Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/August 2024

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.

August 31

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: Hvaldimir

[edit]
Article: Hvaldimir (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Famous Russian spy in Norwegian waters Abcmaxx (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Attention needed) RD: Sonny King

[edit]
Article: Sonny King (wrestler) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Post Wrestling
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American professional wrestler. 240F:7A:6253:1:CCE:9B6D:FAA4:665C (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait some cn tags needs to be resolved. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Stevie Cameron

[edit]
Article: Stevie Cameron (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBC, Toronto Star
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Canadian journalist and author. 240F:7A:6253:1:A178:C2E3:6140:3A54 (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose multiple cn tags and Awards section needs sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Obi Ndefo

[edit]
Article: Obi Ndefo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1], [2]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Happily888 (talk) 01:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose just around 175 or so word long prose. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Russia, 22 people die after a Mil Mi-8 (pictured) crashes in Kamchatka. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ A Mil Mi-8 helicopter crashes in Kamchatka, Russia, leaving 22 people dead.
News source(s): BBC - Moscow Times - Euromaidan Press
Credits:

Nominator's comments: 22 people are dead after a tour helicopter crashed over a volcano in Kamchatka, Russia. The article is largely okay, disregarding the fact that it may need expansion. — Knightoftheswords 15:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, notable recent accident with fatalities and property loss. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability, Oppose on quality. While its notable due to the high number of fatalities, the article is still tagged as a stub and more information is needed if possible.

Changing to full Support. Article is now in a decent shape. Cheers. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 20:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support article is in a good shape and death toll is significant enough. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sol Bamba

[edit]
Article: Sol Bamba (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former Soccer Player/Coach Haris920 (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Fatman Scoop

[edit]
Article: Fatman Scoop (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Billboard, NBC News
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American rapper. 240F:7A:6253:1:344E:215E:92:A3B3 (talk) 16:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Ready article has a lot of CN tags, also cause of death isn't known yet Scu ba (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Needs work per Ad Orientem. Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Discography and awards sections need more sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) X blocked in Brazil

