Wikipedia:XfD today
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Speedy deletion candidates
[edit]Articles
[edit]![]() |
- City Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unsourced and random list of airports that seemed to have been deemed "city".
Should be a disambiguation page at most, and at City airport without capital A as it is not a proper noun Elshad (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Brock Harris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lesser known actor and producer. Not enough notability for a standalone article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. CycloneYoris talk! 08:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris talk! 08:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sourav Sarswa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Frost 07:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Frost 07:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. There are not enough third-party sources. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Exercise Indus Shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see how this meets NEVENTCRITERIA. There are several issues. I don’t see evidence of WP:LASTING impact, or even WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability and WP is not a newspaper. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Partha Chatterjee (scholar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks significant coverage. Notability issues. Other than the primary sources cited, nothing reliable found when performed web search. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- 1M1B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears like one of the many organizations recognized by UN.
Parameters:
No significance: apart from being a recognized organization by the UN. Lots and lots of organizations are recognized by the UN.
FAILS NORG Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep with a warning to the nominator. The nom made exactly the same arguments for deletion 35 days ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1M1B and seems to have expected others to do the footwork of making clear deletion rationale, then and now — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ota Kohoutek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG criteria. Lack of sources, no significant coverage. Insignificant footballer with only 12 starts in professional football, last being in May 2022, more than 2 years ago. Maybe one day he will restart his career, but WP:NOTJUSTYET. FromCzech (talk) 05:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- There were added references and sources to prove media coverage. At the end of the article there is statement about WP:STUB, which is perfectly sufficient and says that anyone can improve the site by expanding it. Pospeak (talk) 06:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Notability still not proven, sources still unsufficient. FromCzech (talk) 07:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Notability has been proved by adding 3 references and 3 external links. That is more than many others footballer pages. Perfectly sufficient for stub. Pospeak (talk) 15:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Notability still not proven, sources still unsufficient. FromCzech (talk) 07:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Czech Republic. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 14:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- 8 resources of total were added to the page. Pospeak (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - 3 references and 5 external links are sufficient enough for stub. — Note to closing admin: Pospeak (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Philippe Beaulne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
11 years after the last AfD, a search for sources today yielded very little despite claims he gets significant coverage. Nothing in google news and only 1 line mentions in google books. Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 06:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Africa, Romania, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 06:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Bellinzona Ladies Open (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A very small tournament that seems to get no third party coverage. Even a plain google search just reveals primary sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Tennis, and Switzerland. LibStar (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- ITF Women's Circuit UBS Thurgau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A very small tournament that seems to get no third party coverage. Even a plain google search just reveals primary sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Tennis, and Switzerland. LibStar (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Elvish Yadav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability issue. Winning one show and couple music videos not enough. Xegma(talk) 05:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nokia Morph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Concept design for a mobile phone which was never manufacturable (it relied on fantasy tech) and which, in retrospect, had little to no meaningful influence on the industry. Some limited news coverage when it was announced in 2008, but nothing substantial since then. Omphalographer (talk) 04:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Technology, and Computing. Omphalographer (talk) 04:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- History of Chandigarh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This incomplete article is basically WP:SYNTH and WP:OR that theorizes a connection between modern Chandigarh and ancient Indian civilizations. ("The land...was probably a part of the Kuru Kingdom...") It existed for many years as a redirect, but was recently reverted. The article fails WP:GNG, both on inadequate sourcing and on WP:NOT, so a delete would be appropriate, but restoring a stable redirect to Chandigarh#History established through AfD consensus would be acceptable too. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Haryana, and Punjab. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Chandigarh#History. It's much better than this inappropriate spin-out. Deletion would also be fine, but I think an AfD-enforced redirect is probably going to be more useful for preventing recreation. -- asilvering (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Kelvin Mullarkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and is based on primary sources. Google books search comes up with 4 hits, but they don't appear to be indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and England. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep double national champion per #4 of WP:NMOTORSPORT. SpacedFarmer (talk) 10:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain how this meets WP:SPORTCRIT Geschichte (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @SpacedFarmer, This person seems to be a double champion in the second tier of British speedway racing, which I do not believe is comparably significant to something like Super GT or the British Superbike Championship. I have started a discussion at WT:MOTORSPORT about the notability of motorcycle speedway riders. Please also note that WP:NMOTORSPORT is intended more as a guideline for which articles should require a far more thorough WP:BEFORE search rather than an argument in-and-of itself for keeping or deleting an article. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 21:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. How in-depth are your WP:BEFORE searches? There is regular coverage in the British papers, see here. Specifically: Mullarkey back with a bang (Harlow Star, 1986); Mullarkey back at Rye! (Mercury, 1984); and Kevin joins Canterbury (Mercury and Reformer, 1983). BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ivy Wolk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Given this article was recently proposed for deletion twice by User:BarntToust before those were contested by User:Mushy Yank on the basis of this being "not uncontroversial", I figured this ought to be formally discussed. This article was only created back in April and covers an actress who has only been featured in two WP:RECENT films (one released this year) and two recent television series. It fails the WP:GNG because most of the sources are primarily noting the actress was cast in the media mentioned (most of which are a client page and a social media post). The article fails to establish significant independent coverage of this subject herself aside from purely noting her roles and some brief trivia on a college. If anyone is interested in expanding upon the contents, I would suggest moving this to the draftspace (where it should have been started) to allow for further edits to be made to establish potential notability, especially as many of their roles are fairly recent or still upcoming. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Women. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Internet, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator's Comment: While this may not be particularly relevant to this discussion, I think it is worth noting that this article's subject apparently took issue with the prior deletion proposal (seen here and here), and based on the comments from an obsessed IP here, I think it is suffice to say that there is some bias that exists but ignores Wikipedia policy. I don't think this would have any impact on this outcome here, though including for transparency. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. There's only one source that covers Wolk specifically - the Variety article. All other sources only have brief mentions, or don't mention Wolk at all. The fact that half the information in this already short article needs better sources isn't encouraging either. Cortador (talk) 06:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Moral Conundrum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed for NPP, does not pass NBOOK or the GNG. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-published e-book with no reviews in WP:RS. (I think you could have just PROD'd this one.) -- asilvering (talk) 04:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Massoud Massoud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't find that he meets the notability policy; I couldn't find any sources. فيصل (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and Syria. فيصل (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Michel Yatim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't find that he meets the notability policy; I couldn't find any sources. فيصل (talk) 03:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and Syria. فيصل (talk) 03:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Habib Bahmani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability, I googled him and didn't find much except few videos and few other things in social media. I also think the page is created by himself. trying to make a resume for himself. the account is banned now. I don't think just coaching a team is enough to make him notable. the article says he won a medal at World Cup (which I can't confirm) but even if that's correct, World Cup is a secondary tournament after the World Championship. Sports2021 (talk) 03:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Iran. Sports2021 (talk) 03:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ranveer Allahbadia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see anything notable about this individual when it comes to WP:GNG. Yes, Narendra Modi had a banter with him but he had broader interaction with a bunch of individuals during the same period of time and none of those individuals are notable either.
The cited sources are of three types: primary sources, Godi media, and passing mention. Ratnahastin (talk) 03:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Delhi, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable podcast. No significant coverage. Fails GNG. C F A 💬 02:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, is "Spotify for Podcasters" even RS? Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Christianity. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Zero coverage by reliable sources. It's all just non-independent podcasting sites. Cortador (talk) 07:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Bowie Jane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 01:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Television. Joeykai (talk) 01:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, Australia, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, passes WP:GNG per these sources [1][2][3][4] which give fairly significant coverage to the subject. There are also other sources available that when combined further their notability for an article. Ednabrenze (talk) 08:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, source 8 above is a brief album review in Billboard (fine I guess), the rest are about the season of Big Brother and mention this person in relation to the others on the show. Not exactly significant coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 18:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge: to the Big Brother season? Seems to have survived long enough on the show, but I'm not sure they're notable outside of that context. Doesn't seem to meet musical notability requirements either. The Billboard review is fine, but it's used for musical notability, then we go onto the TV show sources; you have to pick one sort of notability, you can't stack them. Being almost notable as a DJ and almost notable as a TV personality don't add up to an article here. I'm not fussed if this gets !deleted either. Oaktree b (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- My-HiME soundtracks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NALBUMS DonaldD23 talk to me 01:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Anime and manga, and Japan. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Singapore women's national under-18 softball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:NORG due to a lack of secondary sourcing about the team itself. The only source is primary and does not cover the team itself in any event. Let'srun (talk) 01:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Softball, and Singapore. Let'srun (talk) 01:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Germany women's national under-18 softball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any sources suggesting this subject meets the WP:NORG or WP:GNG. The only sources currently in the article are WP:PRIMARY and are not about the team in any event. Let'srun (talk) 00:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Softball, and Germany. Let'srun (talk) 00:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- North Korea women's national softball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find the needed WP:SIGCOV for the subject to meet WP:NORG or the WP:GNG. The only sources in the article today are primary. Let'srun (talk) 00:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Softball, and North Korea. Let'srun (talk) 00:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Festival de Guitarra de Barcelona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Marked for notability concerns since Feb 2024. Nothing in google news search, and 1 line mentions in google books search. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Events, and Spain. LibStar (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Uzbekistan national baseball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:NORG or WP:GNG for this subject, which has been tagged as lacking any sources since last year. Let'srun (talk) 00:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Baseball, and Uzbekistan. Let'srun (talk) 00:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files
[edit]- File:SpySheriffPopUp.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thisismyrofl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
We typically don't need to use non-free images to illustrate general concepts. I suggest removal from scareware. There are some examples from [5] that are below the threshold of originality. Furthermore, the SpySheriff article already has a different non-free image, so there is no need to keep this one on that article either. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Bodwin-family.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbodwin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is redundant and unfeatured in any article. Please notify if you are working on an article using this file. Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Swindon town fc badge 1969.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Foxhill (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Swindon town fc badge 1971.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Foxhill (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Swindon town fc badge 1989.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Foxhill (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Swindon town fc badge 1990.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Foxhill (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Contrary to the claim that says that the logos are "discussed in articles as listed on this page", these former crests are not subject to sourced critical commentary in History of Swindon Town F.C., where they are used. In order to satisfy the contextual significance criterion, an additional non-free item must either "itself [be] the subject of sourced commentary in the article" or "where only by including such non-free content, can the reader identify an object, style, or behavior, that is a subject of discussion in the article", as "only a single item of non-free content meets" WP:NFCC#8. Per WP:NFC#cite_note-4, "The use of historical logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the historical logo itself is described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo." None of these requirements occur in the aforementioned article. ✗plicit 06:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- They are discussed in Swindon_Town_F.C.#Crest as stated on the image pages. If you feel they shouldn't be in the History article, feel free to remove them from it. Nanonic (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all fail WP:NFCC#8 as do not significantly enhance the articles (even with the paragraphs of partially sourced text about club logo history on Swindon_Town_F.C.#Crest), and WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non free items in an article (current logo suffices on Swindon_Town_F.C., and no logo is fine on History of Swindon Town F.C.). Joseph2302 (talk) 09:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]NEW NOMINATIONS
[edit]Template:Estonia-record-label-stub
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: little potential to grow. Two members to be categorized to {{Estonia-company-stub}} Estopedist1 (talk) 06:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:NUMTOT Wikipedians
[edit]- Propose merging Category:NUMTOT Wikipedians to Category:Wikipedians interested in transportation
- Nominator's rationale: Overly narrow user category per WP:USERCATNO. Mclay1 (talk) 11:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- If merged, I suggest that the page content also be merged, so that interested Wikipedians can at least see "what links here" on the NUMTOT userboxes. – Fayenatic London 17:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete without merging Userboxes like "This user is a gay for transport. 🚂🚆🚌🚍" are irrelevant fannishness, not a vehicle for collaboration. It should not populate any kind of collaboration-focused category, and this entire category fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function, a problem that moving up will not solve. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is a fair point. Deletion of the category would also be a good outcome (without deleting the userboxes). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: delete or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Intel people
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Intel people to Category:People associated with Intel
- Nominator's rationale: Needs a rename of some sort, as "Intel people" could also reference to people who work in intelligence. Perhaps "People associated with Intel", though not sure if that is better or not. Natg 19 (talk) 16:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- If renamed rather to Category:People of Intel. I am not sure though if anyone would misunderstand this as people work in intelligence. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per pattern in Category:People by company in the United States as the suggested ambiguity is more theoretical than real. – Fayenatic London 21:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Malaysian podcasts
