blocked from editing. Thanks. Secretlondon 20:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You used {{GFDL-self}} on Image:Carpenter.jpg. It is obvious that you did not take that picture, which is what the GFDL_self tag claims. i have replaced this with {{promophoto}} as it appears that this photograph has been used in press releases and other promotional contexts. Please be more careful about image copyright tags in future. DES ^(talk) 21:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Index_motif.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Index_motif.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 20:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Australia boy

Out of curiousity, are you planning on completing this self-nomination? CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 07:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Meetup

Hi there!

Just to let you know, there will be a meetup of Sydney Wikipedians on 5 February 2006. If you can make it, that'll be great because there'll be quite a few interesting developments to discuss, as well as just getting to know each other.

Please add yourself to the list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney if you are able to come, as we as provide suggestions as to the time and location of the event.

Thanks, and I hope to see you there.

Cheers, enochlau (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timezone

The change to move the list to a separate article was agreed by consensus in the talk page. You have twice now put the list back without any discussion in talk. If you have a good reason for moving the list from a separate article into one huge article, then discuss it in talk first please. Stephen.frede 11:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Marcos i.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Marcos i.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

feydey 06:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please change copyright licences yourself, I did not upload the image so I cannot put another licence. feydey 06:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the image violation notice carefully, for example it says: 1. Please do not edit this media for the moment. feydey 06:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please add fair use rationale or the image will be deleted according to Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion. feydey 09:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Néstor Kirchner

Hi! I'm a member of WikiProject Argentina. I saw your edits to the article on Néstor Kirchner and wanted to ask you to discuss such large changes in the talk page first. Unfortunately your additions came right after some major vandalism (an anti-Kirchnerist!) and I've had no choice but to revert everything in the article to the last "good" version. We've had these several users applying and re-applying the same extremely biased comments changes to the article for one or two days now. I'll try to restore what you added, but I think it'd be better if we worked on a draft outside the article and then change the whole thing in a single edit. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 10:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English level

I'm sorry to bother you with such a message, specially since I'm definitely not the most indicated person to do this observation, but considering this message I suggest you to modify in your user page the info-box that states you speak "English at a near-native level". Please don't get me wrong, there's no offence intended. Take care, and good wiking. Mariano(t/c) 08:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image size

Hello. This is regarding your recent edit to the article Chile: Do not delete images from articles merely because you feel that their size is wrong. That is considered disruptive and is not helpful to the this project. Instead, consider making constructive edits, such as resizing an image that you think has an inappropriate size. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 16:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, if you think that the size is wrong, be bold and change the size. Do not delete images to state a point about the proportions of a country. The map is not "so too long", the map is a representation of the country itself. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 09:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hello, Joseph20202021/Archive 1, and thank you for vote on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 62/2/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. As I acclimate myself to my new tools, feel free to let me know how you believe I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Radio Kirk talk to me 05:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re Eliseo Soriano

You removed the {{fact}} tag from the Eliseo Soriano article, but did not leave a cite to show that the information is accurate. I have replaced the tag. If corroborating information is not posted within a few days then I will remove both the tag AND the information because it seems very far fetched indeed. Moriori 01:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for voting in my RfA!

Thanks for voting in my RfA! The nomination didn't gain consensus, but I'm glad I accepted the nomination. - Amgine 21:15, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Hi Joseph20202021/Archive 1,

Thank you for supporting my RFA! Unfortunately it did not succeed mainly because most opposers wanted me to spend more time on Wikipedia. Thank you for your faith in me & looking forward to your continued support in the future.

Cheers

Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 08:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of all ethnic categories

Have you noticed what is being proposed to be done to all the categories named 'xxx people by ethnic or national origin' (such as Category:American people by ethnic or national origin and all ethnic/national origin subcategories?

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 20

There does not seem to be anyone interested in this, but me. Are you? Do you know others? Thanks Hmains 04:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Cebu

Can you remove it from your userpage? That category is for articles only, not for Users. Thanks. --Howard t he Du c k 08:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Keneally.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Keneally.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peta 09:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lopezbio.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lopezbio.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beatriz Paredes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beatriz Paredes.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fotolab.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fotolab.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1/4 Spanish

Interesting you say you are 1/4 Spanish. I thought that the Spaniards that went to Argao had done so in the 1840s or so. At least that's what I saw in the church records, what few Spaniards there were in town like that Mallorcan Capt. whose name I forgot that married a Mestiza. But then again, the most recent church records I went through were dated in the 1880s, so I guess it would make sense why I never noticed any Spaniard in Argao in the early to mid 20th century. Mamoahina 06:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read about a mass migration out of Cebu, I thought it was in the 40s or so? I know it was to Mindanao, and I guess it was to Davao del Sur as you mentioned. So your Spanish ancestor went to Davao instead of Argao then? Mamoahina 05:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More on Argao

I read about a mass migration out of Cebu, I thought it was in the 40s or so? I know it was to Mindanao, and I guess it was to Davao del Sur as you mentioned. So your Spanish ancestor went to Davao instead of Argao then? You mentioned the Carillo family of Argao, but the only information I have on what seems to be the oldest information I found on any of the Carillos comes from the Argao San Miguel Church records. Bartolome Carillo married Semperesa Fuentes, had a son Sotero who married Celestina Sabado on Jan. 20, 1853.