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Brazilian investigation into Elon Musk (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: X is blocked in Brazil. (Post)
Alternative blurb: X is blocked in Brazil amidst an investigation ruled by Supreme Federal Court.
Alternative blurb II: X is blocked in Brazil after Elon Musk refuses to comply with a court order issued by the Supreme Federal Court.
News source(s): The New York Times AP News
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Unusual block for a democratic country. ArionStar (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I've been watching this one, and this is more about Musk refusing to comply with a judge that is upholding Brazilian law regarding social media and misinformation. Its basically more a situation of his own choosing rather than some new massive draconian measure (like when Turkey did it some years back), and as such, while its in the news, its not the type of story we should be posting because the situation was entirely avoidable (Musk just had to give the court a legal representative to deal with the case, he refused). --Masem (t) 12:12, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "… upholding Brazilian law…" LOL! ArionStar (talk) 12:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, the original order back in 2020 was due to specific accounts that were ordered blocked due to misinformation including threats to the judiciary. Brazil doesn't have as wide open a free speech policy as the US, so while controversial they were still reasonable under that. Masem (t) 12:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Brazil has reasonable free speech - I don't think comparing it to somewhere as backwards as the United States, where free speech is out of control and protects hate speech, is useful. Nfitz (talk) 22:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is complete nonsense and entirely of Musk's making. This has literally nothing to do with "free speech" and everything to do with Musk's refusal to comply with a basic court order issued by the independent judiciary to appoint a legal representative in Brazil. AusLondonder (talk) 12:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:POV, irrespective of the motives/arguments this is a pretty big decision PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This just another case of Musk throwing a tantrum. Also failure to appoint a legal representative is not censorship nor anything to do with a democratic deficit. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Musk being Musk. Skyshiftertalk 13:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This was a decision of Brazil's supreme court, can't really be entirely attributed to "just Elon drama", this is a major ruling PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Given it's a case of "Brazil makes a legal request, Musk ignores the legal request instead of engaging like any reasonable person would and Brazil escalates in response", it really is just Elon drama. --2001:8003:1C20:8C00:A599:8FED:E2E0:7A4A (talk) 10:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The discussion above provides a perfect example of editors using their own personal opinions and biases instead of relying on coverage by WP:RS. Whatever we think about Musk as an individual is completely irrelevant, or at least it should be. Even if one accepts that Musk is 100% at fault in this episode, the result is that X is blocked in Brazil, an event that is covered as a top story by pretty much every news outlet in the world and which affects the seventh most populous country in the world. Nsk92 (talk) 14:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We are not a newspaper and simply don't follow what is published in headlines. ITN is supposed to feature quality articles that happen to be in the news, not to be where we are reporting on news, and that's why simply being a highly published story is not sufficient for being in ITN. Besides this being an issue with Musk being Musk, which has become routine news, we do not have any good article target here that discusses the entire matter (starting with the original court order to block certain accounts). — Masem (t) 15:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral point of view is policy, and the blurb is total clickbait. RAN1 (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nsk92: when I initially opposed the nomination the target article was Censorship of Twitter at the time of my comment, which was a highly biased target to nominate and my argument was that this issue is not to do with censorship but more so to do with the failure to adhere to a court ruling; this was also the basis of other editors' arguments and reasonings to oppose too. Abcmaxx (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose just the Brazilian government throwing a tantrum. Scu ba (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but a lot of things can be viewed as just "governments throwing a tantrum", doesn't affect notability. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its banned because Musk refused to provide legal representation to the court, not because the state wanted to block X completely. If we're talking about the free speech implications, that should have been the story when the court first ordered social media there to block specific accounts, several months ago. Masem (t) 15:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Not voting either way at the moment, but the comments here about this being simply a dispute with Musk seem to miss the mark. This situation IS largely of Musk's doing, but that doesn't mean the impacts are not relevant to post here. That's similar to saying that a war between two countries wouldn't be ITN material if it had grown out of a private dispute between the leaders of two countries. Whether or not it's "censorship" really shouldn't matter much. This discussion should be about if we believe X being blocked is noteworthy enough to post. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose purely on article quality. The newly created article is only barely more than a stub. However, and whatever our opinions of the case, it's potential to impact the debate over free speech and the regulatory power of the state is both obvious and highly significant. Support on merits. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ad Orientem the article has been improved since then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @RodRabelo7 Thanks for the ping. Moved to support. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on merits. Regardless of who did what, or whether the situation was avoidable, Xitter being blocked in one of the world's largest countries is definitely notable. However, the blurb is a bit short, and linking to Censorship in Brazil instead of Brazil is a MOS:EASTEREGG that should ideally be avoided. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Support/Wait Didn't something happen in Turkey a few weeks ago where an Instagram ban was instituted but reverted a few days later? I'm wondering if this is going to be a similar situation and will be walked back in the next day or two. I'd err on waiting to post, at least until Monday. Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The block occurred due to a lack of response to the request to appoint a representative in the country, and not due to censorship per se. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 17:24, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @A.WagnerC and...? An ITT doesn't need to be an act of censorship. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedia is not a stage for billionaires to throw tantrums ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Article is extremely stubby. Does not even mention A.Wagner's point above that the trigger for the block was X/Twitter's refusal to appoint a legal representative (nor does it mention X/Twitter's reasons for not complying). Also oppose "Brazil" linking to "Censorship in Brazil" - are we really going to parrot Musk's POV here? If we post this (once an up-to-standard, neutral article exists), let's have readers make up their own mind whether it's a censorship issue or not.
  • EDIT: moving to Weak Support following expansion of the article. Still disagree with linking to "Censorship of Twitter". Khuft (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Khuft the article has been improved since then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean the government demanding the removal of certain political and religious figures from the site is a pretty clear case of censorship. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As I mentioned in another discussion, there are different conceptions on what constituted freedom of speech and hate speech. In Continental Europe (France, Germany) platforms are required to act against hate speech, and this is not considered censorship. I'm not really familiar with Brazilian conceptions of freedom of speech, but from what I gather from the article & the news, it seems to follow a similar concept of going against hate speech in the context of the invasion of the Brazilian Congress. Khuft (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per A.WagnerC. This happened because Musk failed to appoint a legal representative of Twitter in Brazil, which, to me, is not something we should post. Also, the article is not ready for the main page. Gödel2200 (talk) 17:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Help Can anyone help to improve the article? Alternative blurb added. ArionStar (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article is way too short and underdeveloped for ITN Hungry403 (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs to be improved, it is very interesting for ITN. ArionStar (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is in better shape now. ArionStar (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hungry403 the article has been improved since then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support. We should not evaluate the merit of the case as being merely a "tantrum" from Musk (much less from Brazil, shame on whoever said that), nor should we consider it as a case of censorship, which it clearly is not. The fact is that the event received extensive coverage worldwide. The New York Times and the Associated Press even used a breaking news alert to report it. Furthermore, it is a watershed moment, as it involves a democratic nation blocking a social network after it disobeyed legal orders, and Brazil represents a significant portion of Twitter's total user base. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How many times has Musk caused a problem with a government? I’m not certain but this definitely isn’t the first time and I dont believe we posted the other ones. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 08:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a blocking affecting one the largest X markets. Period. ArionStar (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t believe any blocking of any social media platform in only certain countries is ITN worthy, if it was a worldwide ban that would be different. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose not something blurbworthy IMO. If we didn't posted the news of the arrest of the founder of two popular social media sites then we should not post news about closure of a social media platform in a single country. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @PrinceofPunjab: which arrest? ArionStar (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ArionStar I am talking about this one. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 15:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a random country. A major democracy and one of the largest Twitter markets. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support – Widespread coverage, one of the most popular websites in Brazil blocked by its Supreme Court which is unusual for the country. For the editors saying this is just a "tantrum" for Musk... it's a judicial/political decision made by Brazil in response to Musk, not just Musk shitposting on X. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 15:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ready? ArionStar (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's not even remotely a consensus to post, so no. The Kip (contribs) 20:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This may well happen in a number of other countries if Musk carries on taking X down the rabbit hole of supporting some seriously unpleasant stuff. And we can't really post every time Musk has a tantrum, or the whole of ITN would be full of it. Black Kite (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We can't predict that this may well happen in a number of other countries if Musk carries on and this sort of prediction shouldn't affect the notability of Brazil's current ban. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 18:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No, we can't, but what happens if we post this and then Musk does something so egregious that other countries follow suit? We'd have a problem. But regardless, I don't think this rises to the level of ITN anyway. Black Kite (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The blocking is still ongoing and I imagine there will be millions in money losses in the coming days. ArionStar (talk) 19:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see that X is losing a significant amount of money immediately here; I suppose some losses are possible if Brazilian advertisers withdraw from the platform (or possibly companies who do a large amount of their business in Brazil). Nevertheless, this is what happens when the owner of a company believes it is above the law. Black Kite (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem. Not very interesting in my opinion. C F A 💬 20:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Per most of the above. It's not really worth mentioning in my opinion. This has nothing to do with censorship as Brazil blocked the site in response to Musk failing to obey a simple court order. If the arrest of Pavel Durov or another, Montana blocking TikTok wasn't posted on the ITN, a social media site that just got blocked in a single country shouldn't be posted either. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 20:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - big story with huge ramifications. I'm not sure why it's being compared to a sub-national jurisdiction like Montana, which has no ability to enforce a ban. Or authoritarian countries like Turkey. Brazil is one of the largest democracies in the world. And this has significant coverage. Think about it - if this ban was by the US Supreme Court, would those that oppose, still oppose it? Nfitz (talk) 22:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly! Brazil's Supreme Court < US Supreme Court? ArionStar (talk) 06:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would still oppose if it was a decision by the US Supreme Court. Does not seem particularly significant. Should it really go into the column on top of "More than four hundred people are killed in an Islamist militant attack in Barsalogho Department, Burkina Faso."? Belongs to DYK. C F A 💬 13:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as highly notable event about social media in large market; the WP:POV or WP:CRYSTAL arguments such as this being Musk's own doing or that further blocks in other countries may occur in future are irrelevent in regards to the significance and notability of this case. Happily888 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • OpposeComment When Wikipedia was entirely blocked in Turkey over the content in a single article on the English Wikipedia, the nomination was dismissed due to navel-gazing and lack of significance even though it was a clear instance of censorship. Now we have a block of another very popular website in another large country due to lack of legal compliance. The story additionally entails some non-democratic measures that harshly violate digital freedom, such as fining people who access X and removing VPN apps for download, but the nomination is not about Internet censorship in Brazil. This is sheer navel-gazing on X and Elon Musk.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's a huge difference between an autocracy and one of the world's biggest democracies. That said, if that was a mistake (perhaps link the discussion?), that shouldn't effect this discussion. Nfitz (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That makes sense, but this nomination's goal is not to highlight democratic backsliding in a democratic country, which is probably what posting this blurb would convey as a message to our readers. Internet censorship is a very sensitive topic, so it's very unclear to me whether we should post such blurbs at all. I revoked my oppose votes and transformed it into an ordinary comment because it mostly draws a parallel to a similar instance from the past.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moving to support. This move directly impacts about 20 million people within Brazil alone, likely more depending on how many people you believe are impacted that do not have Twitter accounts, and presumably people outside of Brazil that interact with these accounts. Businesses and nonprofits use it for outreach, advertising, and fundraising. Politicians use it to interact with their constituents. The NFL coming this week is also a big deal here, and most importantly the suddenness of all of it for users is a problem. I think at this point it's really hard to downplay the impacts here. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Use of Twitter is a privilege, not a right. It would be a different story if the court ordered the whole Internet in Brazil to be shuttered, now you have an actual measurable impact. Instead, we have one of many social media platforms blocked, with other alternatives available. Masem (t) 15:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Use of Twitter is a privilege, not a right. and if you bend over backwards even further, everything except food and shelter would also just be a privilege and not a right. This is the judiciary of a democratic country banning access to a major social media platform for 200 million people over a fundamental disagreement about free speech. This is a significant precedent and is massive from a historical perspective. spintheer (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If we are talking free speech rights and govt censorship, then the true issue was back in 2923 when the court ordered social media companies to block accounts that were threatening violence against the court. Though some may argue that given the extremist nature if these accounts and the more restrictive freedoms if spee g in Brazil compared to the US, that this was also a reasonable step. Either way, that is a form of govt censorship, whether it benefits the public good a question beyond this scope. These events now are not censorship, they are putting a company to a penalty for failing to comply with a court order. Whole the impact is that millions of Bra, ilians cannot use Twitter now, theyir voices aren't silenced, they have options like Threads and Bluesky (both reporting massive surges in the wake of this) so that is not a free speech or censorship issue. This is truly just a situation of Musk's own making, given how simple the remedy was (to name a legal Rep for the litigation), and shows him trying to make moves outside normal practice. Which is not really newsworthy, it's only capturing the attention due to how much weight Musk carries in news coverage. — Masem (t) 13:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The MP is not an appropriate place to defend positions. And there are still other social media. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 23:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse posting: Brazil is a country of ~200 million people, 7th highest, about equal to the UK, France, and Italy combined. Xitter, a cursory Web search informs me, is one of the top 25 or so most-visited websites, this side of the Great Firewall. (Different places give varying figures) Anyone want to take the other side of a bet that if UK France and Italy's govts all imposed national blocks of, say, Netflix or microsoft.com, that it wouldn't make its way onto ITN? (Whatever happened to the complaints of ITN being too US/UK-centric?)
Let's play it from the top. Purpose of ITN:
  • To help readers find and quickly access content they are likely to be searching for because an item is in the news.
  • To showcase quality Wikipedia content on current events.
  • To point readers to subjects they might not have been looking for but nonetheless may interest them.
  • To emphasize Wikipedia as a dynamic resource.
    — WP:ITNPURPOSE
--Slowking Man (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, wait for a final judgement instead of contributing to a trial by media. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Trial by media? Excuse me! Judges of the Supreme Federal Court already agreed with the blocking. Media has nothing to do with this. 2804:14D:5C32:4673:67B2:6266:BC34:87D6 (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The block is part of the ongoing investigation due to Musk's non-cooperation. Until the issue is ultimately tried in a court of law and X Corp is found guilty which leads to a permanent block of Twitter, I see no reason to blurb on this as if it's permanent. I feel neither blurbs correctly reflects on this matter. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 13:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Musk found guilty in Brazil? 😂 ArionStar (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose current blurb X being blocked is notable. However, per the concerns of many others, simply stating "X was blocked" does not provide the reader with sufficient context and leaves them with a one-sided, non-NPOV impression that Brazil is cracking down on free speech. The blurb should only be posted if it is also accompanied by the reason for the ban: Elon Musk refusing to ban far right accounts which organized the 2023 Brazilian Congress attack. Support alt blurb 2 only. FlipandFlopped 23:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support either alt blurb. The contention that the injury was self-inflicted does not change the newsworthiness of the result. If Elon Musk committed suicide, would we fail to mention it because someone else did not carry out the killing? BD2412 T 23:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT2 only as original blurb lacks context - let's not imply that this was some dictatorial move, it's because Musk is throwing a tantrum over a court order. That said, one of the world's largest social media apps being blocked in one of the world's largest countries feels notable enough for the front page. The Kip (contribs) 06:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The ALT2 blurb is the best one. ArionStar (talk) 18:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
    Yeah I agree, I don't think it should've been closed at all tbh. If you include weak supports then this nomination actually has more supports (14) than opposes (13). What's weird is that this same admin did something similar just last week. Flyingfishee (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's days old and it wasn't going to get posted. AusLondonder (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The current ITN blurb isn't even on the nomination page anymore (which means it's more than a week old). There was no rush to close this. Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wrong. The blocking occurred on 31 August, after the Paralympics opening ceremony. Please, reopen it. ArionStar (talk) 15:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A 14–13 vote count is a clear no consensus/consensus against posting to me. This is a good closure, as it is doubtful to get posted. Natg 19 (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The request has been open since August 31, and there is clearly no consensus. Correct closure. A.WagnerC(alt) (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So you think a 14–13 vote count is an indication of consensus? C F A 💬 19:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Consensus is not determined by vote tally alone. Even if it was the only factor, 14-13 is hardly an established consensus. The post is six days old and has had numerous arguments in support and opposition. If consensus hasn't developed by now, it's unlikely to. Pats2017 (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This was closed barely a day after the 2nd alt-blurb was added, meaning that the vast majority of editors didn't have didn't have time to consider it. Also the stale stuff comes off weird considering how often posted stuff remains on the main page for far longer than a week. Flyingfishee (talk) 08:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's simply not how consensus works. If people's opposition was based on the wording of the blurb, they had every right to voice that concern during their opposition - or in fact, to recommend an alternative blurb themselves. Anyone !voting to oppose who did not condition their opposition on the current blurb proposed cannot be assumed to be in favor of another blurb. Especially since ITN is known for people conditioning their opinions based on the potential for alternatives. There is a clear consensus that its not notable nor final enough at this time to post. Consensus to post will not magically appear out of nowhere just based on an alternative blurb. For the record, I would've opposed this being an ITN blurb with any wording. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 09:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Posting an alt-blurb doesn't mean the clock restarts on consideration. Also, current posted ITN items may be older, but those items all garnered consensus to post within a few days of their proposal, if not sooner. This item has been here for almost a week now. The lack of consensus to post has been consistent through the life of its candidacy and its multiple alt-blurbs. Pats2017 (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 30

