User talk:Klaatu~enwiki

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. This account was created for you. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme|your question here}} on this page, and someone will be around to help. Again, welcome! --AccReqBot (talk) 15:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

I've moved the page for you. KTC 11:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once your account is four days old, you will be able to move pages for yourself. A 'move' tab will appear on the top of each page, just like the 'edit this page' tab. See Help:Moving a page for more info. Raven4x4x 11:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. And sorry for mess up.

Near Earth Asteroids

This edit shouldn't have been made - the number is correct and in the listed source. Our sourcing policy doesn't require online sources (although that article is online) and demanding them is inappropriate. If you want the source quoted, ask for it on the talk page in the future. Cheers, Wily D 16:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'll also mention it's usually considered bad form to go complaining about someone before talking to them directly, see our dispute resolution procedures for more details. Cheers, Wily D 20:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neo, I think the article is now clear on what these events are and why we don't see cities leveled by impacts every few years. Does it address your concerns? Thanks. --Reuben (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir. Thanks very much to both of you. NEO (talk) 10:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keanu Reeves

Just so you know: the Canadian show in which Keanu Reeves had his first television appearance was actually called Hangin' In, and already had an article, and the show that you wrote up at the title Hanging In also already had an article at the title Mr. Dugan. Bearcat (talk) 05:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian films

HI Keanu hope you and Bill and Ted are good. I noticed you have been adding some films from the huge list of missing films I compiled. Thanks. Can you remember though to add the film to the year in Bollywood film e.g Bollywood films of 1995 etc. Thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 10:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir, I will remember that. Thanks. NEO (talk) 13:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

That was a dumb edit you corrected. I can't believe I put March on the Near-Earth object page then failed to recognize it.Trilobitealive (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prem Qaidi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prem Qaidi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Qaidi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Klaatu. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Klaatu~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

15:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aadhi Raat Ke Baad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aadhi Raat Ke Baad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aadhi Raat Ke Baad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ek Abla

The article Ek Abla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Other than trivia sites, wiki mirrors and IMDb, there's no coverage online of this. Offline directory source searches such as WorldCat and JSTOR turn up nothing of note per WP:NFILM either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ek Abla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ek Abla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ek Abla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 14:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aag Aur Toofan

The article Aag Aur Toofan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. All the sources I can find are routine mentions and I have seen nothing that would go towards establishing notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 (talk) 18:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bal Bramhachari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bal Bramhachari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bal Bramhachari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragoMynaa (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aag Ka Toofan

The article Aag Ka Toofan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM, only videos, soundtracks, film database sites and promo materials.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maang Bharo Sajana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maang Bharo Sajana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maang Bharo Sajana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Filmomusico (talk) 22:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anjaane (2000 film)

The article Anjaane (2000 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't find any reliable sources/reviews. Only source is this passing table listing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anjaane (2000 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjaane (2000 film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjaane (2000 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Megha (1996 film)

The article Megha (1996 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PravinGanechari (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]