Jump to content

User talk:Xn4/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 5

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Xn4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!    THE GREAT GAVINI {T-C} 07:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--BrownHairedGirl 08:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Re:NPOV

Ah, I didn't mean any of your edits are POV! That's just one of the welcome notices available, and thinking that they're all similar, I put that one on your talk page. I see now it does have some extra stuff about NPOV, but I think it's more for warning you rather than for informative purposes. I'll change it to a more suitable one. All the best, -- THE GREAT GAVINI {T|C|#} 07:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fishmongers-arms.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Fishmongers-arms.gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Nigel Dick

Huh, that's funny. I didn't check the history - I didn't realize your article was so new since it was looking quite complete! I spotted his addition to the Band Aid article, and saw that it was mis-capitalized, so I went to fix that, saw it needed cleanup and did that, then went to move it to the proper title and discovered an already existing article. I can't believe you completed a nice full article in that time! You do good work -- definitely keep it up. Cheers! — Catherine\talk 04:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah, grasshopper, the answer to citations is easy -- just see Wikipedia:Footnotes! It boils down to:
  1. Put your cursor after the period at the end of the sentence you want to footnote. Click "<ref></ref>" in the insert box (down underneath the edit box and the save/preview buttons).
  2. Put your cursor between the "><". Type your citation, in any format that gets the point across. (If someone else thinks they can improve it, they will.)
  3. Put your cursor under an existing or newly created "References" header, and click "<references/>" in the insert box.
That's it! Preview of course -- missing a closing tag can cause a citation to "eat" the rest of the article below the cite -- but it's easy. There's a few more subtleties if you want to name a source so you can re-use it elsewhere in the article, but you can always master that later. Good luck! — Catherine\talk 05:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Greshams-arms.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Greshams-arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

NB - This image has been superseded by Image:Greshams-arms.gif Xn4 16:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

alumni

I'm impressed too.... I went to see if one could find alumni using online sourse and I chose Derby School as an example. Couldn't find any ... and then you find one every 20 mins or so ... how are you doing it ... are you making them up? :-) Victuallers 16:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

My reply is on your talk page Xn4 16:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
If you get bored with creating articles then have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Assessment‎, you can occupy your time looking at other schools pages and rating them ... only a suggestion. The Derby SchoolS are looking good. You may see that I added some category stuff Victuallers 20:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Derbyshire Schools and ...

Pleased to see the

) box. Looks good. I've added a few more schools to the Derbyshire cat for you to consider. Oh and I assessed all the schools you have included to date.Victuallers 00:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the extra schools .... I'll have a look and see if I can find a few more at the weekend. It would be good to create a similar box for Nottinghamshire schools. Could you give me some pointers as to how to make this happen? Thanks Victuallers 23:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Hammond

Xn4 I would like to contact you about Dr. Jhon Hammond, my grandfather worked with him in 1935 and 1936 in artificial insemination, and I´m joining information for the page I´m wrinting http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albores_de_la_Inseminaci%C3%B3n_Artificial_en_Uruguay Contact me at the e-mail; pjthomasset()montevideo.com.uy

I have improved the John Hammond FRS article for you, adding some references. Xn4 00:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Derby School

Has improved a lot. One suggestion is .... inline refs. Not sure if you know that you can do this in a better way. Your list of refs wsould look muck more impressive. I could explain, but I worked on Tredegar. If you look at the ref list then it is very similar to yours. However if you look at the source then you will see that it was all assembled automatically. Hope this helps Victuallers 23:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  • At present Derby School is rated as one of the best pages for a school on Wikipedia. ... it should have in line refs. If you want then I could convert a few of the refs so you can see how it is done Victuallers 15:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I have done about half the work for the referencing ... do you want to finish it off? I'm willing to but want you to see how. Oh and are you keen take Derby School to GA status? You are now in sight ... Victuallers 21:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Isaac James

Hi. Please use the "Move" tab to move a page to a new title. If you Copy & paste as you did in Isaac James, all the page history remains at the old location. exolon 01:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Pictures of St. Helen's House

I've added a couple of pictures to the article on Derby School. I've a few more that I may use e.g. the war Memorial, the chapel, B-Block, the surrounding area and that fire escape. Any thoughts?OldDerbeian 07:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I've now added more pictures from my visit in May and added a little more vernacular knowledge.OldDerbeian 07:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. I like the rearrangement. I wondered about trying to use a callout style (not quite sure how you do it, but I've seen it on other articles, for some of the material. For instance, I'm trying to track down my copies of the school magazine "The Derbeian" which will provide useful material and is perhaps an interesting topic in itself.OldDerbeian

You're an ace photographer, Terry! Xn4 22:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Old Blues

I have proposed that this category, which you created, be renamed to Category:Christ's Hospital alumni as this would be clearer and in line with other categories for School alumni. --Bduke 23:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

We agreed Category:Christ's Hospital Old Blues instead Xn4 12:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I have added him to notable individuals from Downside School based on the old Gregorians categorisation. I do not know of this assumption is correct.

