User talk:SGL333

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! SGL333, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Samara levine and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. We encourage you to read our instructions for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to participate in either the School and University WikiProject or the Global Education Program. The Global Education Program is supported by the Wikimedia Foundation and offers official online and classroom support through the Ambassador Program.

Here are some other pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Birds WikiProject! As you've probably guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of bird-related topics.

A few features that you may find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, outreach, and other tasks.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
Read our current newsletter, and sign up for (or opt out) of future issues.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any experienced member of the project; we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! MeegsC (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lark Bunting

Hi, thanks for your edits to this article. Unfortunately there are a few problems

You have a list of references, but because you have not used in line references, it is impossible to attribute each part of the text to a specific reference

You have not wikilinked to other articles, or followed the bird project conventions and MoS for section headings and their capitalisation

~~The text appeared almost in one edit, which makes me wonder where it comes from~~

There is a large unattributed quote under references, needs a reference and should be a note, not loose text or a reference

I'm minded to revert the article to its previous version, but I'm aware you are a student, so I'll give you a bit of time. Please look at an article like Corn Crake to see how an article should be laid out and referenced. Let me know if you need help, or post on the project talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply. You may find the WikiEd add-on (My Preferences - Gadgets) useful if you are not already using it. Wikipedia:INCITE#Inline_citations and Wikipedia:Citation_templates are your complete guide to referencing, let me know if you get stuck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, I really appreciate your patience. I think I have corrected the citations and they are now in the correct format, I am, however, still having trouble referencing my citations within the piece. Since a reflist has already been made by the original editor, I'm not sure how to add my references to that list in order to properly use them for in text citations. I appreciate the referral to those two sites; I think they will be very helpful once I get my foot in the door a bit more. Samara levine (talk) 02:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the in test citing, write <ref> ___the source____ </ref> and if will add the citation to the references and the appropriate number to the statement being referenced.

   -cobiorower

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.173.114 (talk) 17:49, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lark Bunting

Much better. I made these changes, and removed the tag. Could probably do with a few more wikilinks, and the first para of your section appears to be unrefeerenced. I'm away for a couple of days, I'll have another look when I return. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:28, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi SGL333! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patricia G. Parker.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SGL333. You have new messages at CharmlessCoin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Patricia G. Parker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The previous reviewer did not havethe experience to apply WP:PROF correctly. I work very frequently with articles like this, and I am confident in telling you that the purpose of WP:PROF is to be an alternative to the GNG, not an additional requirement, and this has been accepted at essentially all AfDs. A person with a named professorship at a major university fully meets the requirements of WP:PROF, and so do people with distinctions like Fellowship of the AAAS, which is much more than mere membership. Either of these are always been considered sufficient distinction for Wikipedia .

It is however be good to add a list of the most cited published papers with their citation figures--its appropriate content.

DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Red-collared Widowbird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dominance

Weeper capuchin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vocalization

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red-collared Widowbird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regurgitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination

Hi Samara: I've started a review of your Red-collared Widowbird article, and have been stymied by this edit. In the future, please don't change the status of a GA review on the article's talk page. There is a bot that does this, based on certain things happening at the GAN page. These are now out of synch, and will have to be fixed by an administrator! :P By the way, it's also good form to fix the things mentioned in the first review before submitting it again; those "citation needed" tags are still there! MeegsC (talk) 15:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies! I'm new to the nominations; I appreciate the help! I didn't realize there were still "citation needed" tags. I addressed these now and I believe addressed the other concerns of the first review. If not, I appreciate all the constructive criticism! Thanks again! Samara levine (talk) 15:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I've left a note at the GAN page, asking for help. By the way, you might consider asking for a peer review at WP:BIRD before submitting your article—at least until you get the hang of what's needed. This article is quite a ways from GA status, but I'm certainly willing to work with you to get it there. If you want see examples of bird articles currently at GA status (to see what sort of standard they're held to), see the listing on the WP:BIRD page. And don't forget that there are lots of us at the project ready and willing to help you out; just ask! :) MeegsC (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You have worked exceedingly well to being the Crested Auklet up to a very good standard. So I think you deserve this! Rainbow Shifter (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!Samara levine (talk)

Thanks for posting at WP:ENB

I have a tip. I see your name is not "clickable" with your comment there, so I think you might have signed it not in the way that is described at H:Cheatsheet. That way should make things easier. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not sure what the problem is because I added the signature as I always do? Let me know!SGL333 02:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Additionally, can I assume that people will have seen my comment or should I contact them directly? SGL333 22:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I emailed you an option. Also, you could ask User:Sage Ross (WMF), though I do doubt it will work (for you to get the instructor right). Sorry I might have given you an untenable suggestion! Best. Biosthmors (talk) 03:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tito Dutta (contact) 10:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samer Hattar, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]