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Sports


    Akarotaxis gouldae

    [edit]
    Article: Akarotaxis (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ A new species of dragonfish, Akarotaxis gouldae, has been discovered in the Southern Ocean (Post)
    News source(s): Cosmos, Earth.com Phys.org
    Credits:

    This recent scientific discovery may be of interest to ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose while I love seeing non-tragic/non-political/non-sports blurbs, this not some groundbreaking discovery that is captivating the world. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Jean-Charles Tacchella

    [edit]
    Article: Jean-Charles Tacchella (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): X - Le Monde
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Nominator's comments: French screenwriter and film director. — Knightoftheswords 19:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose multiple cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Typhoon Shanshan hits Japan

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Article: Typhoon Shanshan (2024) (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Typhoon Shanshan, the strongest of 2024, hits Japan, killing more than six people. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: Typhoon Shanshan, the strongest typhoon of 2024, struck Japan causing over a million evacuations and more than six deaths.
    Alternative blurb II: Typhoon Shanshan leaves at least six people dead in Japan.
    News source(s): CNA, Reuters, Al Jazeera
    Credits:

    The typhoon is the strongest of 2024, over a million told to evacuate; electricity power gone in many places in Japan. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 06:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: One of the strongest in 2024 so far. I feel "the strongest (typhoon) of 2024" should be dropped as none of the sources mention this directly and comes across as puffery. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 08:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support alt: But the strongest storm may change; remember, Cyclone Djoungou was stronger than Typhoon Shanshan. HurricaneEdgar 08:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Re: "strongest" WP:ITNBLURB reads: Blurbs should generally avoid comparison to any previous event, such as "Largest in the region since [year]". Previous events is generally out of scope of the page, and confers a publication bias favoring regions with a low frequency of similar events.Bagumba (talk) 11:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support: Alternative blurb; 2024 still has a few months left O.o -- death toll is likely to rise as well. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait, the impacts could be way more noteworthy in the coming days. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support it's a Typhoon, that's notable enough for inclusion. Scu ba (talk) 17:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A Typhoon is equivalent to a Class 1 hurricane. Not even Class 5 hurricanes are automatically notable. This region alone averages 16 typhoons a year. We 100% are not posting every typhoon. Nfitz (talk) 00:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Six deaths for a natural deaths seems a bit low for it to be blurbworthy. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Tūheitia Paki

    [edit]
    Article: Tūheitia Paki (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): [3][4][5]
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Dhantegge (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article is well-sourced and well-written. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 22:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose not enough information about his death- spinning it off into a death article and leaving only one sentence in the main article is not enough information for ITNQUALITY. Also "Tekau-ma-Rua and Te Kahui Wairua" is improperly sourced- some of the text is sourced to a dead link from 2019, but the 2 tables say "as of 2020 and 2021", and so are outdated and unsourced. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment, I wanted to query whether he was transformative enough to warrant a blurb or not. The Death of Tūheitia Paki article seems to be well under way and I would like to get the ball rolling as to whether it would be optimal or not. Ornithoptera (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yeah, I’ve thought about that as well. Transformative within New Zealand? Certainly. Outside of the country? I have not seen much evidence. He had interacted with world leaders and indigenous leaders, but I don’t think there is enough of it. Schwede66 00:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait Tekau-ma-Rua and Te Kahui Wairua section have four cn tags otherwise article is good to go. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 29

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Sports


    (RD posted) RD/blurb: Johnny Gaudreau

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Proposed image
    Article: Johnny Gaudreau (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination
    Blurb:  American hockey player Johnny Gaudreau (pictured) dies at the age of 31 (Post)
    News source(s): Columbus Dispatch
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
    I'm proposing a blurb considering the young age and his huge popularity worldwide. Would prefer a picture with the CBJ tho --Roncanada (talk) 12:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    One could make the argument that this is a "death is the story" blurb... only 31, killed along with his brother while riding bikes a day before his sister's wedding. Certainly newsworthy. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I spent a long time last night hoping this wouldn’t have to be posted. Life is goddamn cruel, man. Support RD, and honestly support blurb per Pawnkingthree - he was a superstar that died in his prime in an utterly tragic accident. The Kip (contribs) 12:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose currently the article does not meet WP:ITNQUALITY are there is too much unsourced content. If that is fixed, then Support RD only- does not meet threshold for a death blurb in my opinion, as In general, if a person's death is only notable for what they did while alive, it belongs as an RD link. Which looks to be the case here, as the death event is not notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb Tragic for sure, but he was far from being a 'superstar' such as Connor McDavid, Alexander Ovechkin, Sydney Crosby or Evgeni Malkin among other active players. I'd like to see more details on the death as the main story to consider it for posting, but it seems like there's very little information on the accident so it cannot be considered independently notable.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support blurb when article citing issues are resolved and more details about the death are covered (sources exist). Note: COI here, I am a cyclist, and I have lost friends due to drunk drivers. This is a tragedy, and acknowledgement of this incident can only help raise awareness of the dangers of cyclists having to share the road with mass and momentum operated by impaired drivers. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      @Kcmastrpc: We cannot and should not post anything to raise awareness of any cause, however noble the sentiment and cause may be. This would be a slippery slope and lead to all sorts of issues on other topics and we are not here to right great wrongs. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should show nothing more than the facts; anti-drink driving campaigns and cycling safety awareness should be left to others, not here. Abcmaxx (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb Nothing in the article gives the impression as a great figure within hockey, and while a tragic death, not comparable to the type of blurbs where the death is the story. Oppose RD on quality. --Masem (t) 13:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Support RD, quality has been fixed (there's one unsourced sentence in International Play but that should be trivial to fix since its just about being part of a notable team event. --Masem (t) 16:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose on quality. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD quality issues have been fixed. Blurb is a bit much considering he was not the biggest active figure in hockey at any time during his career. Klinetalkcontribs 14:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb, but with the quality issues being fixed, definitely support RD. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 14:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb per Masem, but support RD as sourcing issues appear to have been fixed. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD I don't think there will be consensus for a blurb, but sourcing issues look to be resolved. Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Blurb His manner of death is getting a lot of coverage and he was quite notable in his field. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support RD. This is a well-liked player cut down in his prime by another person's bad choices. This serves as a reminder about the dangers, and frankly stupidity, of drunk driving. Theletterm1973 (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD Quality issues fixed. Weak support blurb Due to manner of death. I remember seeing a lot of users saying that a death blurb makes sense when the subject died suddenly/non-conventional cause of death AND/OR were at the top of their field. Don't think this particular individual was at the top of their field, but his death was sudden and his death is gaining substantial coverage. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fine for RD, oppose blurb. Not in any sense a blurbable figure, regardless of the extremely tragic manner of death. Black Kite (talk) 20:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD for sure, the article looks decent. Oppose blurb. As much sad as it is, he is not notable enough for a blurb. win8x (talking | spying) 20:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Just a friendly reminder for those who are opposing a blurb because he is not "notable enough." The criteria for blurbing a death have nothing to do with the subjects' notability, other than they are a prominent (not major) figure, and the circumstances around their death are gaining widespread international coverage; please see WP:ITNRDBLURB, specifically Death as the main story. If the person's death itself is newsworthy for either the manner of death or the newsworthy reaction to it, it may merit a blurb. I would argue that Johnny Gaudreau is a prominent figure, and the circumstances surrounding his tragic demise rise to blurb worthiness. Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      There is nothing in the article to demonstrate he was a prominent figure. Perhaps one of the top players, but when are talking major figures in a field, we are usually talking about those that can be shown to be the elite of the field (eg for hockey, that would be someone like Wayne Gretzky or Bobby Orr.) Masem (t) 20:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      You mentioned major figures in a field, which is the criteria mentioned for WP:ITNRDBLURB on the third bullet. I'm suggesting that he is a prominent figure in his field whose death is receiving international coverage. What bar would need to be met to be considered "prominent," is it "major" or something else? Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Ideally a dedicated section using reliable sources that clearly explain how he was a major figure in the field. Otherwise, we're hand-waving how significant he was based on editorial opinion, which we should be avoiding. Masem (t) 20:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I agree, generally, we shouldn't be editorializing, but the criteria for ITN death blurb given the circumstances is "prominence", not being a "major" figure. (Am I missing something?). Here's one news source, Johnny Gaudreau was a prominent figure in the NHL. [link] Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC) Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Opposing based off of one criterion is completely fine. In particular, the clause for "death as the main story" says: "If the person's death itself is newsworthy for either the manner of death or the newsworthy reaction to it, it may merit a blurb." People can certinaly support based off of just this criterion, but there is no requirement that opposers need to be in opposition based off of this criterion. Gödel2200 (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Right, but it appears that most of the opposes are citing his (lack of) notability, not the circumstances regarding his death or the reaction. I realize this is ITN and folks can oppose for any reason they chose, I was just trying to reason with editors and perhaps change their minds. Kcmastrpc (talk) 22:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose blurb While he was one of the best players within hockey, he doesn't have nearly the same level of significance or fame as other people posted onto ITN who have died. Still an extremely tragic death, RIP. Hungry403 (talk) 23:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    (Posted) RD: Abu Shujaa

    [edit]
    Article: Abu Shujaa (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CNN
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Nominator's comments: Palestinian militant killed in the West Bank. Gödel2200 (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article is in a okay shape now. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 28

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Science and technology

    Sports


    (Posted) RD: Steve Silberman

    [edit]
    Article: Steve Silberman (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Relix
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Thriley (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article is in a good shape and I think is ready to be posted. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Charlotte Kretschmann

    [edit]
    Article: Charlotte Kretschmann (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    MrJaydenfire (talk) 21:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support meets bare minimum requirement. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 10:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Article is sufficiently well-sourced for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) 2024 Summer Paralympics

    [edit]
    Article: 2024 Summer Paralympics (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: The Summer Paralympics open in Paris, France. (Post)
    News source(s): NBC News
    Credits:

    (Closed) Victoria Siddall

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: Victoria Siddall (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Victoria Siddall becomes the first woman appointed as director of the National Portrait Gallery, London. (Post)
    News source(s): The Guardian
    Credits:
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    August 27

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections


    (Posted) RD: Bob Carr

    [edit]
    Article: Bob Carr (Michigan politician) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Legacy.com
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    240F:7A:6253:1:7969:2ABE:E6E3:A515 (talk) 02:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Juan Izquierdo

    [edit]
    Article: Juan Izquierdo (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CNN, The Guardian
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Nominator's comments: Tragic death, Uruguayan footballer, at the time at Nacional. Article can easily be expanded given the news attention. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support could do with some expansion mainly a photo but otherwise looks alright and may he rest in peace. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 08:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    All fixed now, Thanks Abcmaxx. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is a deletion discussion on the image. The argument presented by the nominator is how likely there is a free photo existing of somebody who played 115 top-flight games in the present era. As per cases I remember like César Luis Menotti, the image should be hidden until the discussion concludes. Nothing says an item needs a photo in order to be posted. Unknown Temptation (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn’t say it needed one it would just help the article and I didn’t add the picture so I cannot comment on its eligibility. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Leonard Riggio

    [edit]
    Article: Leonard Riggio (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Bloomberg, ABC News
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Nominator's comments: Former chairman of Barnes & Noble. 240F:7A:6253:1:6C23:2F26:C0C6:C9D6 (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I added that info to the end of the 1st paragraph in the “Career” section. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Polaris Dawn

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: Polaris Dawn (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ SpaceX's Polaris Dawn mission, set to launch at 07:38 AM UTC on August 27, is delayed for 24 hours after a helium leak. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: ​ SpaceX's Polaris Dawn mission, set to launch early in the morning on August 27, is delayed for 24 hours after a ground-side helium leak.
    News source(s): https://www.space.com/spacex-polaris-dawn-launch-delay-helium-leak, https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/spacex-polaris-launch-postponed-helium-leak-detected-rcna167168, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/08/27/spacex-polaris-dawn-launch-date-time/74962772007/
    Credits:
    Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdraw (as nominator) per others, I will renominate once the space walk is carried out. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 19:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    RD: Nabil Elaraby

    [edit]
    Article: Nabil Elaraby (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Egypt Today
    Credits:
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Nominator's comments: Secretary General of the Arab League. Needs a tid bit of sourcing work — Knightoftheswords 03:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 26

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime


    (Posted) RD: Danelle Barrett

    [edit]
    Article: Danelle Barrett (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): https://usnhistory.navylive.dodlive.mil/Recent/Article-View/Article/3887359/in-memoriam-rear-admiral-danelle-m-barrett-usn-ret/ https://www.wgrz.com/article/life/wny-native-retired-rear-admiral-danelle-barrett-remembered/71-a0c5084d-8288-4415-8792-62e8b998d2f2
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    22:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

    • Weak oppose. Firstly, the line in the lead saying "She was one of fewer than 200 women in history to achieve the U.S. Naval rank of admiral" appears to be cited to charlesmizrahi.com, which I'm not sure is reliable. Secondly, there is no mention of her being promoted to admiral at all in the body. So I think this is slightly incomplete at the moment. Otherwise, a decent enough short article. @Tim1965 and Jkaharper:  — Amakuru (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Amakuru: I added a better source for the line in the lead. I also added referenced info that said that she was promoted to rear admiral (lower half) on July 10, 2015. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support The article has enough details & references. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Posted. Thanks for sorting the issues @Blaylockjam10:.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Sid Eudy

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Article: Sid Eudy (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): BBC, NYT, USA Today, WWE
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American professional wrestler and former WWE/WCW world champion better known as Sid Justice, Sid Vicious, or Sycho Sid. Article needs a lot of work. The Kip (contribs) 20:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Looks good for RD now, support. Natg 19 (talk) 23:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Sven-Göran Eriksson

    [edit]
    Article: Sven-Göran Eriksson (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): BBC Sport
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Former England national football team manager The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 11:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support good article, I didn’t spot any CN tags or unsourced sections so I think it’s good to go. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose article has quite a few cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @PrinceofPunjab: Those have been sorted now. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 25

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Arts and culture

    Disasters and accidents

    Law and crime


    (Posted) RD: Alexander Goehr

    [edit]
    Article: Alexander Goehr (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Telegraph
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    English composer, one of the giants in music history, with a long article that was in bad shape (missing references, copyvio, missing detail, original research). It's still not perfect, but time is running. Collaboration to improve further welcome, details are on the talk page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Don Wert

    [edit]
    Article: Don Wert (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): [7]
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    – Muboshgu (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article appears alright to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Salim Al-Huss

    [edit]
    Article: Salim Al-Huss (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): AP News
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Served 4 terms as Prime Minister of Lebanon. Jaguarnik (talk) 01:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article is in fact ready now. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) Barsalogho massacre

    [edit]
    Article: 2024 Barsalogho battle (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ Dozens of people are killed in an Islamic militant attack in Barsalogho Department, Burkina Faso. (Post)
    News source(s): Al Jazeera
    Credits:
    Comment - According to an (unsourced) statement in the JNIM article infobox, this terrorist group has links to the Taliban Afghani government. That seems like a notable piece of info that should be expanded PrecariousWorlds (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose per Andrew. Had this been an isolated incident, I would've supported it. I also agree with that the war should be added to ongoing conflicts. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support Given notability and death toll. Andrew does bring up an important point about the larger conflict and significant total number of fatalities but I don't see this covered signficantly enough to be updated frequently like the other conflicts we have listed under 'ongoing' in ITN Schwinnspeed (talk) 23:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment: The more I read about this the more I am convinced there will be very little reliable coverage from the region on a frequent enough basis to have meaningful updates under 'ongoing'. Based on the updates to the Jihadist insurgency in Burkina Faso page, it's unlikely to meet the criteria for WP:ONGOING On the other hand, there is an argument to be made that it could bring much needed attention to a lesser known but equally devastating conflict. Whether thats under the purview of WP:ITNPURPOSE is subjective and up for interpretation. Schwinnspeed (talk) 10:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support blurb, but oppose ongoing per Schwinnspeed above. It is distinguishable from the other conflicts we currently have listed. FlipandFlopped 05:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    comment terrorist is a loaded term. just say militant.Sportsnut24 (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    NPOV Agree. The guideline WP:TERRORIST says

    ... best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject ...

    Curently the WP page doesn't have "terrorist" or the like in it. —Bagumba (talk) 04:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support - Referenced and ready.BabbaQ (talk) 20:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Posted Bit of a slim article, but there is consensus here that it can be posted. The number of people killed should be discussed in more detail, or more sources cited, as our blurb says "dozens", the article infobox says "200+", and the prose says "at least 400 or 500 people". Some more alignment would be good. I've changed the blurb and replaced "terrorist" with "militant" as per the late comments. Schwede66 23:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Schwede66: It might be good for the blurb to say that the attack was carried out Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's always good to comment on blurbs and propose additional ones before something gets posted, Blaylockjam10. It should get support from other editors before we make those amendments / changes. Schwede66 00:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Post-posting support The attack’s important enough for a blurb & the article’s good enough to post. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Joe D'Alessandris

    [edit]
    Article: Joe D'Alessandris (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CBS Sports
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Former coach for the Baltimore Ravens. 240F:7A:6253:1:E977:822B:E475:C770 (talk) 22:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose article is basically a stub. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 06:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Arrest of Pavel Durov