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Malaysian podcasts to Category:Mass media in Malaysia
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only 1 entry LibStar (talk) 02:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Mass media in Malacca City
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Mass media in Malacca City to Category:Mass media in Malaysia
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only 1 entry. LibStar (talk) 02:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support, this is not helpful for navigation. But in fact the category can be deleted because the article is already in Category:Radio stations in Malaysia. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, seems to be part of Category:Mass media in Malaysia by city and the wider Category:Mass media by city tree. It doesn't make too much sense to deal with it on its own outside of that tree. CMD (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women translation 2
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Overlapping categories Mason (talk) 01:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge, 4 of the 5 pages are in both categories already. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Women
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Women to Category:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women
- Propose renaming Category:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Women (Ghana) to Category:Wiki Loves Women (Ghana)
- Nominator's rationale: Shouldn't these categories be named "Category:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women"? Mason (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge/rename, aligning with standard naming conventions. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2021
[edit]- Propose merging/renaming Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2021 to Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore
- Propose merging Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2023 to Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore
- Propose merging Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2022 to Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore
- Nominator's rationale: I think we should bundle all these underpopulated categories together Mason (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2023 has been moved without leaving a redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- The same editor tagged Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2021 and Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore 2022 as a kind of CSD G7 but they weren't the category creator so I untagged the pages. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Category:Wikipedia Feminism and Folklore. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge, the target contains 8 pages so it does not require diffusion. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Deadly embrace
[edit]From the history, it looks like this was in reference something Dijkstra said about deadlocks (the computer science topic), but this phrase isn't actually mentioned in the latter article, nor can I find any other coherent topic to redirect it to, so it doesn't make much sense.
If we delete it, lookups of "deadly embrace" will show something like this, which would probably be better than what is shown now.
-- Joy (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Newman!
[edit]- Hello, Newman! → Newman (Seinfeld) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Only mentioned once at the target phrase article, claiming to be "Jerry's trademark phrase" for Newman. Is the phrase trademarked? No clue, as there is no reference anywhere in the paragraph where this is stated to be true. Otherwise implausible for people to use this phrase to reach the article about Newman from Seinfeld, before searchers attempt to search for Newman (Seinfeld) (as the character's name is in the phrase in question). Utopes (talk / cont) 17:14, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - plausible search term, and there is no other plausible target. "target phrase"? Did you mean "target article"? Jay 💬 17:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. I've since removed the mention of the phrase from the target article as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh well, retarget to Jerry Seinfeld (character)#Newman. List of catchphrases in American and British mass media has a FOX website source Most popular sitcom catchphrases of all time, from 'Ayyyy!' to 'Hello, Newman' which gives a Page not found though, and may need to be dug up from the archives. Jay 💬 17:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also removed the [totally unsourced] mention from Jerry Seinfeld (character)#Newman as well. The only context present there refers to an erroneous claim that it's "Jerry's trademark phrase", with no citation about a trademark. Beyond that, I'm highly doubtful that this list based on a seemingly subjective metric of "most popular" sitcom catchphrases of all time, would be anything of a reliable source to substantiate any mention. Newman's personality can be demonstrated totally well enough without it. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- "Jerry's trademark phrase" uses the figurative/colloquial meaning of trademark. It is not a legal assertion that Jerry uses the phrase to identify a particular company's product and differentiate it from other companies' products. SilverLocust 💬 05:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. The content should be added back. The archived source link is here. Jay 💬 17:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- "Jerry's trademark phrase" uses the figurative/colloquial meaning of trademark. It is not a legal assertion that Jerry uses the phrase to identify a particular company's product and differentiate it from other companies' products. SilverLocust 💬 05:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also removed the [totally unsourced] mention from Jerry Seinfeld (character)#Newman as well. The only context present there refers to an erroneous claim that it's "Jerry's trademark phrase", with no citation about a trademark. Beyond that, I'm highly doubtful that this list based on a seemingly subjective metric of "most popular" sitcom catchphrases of all time, would be anything of a reliable source to substantiate any mention. Newman's personality can be demonstrated totally well enough without it. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh well, retarget to Jerry Seinfeld (character)#Newman. List of catchphrases in American and British mass media has a FOX website source Most popular sitcom catchphrases of all time, from 'Ayyyy!' to 'Hello, Newman' which gives a Page not found though, and may need to be dug up from the archives. Jay 💬 17:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. I've since removed the mention of the phrase from the target article as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Do we do soft redirects to Wikiquote? (Not sure if a target exists, not sure if we do such soft redirects these days ... just asking based on our Wiktionary soft redirects' existence.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- We do do soft redirects to Wikiquote when that's the best target. No opinion (at the moment) on whether that's true in this case. Thryduulf (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I just looked at Wikiquote for a bit: Seems it's more focused on non-serial media, such as films, instead of reoccurring media, such as TV series. What I mean is if a quote is stated more than once in a media (such as multiple episodes in a series), it seems there is no clear target for the quote on Wiktionary. (There may be character pages ... but I haven't figured that out yet.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- We do do soft redirects to Wikiquote when that's the best target. No opinion (at the moment) on whether that's true in this case. Thryduulf (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
BFGv3.14
[edit]that's from the 2005 movie that i keep trying to forget exists, but the name is not mentioned there, or in the current target, or anywhere on wikipedia. retarget there, delete and act like it never existed, or take some other option i failed to consider? i'm leaning towards deletion cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Just notified of this discussion at the current and proposed target talk pages. Jay 💬 13:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Hellish invasion of Mars
[edit]- Hellish invasion of Mars → Doom 3 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
that's a plot point since the first game, but there might also be other instances of the evil world known as h*ck deciding to attack mars that i'm forgetting. opinions on retargeting it to anything besides the series' article? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know how vague it is, but it's not a believable search. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Just tagged this with {{R with history}}. Jay 💬 13:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Monsoon Revolution
[edit]- Monsoon Revolution → Non-cooperation movement (2024) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Non-cooperation movement (2024) is not known as "Monsoon Revolution". There is no source verify that. In that way, this redirect is WP:OR. Also Monsoon Revolution is the name of a book "Monsoon Revolution: Republicans, Sultans, and Empires in Oman, 1965-1976". Redirect this to the subject creates confusion. It needs to be deleted. Mehedi Abedin 04:49, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I found at least one source that is calling it "Monsoon Revolution". [6] Za-ari-masen (talk) 05:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The above source had been removed from the article. I also found the one I had originally heard this term used in [7] (just after the 4 minute mark in the audio) and added a note about the alternative name back to the intro of Non-cooperation movement (2024). Given that it has also been used for the Dhofar War (which is what the book is apparently about), perhaps this should be made into a disambiguation page between those two? -- Beland (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Disambiguate: There are only three hits for the name that pertain to the NCM in Bangladesh. The name is used for other events as well as mentioned above. PadFoot (talk) 07:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Disambiguate: In that case disambiguation is the better idea considering what Beland and PadFoot2008 said. Mehedi Abedin 07:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: It doesn't seem like this is the name that sticks. I did notice that an article was made entitled July 36 where it is said that that is what Bangladeshis calling the date of Sheikh Hasina's removal. I think we're seeing a scenario akin to the Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine. Image2012 (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
They bite, they fight, they bite and bite and fight
[edit]- They bite, they fight, they bite and bite and fight → Itchy & Scratchy & Marge (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
A replica redirect of an unmentioned lyric from the show in question. This lyric, which was not mentioned anywhere in December of last year, is still not mentioned anywhere. Speedy deletion via G12 was tossed as a possibility during the previous RfD: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30#They fight, and bite. They fight, and bite, and fight. Fight, fight, fight. Bite, bite, bite. The Itchy & Scratchy Show! but the target still provides zero context for this search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment this redirect is definitely not a G12 candidate. Thryduulf (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Tossed around for the previous redirect's RfD*; this is a different redirect than what was discussed then. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as ambiguous. "Itchy & Scratchy & Marge", I'm pretty certain, isn't the only The Simpsons episode to feature the Itchy & Scratchy theme; so does "The Itchy & Scratchy & Poochie Show" (albeit in altered format). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively, retarget to The Itchy & Scratchy Show, though this may be an implausible
{{R from lyric}}
. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively, retarget to The Itchy & Scratchy Show, though this may be an implausible
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Templates and Modules
[edit]Not enough blue links to warrant a template. All the red links are not notable articles (we do not require separate team articles for this low coverage tournament) and 2 of the blue links are at AFD too. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Matthew 16 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
There are already forward/backward navigational links in the infobox on Matthew 16, and the handful of other articles linked from this template are linked from appropriate places in that article. There apparently used to be a large number of articles on the verses of this chapter, but these are now redirects, so I think this template is no longer needed. -- Beland (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Miscellany
[edit]Deletion review
[edit]There is a source/reference that in my opinion provides WP:SIGCOV for the above deleted article. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 07:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)