It is. See Who's Who 2007. Xn4
Many thanks Part 13:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


List of Old Alleynians

First, I think that moving the Old Alleynian list of alumni to its own page is a good move. I like the way this works on other school sites because these lists can become cumbersome. Whenever I create a list from scratch I will now put it into its own page immediately, no matter how small the list. I had intended to do this with Old Alleynians just as soon as I had matched up the names on the Category for Old Alleynians and the List. No good reason why I hadn’t done so before finishing that exercise. As mentioned, I have also been matching up names in the Category:OldAlleynians to the List of Alumni. The list now contains all Old Alleynians in the category bar two.( These two I am dubious as to whether they should be in Wikipedia at all. One of them (Mark Clarke (politician)) certainly just appears to be a mini-CV for a prospective Conservative candidate rather than a mini-biography of an eminent ex-pupil – what are your thoughts? Going the other way, there are five or six on the list that do not appear in the Category by virtue of the fact that they currently have no entry. I was pleased to note that you recently created an article for James Jarvis (illustrator) which reduced this discrepancy. I followed suit with a small article for Rodney Clarke. You have probably noticed that I have been adding VC and GC holders to the various schools amongst the eminent alumni (such as for Old Alleynians and Old Marlburians etc among many others). When doing this, I noted that the Old Alleynian list was not organised in a friendly fashion (to me at least). So I rearranged and also noted that some eminent Old Alleynians that I am aware of did not appear (such as Wing Commander Brock, Wing Commander Stainforth, Sir William Holdsworth etc). Following this was I suppose the Wikipedia classic pattern of noticing that there were no entries for these, or stubs and deciding to create/expand. I must say that I do like your style of list at Old Greshamians. I am not a fan of the Old Carthusians list or Old Etonians chronological style (although with Eton’s vast alumni list I can see the reasoning). I feel that the Old Harrovians and the Old Rugbeians in alphabetical order is also less ‘browsing’ friendly than the categorisation by type. Sorry for the length of the message. I got carried away.Kwib 12:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

A reply is at your talk page Xn4 21:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT correction

Hi there. I noticed this edit where you added a DEFAULTSORT to Arthur Conan Doyle. Unfortunately, there was (a) already an existing DEFAULTSORT and (b) your DEFAULTSORT was incorrect. He should be sorted under "Conan Doyle, Arthur", not "Doyle, Arthur Conan". Having said that, I've looked through your contributions and seen that you've made a fair number of DEFAULTSORT additions. Would you be interested in looking at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Polbot 3? Eventually, there will be lists of people articles for editors to help with in selecting the correct DEFAULTSORT option from a list of possibilities. Would you be interested in helping out with stuff like that? Carcharoth 23:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Carcharoth. I'm sorry that I didn't notice there was an existing DEFAULTSORT for Doyle, and I'm always happy to be corrected, but would you mind explaining your view that "Doyle, Arthur Conan" is incorrect? His surname was Doyle. Conan was a given name and was not used by his father Charles Doyle or his son Kingsley Doyle. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography lists him under 'D' as ‘Doyle, Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan (1859–1930)’. Regards, Xn4 23:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Good point. See Talk:Arthur Conan Doyle#Conan Doyle or Doyle? and hopefully something will be sorted. Carcharoth 00:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Institut Le Rosey article

I have moved this discussion to Talk:Institut Le Rosey. Xn4 15:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to the wikiproject - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards --Mcginnly | Natter 19:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC) {{WikiProject Architecture Bulletin}}

Sometimes

Your day is just s(*&, but then you see a glint in the mud and it sparkles. Thanks Victuallers 21:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Jeremy Bamber assessment

I have upgraded it to mid. Sorry being an American we don't get much international news. If you found an more articles that should be given a higher rating please fell free to contact me, or you can just upgraded them to an appropriate category yourself. Thanks, Jmm6f488 19:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the appointment. I was most pleased. You might want to know that I have painstakingly created List of Victoria Crosses by School, which shows a comparison between schools (fully cited of course). I would hope that many more schools will be added over time. I have noticed that it already has an AFD tag.. now that is keen! Am I allowed to be in the discussion for deletion as the creator? Kwib 21:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi. My reply is here. Xn4 22:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Many thanks for blocking Benhunjan1. Xn4 00:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

You do realize I'm not an admin, and therefore all I did was ask for the ban, right? I didn't ban him myself... I don't have that power. But no problem :-) Gscshoyru 00:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Ralph Firman

The issues you have with the infobox, and the changes you have just made to it, which have not improved it in my opinion, will be referred to the WP, where a concensus will be established. Bretonbanquet 19:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

