User talk:Suonii180/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Suonii180. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Lee Pace
Thanks for fixing Lee Pace. I was trying to figure that out, but the citations seemed to be contradictory. I didn't see one (maybe skipped over) that was obviously by Pace. Is there an obvious source for that? It might be good to add it to the "as queer" which hopefully would stop this rather slow edit war. Thanks Adakiko (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: I found it in ref 1, the NYT article. It's annoyingly paywalled but I managed to find the part in the article before the paywall message came up where it referenced a tweet he made describing himself as being part of the queer community, I double checked the tweet and it's still up on his twitter account. I also found this article from pinknews from August this year that references the same tweet. There are some conflicting articles though and the first ref and tweet are from 2018 so maybe there should be a talk page discussion to get WP:Consensus in case he uses a different term now. Suonii180 (talk) 22:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Has category:American gay actors. No category:American queer actors that I can see. Change to category:Queer actors? I believe that twitter can be used for self-identity wp:TWITTER. Should it be cited? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: There's category:LGBT actors from the United States which could work as category:American queer actresses is a subcategory within it but there isn't an actors subcat. If not then category:Queer actors would probably work as well. It would probably be a good idea to add it as a source especially as some of the other sources available are paywalled. Regards, Suonii180 (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- The first would work, I'd think. If there are a significant number that fit, could create category:American queer actors. Here is the latest archive.today link all the archives Cheers Adakiko (talk) 00:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Its regarding Sarita Joshi's personal bio where you are adding unverified and incorrect information
Not sure why you are removing parameters like this. These are cosmetic edits that make no difference in the rendered output and should only be done in conjunction with more substantial changes. Also, you are actually making conflicts errors because this infobox can't have other_name and alias at the same time. You apparently aren't doing a Show Preview its a personal bio page and you can't edit things without verifying its personal offence do check before adding any person's relationships in a website and you can't link someone name and relation as spouses etc without checking it is true or not 223.223.151.44 (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Her first marriage to Rajkumar Khatau is mentioned and sourced in the main text and your edit added unsourced information including date of birth which shouldn't be included without secondary sources as per WP:DATEOFBIRTH. You need to provide sources when adding information including personal information and public opinions of TV shows. Suonii180 (talk) 18:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Re: Sydney Swans edit not ‘constructive’
If you want to draw my attention, then expect a reply. Thanks for the message re: reverting my edit for not being ‘constructive’.
Now I don’t know if you’ve ever been to Australia before (let alone Melbourne), but over there, we make these strange things called jokes. It is quite normal for fans of opposing clubs to rip the hell out of each other, especially within AFL when you get big rivalries such as my club Collingwood against Carlton, but we’re able to do it in ways that doesn’t lead to public violence, which is why the Grand Final has been such an open environment.
That being said, I’ve made the joke at the expense of the Swans (even though I’m not a Geelong supporter), it’s done and the AFL season is over, you’ve done the reversal already and Wikipedia’s servers haven’t burnt to the ground, so build a bridge and get over it.
And I seriously hope you’re not taking a ‘do good at all costs’ meaning to that ‘constructive’ reasoning. Your job there is to maintain a factual and unbiased article, not writing a cheer squad chant.
As for sport in general, whether you want to hear it or not, if losses and jokes at one’s expense is a given in life, then it is doubly so in sport. Take this from a supporter of the most infamous club in the AFL who has had to go through a gutful of rips after we lost the 2018 Grand Final to West Coast at the hands of one Dom Sheed. Resilience is required in this situation, because it’s no good being permanently depressed over some words or some moments in time, because guess what? It’s a sport. As long as someone supports his or her team, who cares what others think? My club is the most hated in the entire league, but it doesn’t bother me.
While professional sport is a much beloved aspect of life, it can also at times be the cruelest thing ever, and it was exactly that for the Sydney Swans who hardly did anything in this year’s Grand Final, seeing as Geelong had one of their easiest victories out there. So if you can’t put up with the reality of losing a big game, and if you can’t grasp the concept of supporters having a go at each other and engaging in jokes and bantering at one another’s expense, then stay the hell away from professional sport.
The 2022 Grand Final is done. Now it’s time to move on. 211.31.198.120 (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 30 September 2022
- News and notes: Board vote results, bot's big GET, crat chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab"
- In the media: A few complaints and mild disagreements
- Special report: Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution
- Discussion report: Much ado about Fox News
- Traffic report: Kings and queens and VIPs
- Featured content: Farm-fresh content
- CommonsComix: CommonsComix 2: Paulus Moreelse
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 Years ago: September 2022
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Morton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bristol Academy.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 31 October 2022
- From the team: A new goose on the roost
- News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment
- Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove
- Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com
- Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?
- Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal
Shadow ministerships
Please see these contribs concerning the mass removal of shadow ministerships from Canadian MP infoboxes. I left a note on their talk page, but it seems that they are just undoing undos. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- @PerpetuityGrat: I've left a message at their talk page as well with links to WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD and again suggested that they discuss the changes first so hopefully they'll do that instead of undoing reverts again. I also misunderstood the COI notice they were leaving in the edit summaries so I've striked that part out of my message, I think my brain was having a bit of a WP:TROUT moment. Suonii180 (talk) 15:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 28 November 2022
- News and notes: English Wikipedia editors: "We don't need no stinking banners"
- In the media: "The most beautiful story on the Internet"
- Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed
- Book review: Writing the Revolution
- Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality
- Essay: The Six Million FP Man
- Tips and tricks: (Wiki)break stuff
- Recent research: Study deems COVID-19 editors smart and cool, questions of clarity and utility for WMF's proposed "Knowledge Integrity Risk Observatory"
- Featured content: A great month for featured articles
- Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
- CommonsComix: Joker's trick
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Happy New Year, Suonii180!
Suonii180,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 22:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 22:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hispanophobia
Suonii180, this is hispanophobia. And censorship. The sovereign country where his grandfather was from is censored due to prejudice, but the origin of his region is maintained. That doesn't make any sense. Hate towards all things Spanish is common in some English-speaking communities, but it should be eradicated from this encyclopedia. Lopezsuarez (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Lopezsuarez: I'm going with the consensus on the talk page, if you disagree then it would be better to discuss it there. Suonii180 (talk) 18:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
art
Hello, I am not able to write an English article. For an artist I have on Google. Can you write the introduction? If you agree I prepared his media links. to send 31.14.146.24 (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I am not able to write an English article. For an artist I have on Google. Can you write the introduction? If you agree I prepared his media links. to send
- bakhtar.international.museum@gmail.com 31.14.146.24 (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've not been creating many biographies lately. If you would like to request that an article is written it would be better to add their name to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession#Artists or discuss it at a related WikiProject such as WP:ART. Regards Suonii180 (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Glenn Jobe page
Thank you very much for your message, Louise!
im not sure how to change Glenn’s birth date without having a copy of his birth certificate. He is a friend, and I verified the date 2 days ago.
im also trying to stop the deletion request of his page. He is a noteworthy member of the Truckee / Tahoe / Sierra biathlon and cross country skiing community. I am looking for articles written about him and will include those on his page. Thank you again.
TDSnowshoe (talk) 03:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
@TDSnowshoe:, Hi! I've been pinged at the deletion discussion, glad sources were found. A birth certificate wouldn't be a suitable source as it falls under WP:PRIMARY. For help on finding suitable sources please see WP:RELIABLE. If you have a close connection with the subject of a Wikipedia article then it's advised that you don't edit the article directly as it could be a conflict of interest. Instead it would be better to discuss changes at the talk page first, I've left a notice at your talk page with links regarding these policies. Let me know if you have any questions or alternatively you can ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Regards, Suonii180 (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Constant Gardener publication date . . .
Hi Suonii180, Thanks for your message. I am currently reading a hardback copy of the book first published in 1995. ISBN 978-0-241-33725-7 Published in GB by Hodder and Stoughton. I have sent photographic evidence in reply to the email I received via Wikipedia. Best wishes, Hugh Hughsnape (talk) 14:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stella Muir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarborough.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Constant Gardener, further publication date evidence . . .
Please view this link re. 1995 publication date:
https://cdn.penguin.co.uk/dam-assets/books/9780241337257/9780241337257-sample.pdf
Hugh Snape Hughsnape (talk) 07:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
Women in Red March 2023
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Aran knitting designs
request samples of Aran knitting 2.138.66.53 (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alice Robertson Carr de Creeft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar Falls.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Candy Gourlay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Medal.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
Women in Red May 2023
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Jason Kelce
He is simply the goat. Why did you delete my edit? HowardRoseman (talk) 23:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HowardRoseman: as per the message I already left on your talk page, new information has to be sourced, especially if it's a biography of a living person. Suonii180 (talk) 23:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Women in Red - June 2023
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Coo Coo Marlin
Changed it because to be like other Wikipedias like Richard Petty or Dale Earnhardt Jr or my other favorite nascar drivers so I apologize not leaving a answer I just wanted to be edited because it felt right. 47.26.59.64 (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
A tag has been placed on Category:Field hockey players by city or town in the United Kingdom indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
Women in Red July 2023
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding lack of civility in WP:CFD. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Invitation
Hello Suonii180!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi Suonii180. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Steps such as checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline are mandatory and will take a few minutes per article.
- Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any required steps.
- Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)