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: Pavel Durov#2024_Arrest (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ The founder of the messenger app Telegram and the social network VK, Pavel Durov was arrested for complicity in several illegal charges (Post)
    Alternative blurb: Pavel Durov, founder of the messenger app Telegram and the social network VK, is arrested for complicity in several illegal charges.
    Alternative blurb II: Pavel Durov, founder of the messenger app Telegram and the social network VK, is arrested on charges of complicity in several crimes.
    News source(s): CNN
    Credits:
    Bakhos2010 (talk) 17:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose that we don't post simple arrests, we use for the conviction. Further oppose that there's no reason for this to be a separate article from Durov's until there's actually a full trial and conviction to discuss. --Masem (t) 17:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support This is rather mysterious but seems (geo)political rather than being an ordinary crime -- comparable with the persecution of people like Julian Assange. It seems to be making making headlines in all the major international media and so is quite newsworthy. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • It is certainly in the news to be notable. That sinking in sicily last week was too. very suspicious.Sportsnut24 (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose - We don't generally post arrests, and he's neither such a major public figure, nor accused of so huge a crime, as to provide a good reason to vary that. With all due respect to Scu Ba above, Durov really isn't in Musk or Zuckerberg's ballpark. GenevieveDEon (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      It may be of surprise that the MAU for Telegram is significantly more than X. Kcmastrpc (talk) 23:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      It is not 'of surprise'. I already knew this, and I am a Telegram user myself. But Zuckerberg and Musk are massively influential multi-billionaires with other businesses to their names. If Zuckerberg had been arrested, no-one would be saying he was 'similar to Musk or Durov'. Durov wouldn't be getting mentioned at all. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Durov was once referred to as the “Mark Zuckerburg” of Russia due to his role in VK. I digress though, he’s one of the worlds most influential businessmen, however, he maintains a low profile.
      He’s essentially accused of not suppressing “misinformation” at the behest of the EU. His arrest should scare the hell out of anyone who cares about free speech. Kcmastrpc (talk) 23:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      This is not the place to right great wrongs. I'm not saying that this isn't an interesting or concerning development; I'm saying that using sensationalism and peacock terms to describe it is counterproductive in making the argument that it should be on ITN. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose - perhaps if this is geopolitical, but I don't see a reason for France to be doing that, or even much speculation. No prejudice if the reason he was arrested is more significant than it appears to be.
    Nfitz (talk) 21:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support We don’t post allegations per WP:BLP and wait for the conviction, but I don’t see what prevents us from posting an arrest of a major figure if it receives media attention and is well-documented in a separate article.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      There shouldn't be a separate article for the arrest because that itself can be taken as a BLP violation. Nothing dramatic happened with the arrest (eg not a massive manhunt to secure him), and when you take away the reaction section on that article, it all can be covered on the bio page. Not every single event needs its own page. Masem (t) 23:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I strongly suspect AfD would be a speedy keep, but this really isn’t the place to make such an argument. Kcmastrpc (talk) 23:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      We can find out, because I have nominated it for deletion/merger. Please note that this is separate from the question of whether the arrest should be at ITN or not - there's a lot of nonsense out there about things which are nominated for ITN needing separate articles (eg deaths, arrests, etc) which isn't true. If the arrest article is deleted, that shouldn't in itself be an obstacle to the story being posted. (And it's my understanding that the article being at AfD suspends this discussion, so it might be best if the ITN nomination targeted the main Pavel Durov article for now.) GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yea, I was attempting to update the links because I don’t believe this discussion should be procedurally closed while the main article covering the arrest is being discussed at AfD. Kcmastrpc (talk) 23:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Thank you. I want to be clear that I think the story of Durov's arrest is important and interesting, just that it's not necessarily material for a separate article or an ITN posting. It's definitely a significant development. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      This is notable even if there's no separate article. Given the amount of content in that article, this would be an extensive update of the event in the article about him, which speaks to notability of the event.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Casting aspersions, and discussion about readership and views.
    Le Monde headlines this as Telegram CEO Pavel Durov arrested in France in world-first case. France24 has it as Russia slams France after arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov. The NYT says Telegram Becomes Free Speech Flashpoint After Founder’s Arrest. So this is both prominent in major French newspapers and explicitly a freedom of speech issue. Khuft's comments are therefore counterfactual. Are they cooperating with the French authorities or what? Andrew🐉(talk) 10:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, are you really accusing Khuft of being a French government proxy? GenevieveDEon (talk) 10:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have no idea who Khuft is and their user page isn't giving much away. I'm just puzzled that their comments are at variance with the evidence that I presented. What's the explanation for this? Andrew🐉(talk) 10:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact that someone disagrees with you doesn't entitle to cast WP:ASPERSIONS about them secretly working for the French authorities. That's plainly absurd. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I rather doubt that they are working for the French authorities, secretly or otherwise. The point is to ask why they are saying things which seem to be quite wrong and not supported by the evidence. When I google "Le Monde headlines" the top hit is this very story in Le Monde. It's not just prominent, it's the lead story. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure why there's any need to hyperventilate. The Le Monde link you shared actually validates my point: Le Monde is featuring this story under their "Pixels" segment, where they put news about digital things. If you actually go to Le Monde's French website, you have to scroll down somewhat to find it. If you had read my comment, you'd noticed I mentioned that it's not featured prominently, ie. as one of the top news items. This may change, of course, if he gets charged, which is why my vote was for Wait. Concerning the Freedom of Speech issue: it's well-known that Continental Europe and the US have different conceptions of free speech versus hate speech, so there's no need to elaborate on that. Finally. it's not because a person is able to read French that they are automatically an agent of the French state (or even a French citizen). Khuft (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The presentation by Le Monde seems to depend on whether it's the French language version or their English language version (they have a toggle at the top -- FRANÇAIS / ENGLISH). It's currently on the front page in both cases. On the French page, it's about halfway down as Arrestation de Pavel Durov : la défense de l’Etat de droit plus qu’une « attaque contre la liberté d’expression ». On the English page, it's at the top as Pavel Durov's arrest is a defense of the rule of law rather than an attack on freedom of expression.
    Maybe Le Monde tailors the order of stories to the readership in the different languages but, either way, it's front page news and freedom of speech is a headline aspect.
    Andrew🐉(talk) 12:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As further evidence, note that Le Monde has a "Most read" section and currently that's:
    1. Panic mounts on pro-war Russian Telegram channels after Pavel Durov's arrest
    2. Telegram CEO Pavel Durov arrested in France in world-first case
    3. Paris police wary of new threat posed by Nigerian gangs
    4. France extends detention of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov
    5. Paris celebrates 80th anniversary of liberation during World War II
    6. Solingen knife attack puts Germany's ruling coalition in difficulty
    7. Pavel Durov, Russia's libertarian 'Robin Hood' of the internet
    8. After police operations 'destabilize' drug dealers in France, a deadly summer
    9. Hezbollah's attack on Israel marks 'first phase' that does not upset balance of war
    So, four out of nine top stories are about Pavel Durov and he has the top two slots.
    Andrew🐉(talk) 13:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Did you check the French language version of the "most read" section? Because that one currently features: 1) article on Hezbollah; 2) & 3) articles on nominating new French PM; 4) Ukraine; 5) French novelist; 6) Pavel Durov; 7), 8) and 9) more French politics. Not sure what the English language version of a French newspaper is supposed to say about the prominence of a news item in France, to be honest. Khuft (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This is an international story not an exclusively French one. And this is the English language Wikipedia, not the French one. If international readers like reading about this story in English then this is the right place to cover it. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You spent the last few posts trying to argue it's a prominent news in France (it's mid at most) and accusing me of being a French agent. Don't complain or change the subject when your own evidence /metrics disprove you. Khuft (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's a clear example of cherry-picking your sources: you're choosing Le Monde's less-used language option because it gives you the answer you want. But in any case - the popularity of the articles is not a guide to significance of the story. As I've said before - Taylor Swift's Eras Tour has been a massive story over the past several months, but no-one has even nominated it here. And that's because readership alone is not an indicator of significance. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose posting the arrest (I am mostly opposed to posting arrests in general). Posting the charges is another question, though in this case, I think it makes more sense to wait for the trial, and see if he gets convicted. Gödel2200 (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose I don't really see this story in the (mainstream) news at all and this sections supposed to be a representation of topics currently in the worldwide news, is it not?
    • Also on a separate topic, has a story about (alleged) criminals getting arrested ever been posted here? Kasperquickly (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      There have been several cases. Examples include: Arrest of Pervez Musharraf, ICC arrest warrant for Putin and Corruption in EU parliament. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Putin was a bit of an IAR exception based on his being a head of state of one of the world's great powers being charged with war crimes. This is a run of the mill criminal case in a developed country with a solid reputation for the rule of law. The other examples were dicey IMO. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Putin was not the first such case – see ICC arrest warrant for Gaddafi while Omar al-Bashir was posted at ITN in 2008, 2009 and 2010 but is still awaiting trial by the ICC. See the Mills of God... Andrew🐉(talk) 19:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose. Lot of sensationalism here. Durov isn't some massive household name, and even if he was, his arrest is only a blip. I could see an actual conviction being notable here, but otherwise, this isn't that big of news. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose per Masem. I feel arrest blurbs in general contributes to a trial by media. I also agree with GenevieveDEon and DarkSide830 regarding notability; Your average human is far more likely to have heard of a major world leader, Facebook/Twitter or Zuckerberg/Musk than Telegram/VK and Durov. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose per above, we don't post simple arrests. Editor 5426387 (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong Oppose We do not post arrests. Also linking an unproven set of serious criminal charges on the main page raises serious BLP concerns in my mind. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yes, we do post arrests. I've posted five examples above and am still going through the archives. Here are another 10. They are in no particular order as that's how the search delivers them.
      1. In the midst of announced reforms by Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, over 40 senior Saudi princes and ministers are arrested on corruption charges.
      2. Hezbollah rejects arrest warrants issued by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon against its senior members.
      3. Guinean President Alpha Condé is arrested by military officials during a coup d'état.
      4. In Russia, protests against the arrest of Alexey Navalny occur in many cities.
      5. Suffolk police launch an investigation on five dead bodies discovered near Ipswich in Suffolk, United Kingdom. A 37-year-old supermarket worker is arrested in nearby Trimley St. Martin on suspicion of murder.
      6. The Chinese government announces that artist and dissident Ai Weiwei has been arrested.
      7. Two separate criminal probes result in the arrest of seven FIFA officials and the raid of its headquarters by Swiss police.
      8. Three individuals are arrested for involvement with a security breach at Twitter that resulted in many prominent accounts promoting a bitcoin scam.
      9. Wichita, Kansas police announce the arrest of Dennis Rader, who they suspect to be the BTK killer.
      10. In Germany, 25 members of a far-right group are arrested in connection with a coup d'état plot.
      Andrew🐉(talk) 20:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support A notable case of a government action against one of the most popular messengers in the world, has sparked a huge debate about free expression and compliance with authorities, possibly a field-changing event. The article looks fine. Trepang2 (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose The French government have said that the arrest is nothing to do with them and is purely a police matter, appearing to be part of a larger investigation. Given that, the arrest of someone who isn't a major public figure I don't believe rises to the level of ITN - yet. Black Kite (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose Per Masem and many others above, wait for the conviction. Schwinnspeed (talk) 23:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    August 24

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime


    (Posted) RD: Siegfried Lorenz (baritone)

    [edit]
    Article: Siegfried Lorenz (baritone) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): operalounge.de
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Leading baritone at the opera houses of East Berlin, appearing internationally. Another of my DYK articles. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    His birthday is 30 August. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How do we know, though? The birthdate is unreferenced. Schwede66 01:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks to Nikkimaria who created the article for referencing it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kingdom of Jesus Christ compound standoff

    [edit]
    Article: Kingdom of Jesus Christ compound standoff (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ In the Philippines, after multiple accusations of sexual abuse, the Kingdom of Jesus Christ has a standoff in their compound, causing protests and injuries. (Post)
    News source(s): 1, 2, 3.
    Credits:

    Significant event, gaining multiple reactions from the Senate, the Kingdom of Jesus Christ has gone through a lot of controversy, so maybe it has a chance to appear in the main page?

    strong oppose totally local (as per sources too). of no consequence. maybe try DYK. Sportsnut24 (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Maybe try DYK" isn't good advice, as articles can only be nominated to DYK by the creator/main contributor (for recently created articles) or 5x expander. It's not just a wastebasket for articles that don't fit ITN. Also, the DYK queuing system means it will get published in several weeks at least, if it is even eligible.
    Regarding the "local" and "no consequence" claims, it does have important consequences as the leader of the church, Apollo Quiboloy, is a close ally of the Duterte family, causing a major rift in the national government. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong support. Unlike what was mentioned before, it isn't of no consequence, as the move brings into open conflict the Bongbong Marcos administration and the Duterte family (notably Vice President Sara Duterte and former president Rodrigo Duterte) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose The standoff is still ongoing, but so far the political effects of it seem to be speculative in nature. Quiboloy has still not been arrested, and claims that the arrest was attempted in order to undermine Duerte are still only claims. Gödel2200 (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    For people looking to oppose this, let me consider things which makes this standoff notable to me:
    • KOJC is an international group, housing 6 million members.
    • 1 person died as part of the KOJC in result of this incident.
    • 2,000 police officers were deployed to handle this situation.
    • As Chaotic Enby said, the standoff caused national controversy.
    • Four police officers were hospitalized.
    • I think a protest is notable by itself.
    Again, you can vote whatever you think is suitable. But I just want to tackle my opinion on this topic. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Stephen E. Thorpe

    [edit]
    Article: Stephen E. Thorpe (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): NZ Herald
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    English-born New Zealand entomologist. 240F:7A:6253:1:BC57:383D:4D26:A245 (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not ready article needs a bit more expansion. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • With less than 300 words of prose, this wikibio is a bit stubby. Anything more to write about him? The intro has only a single sentence. Main prose has no mention of or references on his date and place of birth. --PFHLai (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support It looks like this article has enough details & references now. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Christoph Daum

    [edit]
    Article: Christoph Daum (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Der Spiegel, Associated Press
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Noted German football coach. 240F:7A:6253:1:7157:6A0D:C1D6:975F (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support Article looks ready. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Honours section is unsourced. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Betty Halbreich

    [edit]
    Article: Betty Halbreich (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): WWD
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Article updated and well sourced. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support looks alright to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support a passing admin should RD this. FlipandFlopped 05:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    PostedBagumba (talk) 05:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Tom Brown Jr.

    [edit]
    Article: Tom Brown Jr. (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): NY Times
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American survivalist. Obituary published 24 August. Thriley (talk) 22:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not ready article needs a bit of restructuring and there are two cn tags but hey! Publications and media section is fully sourced. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support @Admins willing to post ITN: It looks like this article has enough details & references. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 22:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 23

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections


    (Posted) Solingen stabbing

    [edit]
    Article: 2024 Solingen stabbing (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ A mass stabbing linked to Islamic terrorism at a festival in Solingen, Germany leaves at least three people dead and multiple people with severe injuries. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: ​ In Germany, three people are killed in a mass stabbing claimed by Islamic State at a festival in Solingen.
    News source(s): Reuters, WP
    Credits:

    Thriley (talk) 00:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wait Similar to the Bondi stabbing so we will most likely post in due time when more info comes out 27.96.223.192 (talk) 01:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait per above. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 04:38, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait for more information as per above. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 09:18, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Mass casualty event that is being covered significantly across global media outlets. Article appears to meet the criteria for ITN and will only continue to develop. Kcmastrpc (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose. There's no wait, something needs to demonstrate notability before anything else. There's been no wide societal effect (like there was with the recent Southport stabbing), and none of the people involved are notable. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    They have not ruled out being a terrorist attack and are investigating as if it was one. I agree if this turns out to be a simple domestic matter that it doesn't make sense to post, but if this was terrorism, that's a different matter. — Masem (t) 00:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Same thing with Bondi, we posted that didn’t we? 27.96.223.192 (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's notable due to how rare deadly knife attacks are in Germany. Furthermore it seems to be an Islamist attack claimed by IS which has had notable political ramifications. IsTheLightThatBright (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support for the following reasons: three people killed in a country where such killings are not notable, you have a notable Islamist group claiming responsibility, and involves an issue that is highly political in numerous nations and is also connected to a wider geopolitical controversy. It's currently on the frontpage of BBC, ABC News Australia, Bloomberg, HuffPost, NBC News, CNN, CBC News, AlJazeera, and WION.
    IsTheLightThatBright (talk) 12:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "where such killings are not notable" should be "where such killings are not common". IsTheLightThatBright (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    you can update your original post, and delete the follow up (and you have my permission to delete this message if you wish). Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yep, I agree. It would be a different story if for example a shooting killed a few people in America we wouldn’t post but the same happening in Iceland for example would get posted. It’s about notability not death count. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Why don't you declare your support then? IsTheLightThatBright (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support No reason this shouldn’t be on ITN, significant attack. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 13:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    (1) Suspecting that this was terrorism is very different from confirming that this was terrorism.
    (2) I am not saying that these types of attacks are common, but at least three in one year certainly does not seem rare to me. Gödel2200 (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    1) It won't be confirmed that it was terrorism until the investigation is completed which will take days if not weeks, and it may even be non-confirmed if the police go down a politically-neutral route like mental heath (as they do in the UK). The likelihood that it was terrorism is high nevertheless.
    2) It does not need to be rare, just uncommon enough that it can go on ITN. IsTheLightThatBright (talk) 15:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How many attacks with more casualties does daesh claim responsibility for in syria or iraq? knife attacks in eurpe are like shooting inthe usa now.Sportsnut24 (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How is that? It is a not even claimed by anything of import. a lone wolf "muslim" doesnt make it "islamic".Sportsnut24 (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    oppose as usual as shootings in the usa now. don't post those for 3 deaths.Sportsnut24 (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Russell Malone

    [edit]
    Article: Russell Malone (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): [9]
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Noted jazz guitarist. Needs more citations to be ready. Flibirigit (talk) 00:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose unsourced discography and couple of cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 04:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Peter Lundgren

    [edit]
    Article: Peter Lundgren (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Tennis World USA, ATP Tour
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Swedish tennis player and coach of Roger Federer. His death was announced on this day. 240F:7A:6253:1:6C5A:3B46:FCA7:E9D5 (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support The article looks good and the person is definitely notable enough to post. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support article meets the bare minimum requirement. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 04:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Summer Koshien

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: Summer Koshien (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Kyoto International wins the 106th Summer Koshien. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: Kyoto International wins the 106th Summer Koshien for the first time ever.
    News source(s): NHK Kyodo KBS World AP-Yonhap
    Credits:
    i am not used to it so i accept suggestions for the blurb, The number is used beacuse is mostly commonly used instead of the year, akin to Olympics or Super Bowl. Meganinja202 (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    August 22

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Arts and culture

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections


    (Attention needed) RD: Arthur J. Gregg

    [edit]
    Article: Arthur J. Gregg (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): ArmyTimes
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    U.S. Army General and namesake of Fort Gregg-Adams. 240F:7A:6253:1:6132:7E42:1CB9:9DC9 (talk) 15:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Admins willing to post ITN: I think this is good enough to post, so it’d be good if someone looked at it & made a decision. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Sphen

    [edit]
    Article: Sphen and Magic (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CBS News
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Notable pair of penguins, article seems to be in good shape. 193.165.236.224 (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Support the article has been significantly updated and there is specific coverage of the death of Sphen. As such, I believe this meets the threshold of ITN. Note: a separate article is not required for ITNRD, as per Individuals who do not have their own article but who have significant coverage on an article about a group (e.g. one member of a musical group) are eligible for a recent deaths entry on a case-by-case basis., which I believe is met here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. Natg 19 (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Canada railroad shutdown

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: 2024 Canada railroad shutdown (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ Canadian rail freight traffic shuts down after the Canadian National Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Kansas City fail to reach an agreement with the Teamsters union. (Post)
    News source(s): The Wall Street Journal
    Credits:
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    (Posted) RD: Mike Lynch

    [edit]
    Article: Mike Lynch (businessman) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CNBC
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Bayesian (yacht) sinking victim that was missing has been found. –  Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support Article looks detailed and well sourced. Flyingfishee (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support With the blurb nom closed, we should promptly RD this. FlipandFlopped 15:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 21

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections


    (Posted) RD: David Anfam

    [edit]
    Article: David Anfam (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): ARTnews
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    English art historian, curator and author. 240F:7A:6253:1:7157:6A0D:C1D6:975F (talk) 11:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Weak Support while article is fully sourced and meets bare minimum requirement, I would still suggest a bit more expansion. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose WP:STUB at 1240 B (209 words).—Bagumba (talk) 04:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support It’s been expanded & has enough details & references now. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Roger Cook

    [edit]
    Article: Roger Cook (landscaper) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): This Old House's website
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American landscaper and star of This Old House. 240F:7A:6253:1:5D40:44D2:9C5E:9E6 (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Weak Oppose the article needs a bit more expansion and there are couple of issues with some of the cited sources such as a Facebook source. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Nick Mileti

    [edit]
    Article: Nick Mileti (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CBS Sports
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Founder of Cleveland Cavaliers. 240F:7A:6253:1:5D40:44D2:9C5E:9E6 (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose couple of paragraphs ending without a footnote and Publications sections sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Al Attles

    [edit]
    Article: Al Attles (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): ESPN
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Former NBA player and coach. In good shape. Natg 19 (talk) 00:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article appears alright to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 09:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Sufficient quality.—Bagumba (talk) 10:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Bill Pascrell

    [edit]
    Article: Bill Pascrell (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): [10]
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Member of the US House – Muboshgu (talk) 16:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wait there are couple of paragraphs ending without a footnote and Caucus memberships section needs more sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support article is ready now. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 09:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Nell McCafferty