That should be consensus (Latin consentire, not census). Xn4 19:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm not looking for your grammar corrections right now. Bretonbanquet 20:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Then you may be pleased to notice that your grammar was not corrected. Xn4 01:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
How did I know you'd say exactly that? If you could use this page solely to discuss the Ralph Firman article, rather than shortcomings in my spelling, it would be appreciated. I hope you don't find that misleading. Bretonbanquet 09:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I should say your meaning is clear enough. You believe you have the right to propagate spelling mistakes on Wikipedia without correction. Xn4 16:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe nothing of the sort, naturally. If I did, that would be none of your business. I believe I have the right to tell you that I don't care whether or not I am corrected, particularly when it is done in an apparently ill-mannered fashion. I assume you can tell the difference. By the way, if this discussion continues to be diverted away from Ralph Firman, it will no doubt be deleted. I notice you didn't contribute to the discussion at WPF1. Bretonbanquet 21:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
So did you miss me? You are full of surprises. Xn4 02:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Shaftesbury and the Popish Plot

Thanks a million times for your response to this and your brilliant debate with Clio the Muse. He who must be obeyed 11:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words! Xn4 03:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:User:TomasBat/Welcome

Thanks for the nice message. I´m glad you liked it. TomasBat 21:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Snails and things!

Thanks so much for your birthday wishes.

I spent some lovely summers as a little girl with my family on holiday in the Loire valley, so I, too, have a taste for French food; yes, even snails, though I confess all I could ever really taste was the garlic butter in which they were cooked! I was slightly put off a couple of years ago when I had some that were not properly cleaned. I can still recall crunching on grit-yuck! Clio the Muse 23:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Clio, you are positively naughty! It is your birthday and you need your rest. However, I'm worried about this grit, so I propose that you shall eat no snails from someone's garden in future. There is no grit in pâté de foie gras d'oie, saumon fumé, or crème caramel. Enjoy. Xn4 23:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
It is now! I go to bed soon, but I have one or two matters to clear up first. They were good Burgundian snails, Xn4, of that you can be sure! Anyway, you make my mouth water, you really do; so I'm off for a snack before I do any more. Regards Clio the Muse 23:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

St George

What a lovely award. Thank you so much for your kindness. ♥ Clio the Muse 22:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

EnglandWales ! Xn4 23:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Islamic Emirate of Albania

Your input here would be appreciated. --Fredrick day 22:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, Fredrick, it's done. Xn4 23:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Lady Jane Grey Trial

I am just curious what your source is/was for the addition to the Jane Grey article. Where did you find such detailed information about her trial? I was not aware that any English printed publication contained so much detail. PhD Historian 06:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi, PhD Historian. It was mostly from the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. You were right to prompt me, I've added all the references to the Lady Jane Grey article. regards, Xn4 14:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. The online version of the ODNB does not contain that bit of info, but the entry for LJG in the online version was written by Alison Plowden. I wonder whether the article in the current print version of the ODNB might have been written by someone else? Anyway ... My interest stems from my current work on an academic biography of LJG. I've been working recently on transcribing and translating the Latin court documents that survive from her trial, and they seem to contradict the ODNB article you cited. But that is not big issue for right now. My work thus far suggests that much of what we think we "know" about LJG today is in fact the product of myths and legends and is not borne out by the primary source evidence. Plowden's biography of Jane relies heavily in secondary sources, I might note. Re-writing the ODNB entry on LJG will be a future project of mine, as soon as the bio is published (2008). Thanks! Keep up the good work! PhD Historian 00:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

You'll see that I added the reference to Alison Plowden's article earlier today, and (indeed) wikilinked her name. But I'm puzzled - which particular bit of info which I have cited from ODNB does the article not contain?
I'm glad to hear that someone, at least, is working on Jane from the original sources. I'm curious, where are the MS trial documents? When you publish something, I hope you'll post some details on your talk page. regards, Xn4 01:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

The online version of the ODNB, in regard to Jane's trial, says simply "Jane, together with Guildford Dudley and two more of his brothers, stood trial for treason on 19 November. The proceedings were brief and formal and the accused duly condemned, but the emperor's ambassador reported that Jane's life would be spared." You may note first that the date is incorrect, though perhaps Ms Plowden amended it to New Style. But there is no mention in the online version of Plowden's article of Thomas White or Edward Stanley, the location of the trial, etc. But upon checking your footnotes, I see that you obtained that information from other articles, not the LJG article. That makes more sense, since I knew that Plowden had not examined the original manuscript trial records. They are in the National Archives Public Record Office at Kew, filed with the records from the Court of King's Bench. And I do indeed plan to post something on my Talk page as soon as the book becomes available. There will also be a posting placed on my personal website, www.somegreymatter.com. If you have not seen that site, you might be interested in having a look at it. As soon as the September issue of OUP's "Notes and Queries" comes out, I will be adding a page to my site on the subject of LJG's date of birth, arguing that the traditional date in October 1537 is quite wrong. PhD Historian 02:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Excellent! I wish you success. (You'll see from my references that White's and Stanley's involvement in Jane's trial are drawn from their separate ODNB articles.) regards, Xn4 02:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC).

W.G. Holmes

No worries mate it's all good so long as we have an article on the man. I'm not bothered too much about the credit or edit count. The article you wrote is good as well. Thanks for the politeness though i appreciate that. Tristan benedict 15:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding! Xn4 15:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Award

Thank you for giving me that knowledge. I have now put the award on Clio the Muse's page. Philip the Arab 16:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

No trouble, Philip. Xn4 20:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 5