I didn't concentrate on the Carillos in my research, unless there was a different Carillo family that arrived recently, as in the 20th century. Because the Carillos I listed, the church records identified them as all "indios". There were a few Mestizos mentioned in the church records and in fact, there was a Lucero female mestiza that married that Mallorcan captain I mentioned (whose name I forgot at the moment) and their descendants were listed as Mestizos. In any case, I did do a search in the Catálogo Alfabético de Apellidos on Carillo and did not find that spelling but did find "CARRILLO" which is how many Latinos in the U.S. spell that surname. However, there were others in Argao that spelled it "Carrillo" and I've seen the spelling changes with surnames like Umeres/Umerez and Quintanar/Kintanar, which leads me to believe that Carillo/Carrillo are the same. Plus, the fact that many towns would have the town's people take on surnames with letters usually beginning with the same letter and that Argao had surnames like Camello, Caminade, Campaner, Campomanes/z, Campilla, Camposo, Canada, Canedo, Capadñgan, Carredo, Catalan, Camasura and Calledo (and many more), all if you notice beginning with CA, coupled with the fact that Argao's share of "Spaniards" or other foreigners like a few Chinese were actually mentioned in records, validates that the Carrillo/Carillo family did have their surname selected from the Catálogo Alfabético de Apellidos. Remember, only those who had carried their surnames for at least 3 generations previously (which means the Chinese and the Spaniards) were able to continue their surname among their families.

Now you mentioned 1/4 Spanish, which means one of your grandparents (probably a grandfather?) was from Spain, right? Or were 2 of your grandparents half Spanish each thereby still giving the blood quantum of 1/4 Spanish? Mamoahina 05:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The well known Spaniards or half Spanish people I know from Argao and of whom I found in church records was a woman named Maria Taguenca Cabrera who married D. Celestino Cayetano Gumila. Celestino's father was the Mallorcan captain I mentioned, Cayetano was the surname. Maria however was the daughter of Mauricia Lucero and D. Geronimo Taguenca. Geronimo was half Spanish but took on the name Taguenca Cabrera in 1849 (Surname decree) which gave way to just Cabrera. Have you heard of Todd Lucero-Sales? He resides in Cebu City but is working more on the Lucero family and gave me details of Maria Cabrera's heritage although I found the marriage record of her mentioning the Mallorcan captain. So again, who exactly was the Spaniard in your family? I'll have to assume it was either your maternal grandfather or any of your grandmothers, but we know for a fact las Españolas were few in the Philippines, especially in the Visayas in the 20th century. By the way, you and I are close in age so I assume our grandparents were born within the same time, so we're talking very late 19th century to early 20th century. Mamoahina 17:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding removing a couple Felipe Calderón photos

Zscout370 has raised the issue at Talk:Felipe Calderón of removing the cropped photos due to the curved corners and having 4 fair use photos in a relatively small article. They are kind of jammed up at the top too, though they are appropriate for their sections. Now that he's president-elect, the article's likely to get bigger, though not necessarily his previous political career and early years sections.

I'm ambivalent so far. I can see what Zscout is saying, but I wouldn't mind if they stayed in. TransUtopian 03:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVG

Please do not replace SVG images with old PNG versions. SVGs have better resolution and readers do not notice the format difference because Wikipedia servers convert it to png while loading the page anyway. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 14:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calderon pictures

Re this edit. Do not replace free images with fair use ones. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 12:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue reverting to fair use images you will be blocked for violating the Fair use policy. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 11:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope you didn't make this edit. The IP originates in Australia, and given your previous troubled history with image copyrights I have a hard time assuming good faith here. Please do not game the system. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 08:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Convergence

Hi there. I hope you are keeping well. Someone wants to turn Socialist Convergence (Mexico) into a redirect page unless we can make it less stubby. Can you help? I saw you've contributed there before...! --Duncan 17:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines

Can you replace the {{fact}} tags you removed with citations? If not I'll reinstate them. --Howard the Duck 14:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Andrew Gonzalez

The Philippine Lasallian Style Guide states that the word Brother could only be shortened to "Br." and not "Bro." -- Mithril Cloud 11:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Convergencia

Hi Joseph!

Convergence was not supporting Cesar Raul Ojeda's candidacy, means he was not Convergence's candidate. Your recent edits on Tabasco state election, 2006 are incorrect. Ojada is the candidate of the PRD, PT and de PASDC but not Convergence.

Please indicate your sources or change your edits.

Best regards,

Abögarp 18:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mahatma Gandhi

Hi, I noticed your changing the footnotes to a seperate section. Since they are simply inline citations and used as references, I have moved them to a sub-section of the references. - Mike | Talk 15:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A popovich i.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A popovich i.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:S 0202se.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:S 0202se.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Rossrs 03:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Template:1996 Leaders of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation Leaders’ Forum

I reverted back your edit, because the template is still for deletion. You may give your views about this deletion here: [1]. — Indon (reply) — 10:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TIJUANA04.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TIJUANA04.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 17:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The family of Felipe Calderon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The family of Felipe Calderon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 17:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Francisco labastida ochoa 200x220.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Francisco labastida ochoa 200x220.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 03:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]