    [edit]
    Article: Nell McCafferty (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): The Irish Times
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Irish journalist and feminist campainger. 240F:7A:6253:1:6C49:608C:B2F6:5005 (talk) 13:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose early life section is unsourced and so are some of the other paragraphs. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've updated some of the references to be up to date now @PrinceofPunjab Duck Dur (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Duck Dur early life section still needs a bit more sources and Bibliography section is missing ISBN codes. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 09:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I will update them later today Duck Dur (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) 2024 Yemen floods

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: 2024 Yemen floods (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Floods in western Yemen results in the deaths of at least 61 people and the displacement of 6,042 families (Post)
    News source(s): Anadolu Agency
    Credits:
    Abo Yemen 12:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Upon further thinking, I change my vote to Oppose now too due to insufficient updates. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 09:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support on notability. BilboBeggins (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    August 20

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Science and technology

    • BMW recalls more than 720,000 vehicles due to an electrical issue with the vehicle's water pump that could potentially cause a vehicle fire. (AP)

    (Posted) RD: Maryvonne Le Dizès

    [edit]
    Article: Maryvonne Le Dizès (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): The Strad
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Violinist of the Ensemble intercontemporain for more than 20 years, collaborating with founder Pierre Boulez and other composers, commissioning new works, teaching for decades - and had no article until her death became known on 20 August (only one in Russian which we didn't consult). There could be more detail about recordings but I'm out for the day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article looks good enough to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support 750h+ 11:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Well-sourced. Have added some recordings. Date of death as yet unclear. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support This has enough details & references. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 22:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Atsuko Tanaka

    [edit]
    Article: Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Official Statement by Hikaru Tanaka on Twitter
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Japanese voice actress. Tofusaurus (talk) 13:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose surprised at the almost fully sourced filmography tables, but article needs a bit more prose. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Sam Landsberger

    [edit]
    Article: Sam Landsberger (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): [11], [12]
    Credits:

    Article needs updating
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

     Happily888 (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose article is a stub. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Maria Branyas

    [edit]
    Article: Maria Branyas (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): CBS News, El País
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American-born Spanish supercentenarian. 240F:7A:6253:1:900E:954A:2704:19B9 (talk) 11:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 19

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Arts and culture

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Science and technology


    2024 Kiribati parliamentary election

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Article: 2024 Kiribati parliamentary election (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Taneti Maamau's (pictured) Tobwaan Kiribati Party wins the most seats in the 2024 Kiribati parliamentary election but not enough to form a government outright (Post)
    News source(s): [13][14][15]
    Credits:

    Article needs updating
    The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

    It may be a minor country, but it was still a national election. Article could use an update to the infobox, as well as an aftermath section. Scu ba (talk) 02:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Superyacht sinks

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: Bayesian (yacht) (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ The superyacht Bayesian is sunk in a storm and the missing passengers include tycoon Mike Lynch (Post)
    News source(s): BBC
    Credits:

    Article updated
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    (Ready) RD: Phil Donahue

    [edit]
    Article: Phil Donahue (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): ABC News (USA)
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American talk show personality. Staraction (talk | contribs) 14:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose a couple of cn tags, The Phil Donahue Show section does not have a source. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 15:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose due to citation needed tags. Suonii180 (talk) 17:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support, Donahue reinvented the talk show format and brought the concept up a level or two. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Every person with an article is deemed notable enough for RD. So the only issue to be discussed here relates to the quality/sourcing of the article (see WP:ITNRD). Tradediatalk 16:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support CN tags seem to be resolved Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As of now, I can see 4 "citation needed". Tradediatalk 22:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 18

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Sports


    RD: Ruth Johnson Colvin

    [edit]
    Article: Ruth Johnson Colvin (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Associated Press, BBC
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American philanthropist and founder of ProLiteracy. 240F:7A:6253:1:F408:FA10:89EF:D1C4 (talk) 21:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose ProLiteracy section is unsourced and the published works section needs more references. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) 2024 Tour de France Femmes

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Article: 2024 Tour de France Femmes (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ In cycling, Katarzyna Niewiadoma wins the Tour de France Femmes. (Post)
    News source(s): Guardian BBC Le Monde
    Credits:
    Article updated

    RD: Franciszek Smuda

    [edit]
    Article: Franciszek Smuda (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): SF-WP (in Polish)
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Nominator's comments: Big name in Polish football, internationally best known as the Poland national manager when hosting Euro 2012. Abcmaxx (talk) 12:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose mutiple cn tags and Honours section needs more sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD/blurb: Alain Delon

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Article: Alain Delon (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination
    Blurb:  French actor Alain Delon (pictured) dies at the age of 88 (Post)
    News source(s): BBC
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    I'm personally inclined for a blurb here. Name a French actor and he would be there. Brandmeistertalk 07:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Those are not the criteria, and never have been. You are actively misleading other users by continuing to claim that they are. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support blurb, legendary actor with storied career and varied international work, recipient of major awards like His name was long associated with standard, he defined what was a handsome male. BilboBeggins (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support blurb: Despite being way too young to remember him properly, I should note he's one of the few actors we consider as vital, next to the likes of Sydney Poitier and Betty White (who did received the "blurb treatment", as well). Plus, he's been widely regarded as one of the main cinema icons of the last century, so the notability is definitely there. It's true, though, that the article still needs a bit of work before we can proceed, and I don't know if I'll be able to help myself... Oltrepier (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support blurb: I wouldn't normally support a blurb for an actor but the Sydney Poitier and Betty White precedents argue in its favour. He was arguably among the three best known french actors abroad along with Catherine Deneuve and Gérard Depardieu and had a major following in Japan. The original sin was in accepting blurbs for actors in the first place Varoon2542 (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would rather educate myself about dead legendary artists, than read about the latest PDC World Darts Championship. Tradediatalk 16:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I won't be disagreeing with that Varoon2542 (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose blurb - Per above PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you please elaborate on that? I would very much like to hear you rationale for oppose because I really didn't see any rule-based rationales from other oppose voters, its mostly about opinions. BilboBeggins (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's how RD blurbs work, it's generally based on opinion. WP:ITNRDBLURB and all. Kcmastrpc (talk) 22:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The deaths of sufficiently notable people are notable, and that's why we have both RD and (occasionally) death blurbs. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD, neutral on blurb there really needs to be more clear-cut/explicit criteria for what is appropriate to be blurbed, which is why I am staying neutral on the blurb. As far as I've seen, nobody has a good argument for why Willie Mays or Tony Bennett or Betty White's deaths were appropriate to be blurbed but Delon's death isn't, when the circumstances are more or less the same (old celebrity dies of poor health). Article quality is fine, except for the family section - one more statement needs to be cited, and the quality of the other sources is poor. For instance, geneanet is user-aggregated and thus shouldn't be used as a source of info. (To be honest I would just remove the family section entirely.) When those issues are fixed, it will be good to post as RD. Jaguarnik (talk) 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      My argument is as it has always been that none of your examples deserved a blurb - if we're blurbing the death, the death (NOT the person) has to be notable as an event in itself - hence the serving political leader criterion This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 23:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      This is not what rules say. There has been nothing notable about deaths of Tony Bennet, Queen Elisabeth, Pele or Pope Benedict XVI. They were all blurbed though. BilboBeggins (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      There needs to be a request for comment about this topic, because at this point it doesn't seem that there's a rationale for blurbing someone's death other than "We blurbed x so why not y". A consensus would be good. Jaguarnik (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • More than 15 paragraphs that lack a single reference, and lots of other unreferenced material. Stephen 22:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not Ready for RD for the usual reason. Neutral on a blurb if we can get the article up to scratch. He was one of the top actors in France, but the community has turned down giants in the field. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Bibliography comment Alain Delon § Bibliography is not the usual list of works by the subject. It's an extensive listing about the subject. Disucssion at Talk:Alain Delon § Bibliography. Missing ISBNs too.—Bagumba (talk) 04:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment WILL EVERYONE STOP ATTACKING EACH OTHER PLEASE!! Thank you, anyways here’s a solution for now: put him in the RD we debate a little more for blurb. relax and stop attacking each other agressively Ion.want.uu (talk) 14:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support blurb Very influential actor, I have not heard about him before but he seems to be a very important figure in films. Still some problems needing to be fixed but once they’re fixed I reckon we blurb him. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 06:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Lean oppose blurb Articles and discussions like this sometimes make me feel like I just intersected with a parallel universe or another planet. How could I, considering myself to be a reasonably well-informed individual, have missed being aware of someone who is apparently so prominent? It's nice to have Wikipedia to remind me that there is a world outside of my own country (the United States), and sometimes a global culture is not so global. We may be entirely ignorant of many of each others' celebrities, for example. Although my experience may not be representative of that of others, with one or two exceptions, I was not aware of Delon nor his films.

    I believe global notability, at least within the English-speaking world, ought to be a prerequisite for inclusion as a blurb in the English language Wikipedia. Since that threshold is arbitrary, however, this forum provides a good test for determining global notability. I have no issue with entertainers being included if they are determined to have sufficient notability. As one test, one could compare him with others born in the same year. Among Delon's peers who were born in 1935, I believe Elvis Presley, Luciano Pavorotti, Julie Andrews and Woody Allen are some of the most notable entertainers who would reach that threshold. Despite some impressive achievements in French cinema, I don't believe Alain Delon passes the threshold of global notability in the English-speaking world for inclusion as a blurb.Ryan Reeder (talk) 07:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    No. This is Wikipedia in English, not Wikipedia about people who speak English. There is not, and never should be, any requirement that our subjects be especially famous in the English-speaking world rather than any other language sphere. Your own admitted ignorance of French cinema is a sign that you are being parochial, not that Alain Delon was not famous. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This is why notability is pretty relative and depends on cultural context, and why one person's judgement isn't enough to establish global notability. As a French person myself, I see Alain Delon as a defining figure of French cinema and assumed he would be much more well-known internationally than he might actually be. On the other hand, I haven't heard as much about the achievements of Pavorotti or Andrews, and would have underestimated their notability compared to Delon's. This kind of notability depends a lot on the cultural sphere one lives in, which means hearing from editors with various perspectives is great to see whether someone is truly globally notable.
    Like Genevieve said, I don't think notability within the English-speaking world should be a prerequisite rather than global notability, but either way, it seems like Delon might just not be reaching that threshold. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    First, he passes threshold of global notability.
    Second, we don't require English a person to be famous in English speaking world in order to qualify for a blurb, this not in the rules.
    Third, Delon has 120 Wikipedia articles in different languages, Pavarotti has 95 articles, Julie Andrews has 84 articles, Woody Allen has 109 articles. He surpasses them on the metric of number of articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎BilboBeggins (talkcontribs) 12:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose on quality for now. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose Blurb democracy manifest guy had considerably more press vs this dude, and he didn't even get a RD mention. Also, orange tagged, so oppose RD until the typical prominent actor dies citing concerns are fixed. Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Apples and oranges. Some ordinary dude who came under spotlight after being arrested by Australian police vs an actor with a 70-year film career, culminated in multiple domestic and foreign awards. C'mon... Brandmeistertalk 16:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Democracy manifest guy was more recent hence more press. If Delon was in his peak today he would have plenty of press coverage. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose on quality, several parts of the article have sourcing issues. Suonii180 (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose on quality grounds, currently still has a big tag on the top. No comment in relation to blurb or RD but leaning against blurbing if it gets sorted. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb if every celebrity with an "influence" and "recognition by peers" section in their article is inherently notable enough to merit a blurb, then we should be auto-blurbing basically every major dead actor or singer. Instead, we gauge notability by coverage in the press and while there is some coverage, it does not rise beyond the standard level of obituary coverage expected of a celebrity. FlipandFlopped 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Isn't it what exactly took place with Sydney Poitier and Betty White ?
      How is Betty White notable ? Noone actually knows her outside of the US
      For years, notability has been determined on one criteria, "who Wikipedia editors know" and that usually depends on geography and age
      I'm sure older Americans have heard of him
      We are pretending to be impartial when we've never been
      If Alain Delon, doesn't even get an RD by now, no french actor will ever be seen as deserving one Varoon2542 (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Sydney Poitier was hugely influential figure not just for his skill as an actor but for his role in breaking color barriers in the film industry. Betty White was buoyed by a wave of fan supports. Honestly, she should not have been posted. It's worth noting that very famous actors are routinely rejected including Kirk Douglas and Olivia de Havilland, two giants from the golden age of Hollywood. The only issue keeping Delon from RD is the article's gnerally poor referencing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Worldwide, Poitier is not more influential than Delon. BilboBeggins (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Stats As we have the usual impasse at ITN, it is instructive to see what our readers are choosing. We find that:
    1. Alain Delon was the top read article on Wikipedia yesterday with about double the readership of the closest competition – Alien: Romulus
    2. Most of the ITN blurb articles do not have significant readership -- they are at the 10K level which is effectively the baseline for ITN. The only exception is Paetongtarn Shinawatra who got about 80K but that's still an order of magnitude less than Delon.
    So, it's apparent that ITN is quite out of touch with the general readership. Our readers really don't care what stale stuff we run and just vote with their feet.
    Andrew🐉(talk) 22:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yet again, it must be stated that ITN does not consider readership numbers at all. We are not trying to optimize SEO hits or the like here. That's why the point of ITN is about featuring quality articles that are in the news (in line with all other sections of the main page) , not about being a news ticker simply to index hot news topics. — Masem (t) 23:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Masem: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is that way. BangJan1999 23:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That doesn't mean Masem's comment as it related to how ITN decisions are made isn't relevant. DarkSide830 (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Why would anyone need to go to ANI about this? Y'all are weird. Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe because this has been a consistent yet constant feature of AD on ITN/C, and of the multiple folks who have tried their best to remind him that no, ITN is not a news ticker. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 23:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Still has a lot of citation needed tags, and 2 orange tags on the article. Natg 19 (talk) 05:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb. Not remotely of the same stature as Thatcher or Mandela, the usual benchmarks for the kind of globally known figure that would be posted. Blurbs are not just for people who did well in life and very successful, they're for the deaths that make you stop in your tracks when you see them. Also some way off on quality, so seems unlikely it will even make RD at this point, but who knows.  — Amakuru (talk) 06:18, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support blurb Easily one of the most important actors of the 20th century. If Delon doesn't get a blurb then there's little hope for any non-hollywood actors getting a blurb. Flyingfishee (talk) 03:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Belmondo did. It's a moot point with the the outstanding page quality concerns. —Bagumba (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 17

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections


    (Posted) RD: Silvio Santos

    [edit]
    Article: Silvio Santos (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): [16] [17]
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Brazilian media mogul and television host. He was the host of the second longest running Brazilian program: Programa Silvio Santos, aired since 1963. He was also the only celebrity in the country on the list of billionaires by Forbes magazine. The magazine also states that "there is no one more famous than Silvio Santos in Brazil." Maeslor

    • Conditional oppose: I have no doubt he is a major figure in the country as both an entrepreneur and a television presenter, but the article on EN needs work (Portuguese Wikipedia has a more substantive article we could translate from. This one is not as complete and even cites YouTube in places). ViperSnake151  Talk  00:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have just translated the Death of Silvio Santos page, going on the background, announcement, and reactions in Brazil and worldwide. Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Black Caviar

    [edit]
    Article: Black Caviar (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): ABC News Sydney Morning Herald
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Famous Australian racehorse. Aydoh8[contribs] 05:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support looks good enough to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case - protest

    [edit]
    Article: 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ Protset in support of R G Kar Medical College (pictured)A rape and murder incident prompts protests across India. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: ​ In India, doctors go on strike and nationwide protests occur after the rape and murder of a woman physician in Kolkata.
    News source(s): News [18][19][20]
    Credits:
    Article updated

    Nominator's comments: 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case. Spworld2 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Snow oppose Horrifying case, but ITN usually doesn't post crimes committed against individual people. Furthermore, the article is not complete. Bremps... 06:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Outdated. Bremps... 22:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Usually this is not a small case against individuals, they were raped and killed with great brutality, public protests are continuing in all cities of India against this, doctors are also on strike in India.[21][22] [23][24][25][26][27] Spworld2 (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also you can't call WP:SNOW on the 1st comment Abcmaxx (talk) 13:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    By that logic, George Floyd's murder wouldn't make it to ITN. –Jiaminglimjm (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Post posting support The original blurb said nothing about any protests. Bremps... 22:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose - "The incident took place when 'Trainee Doctor', a 31-year-old Trainee Doctor,......" sentence just ends there. No way we can post this, article doesn't even tell you what happened PrecariousWorlds (talk) 06:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    RD is mostly for the deaths of notable people/organisms, not for murder cases, even if high-profile. Good faith nom PrecariousWorlds (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is a law in India that the name of the victim in a rape case should not be disclosed Spworld2 (talk) 06:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    At the time I wrote that the article literally just consisted of 'a 31-year-old trainee doctor'. That was the only information about the incident in the entire article. I wasn't referring to the victim's name.PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The article has come a long way since, I do think its in a decent (not great) place for posting Schwinnspeed (talk) 22:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    [28][29] [30][31][32][33][34] Spworld2 (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly. I was gonna the same the same to the first comment above. Brutal as a rape is, they're not so unusual in the country.Sportsnut24 (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Need to sort out which article is. the Alt that is not "incident" is best.Sportsnut24 (talk) 04:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Altblurb The incident have received widespread international coverage. The news about it has been featured on the multiple international newspaper's front page. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support altblurb, really terrible news and the strikes have been gaining more coverage as Prince of Punjab said Dyaquna (talk) 02:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I do find it perplexing that the article focuses on the murder rather than the protests themselves. Most of the article's prose cover the protests. I understand they were much larger (early returns, granted), but wouldn't an incident such as the Mahsa Amini protests inform precedent on article focus here? DarkSide830 (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 16

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Science and technology


    (Posted) RD: Daniela Larreal

    [edit]
    Article: Daniela Larreal (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Diario de la Americas News.com.au
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Venezuelan cyclist; death announced on this date. Kingsif (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Scott Bloomquist

    [edit]
    Article: Scott Bloomquist (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Associated Press, CNN
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American dirt track racing driver. 240F:7A:6253:1:9DB7:B240:8923:9CF9 (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose multiple orange tags that needs to be resolved. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 15:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Afa Anoaʻi

    [edit]
    Article: Afa Anoaʻi (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Wrestling Observer-Figure Four Online, WWE
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Samoan pro wrestler, one half of the Wild Samoans. Article is actually pretty solid quality/citation-wise for a wrestling bio. The Kip (contribs) 22:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: John Lansing (journalist)

    [edit]
    Article: John Lansing (journalist) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): NPR
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Former CEO of NPR and chief of the U.S. Agency for Global Media. ForsythiaJo (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article in a good enough shape. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    PostedBagumba (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) Paetongtarn chosen as new Thai PM

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Paetongtarn Shinawatra
    Article: Paetongtarn Shinawatra (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Paetongtarn Shinawatra is chosen as Prime Minister of Thailand by the House of Representatives, replacing Srettha Thavisin who was dismissed by the Constitutional Court. (Post)
    News source(s): Bloomberg BBC News The Guardian
    Credits:

    The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

    Propose to merge with the existing blurb on Srettha's dismissal, just like how we did with the Bangladesh PM. Tofusaurus (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support merge as per above. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 12:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support merger pre above Prodrummer619 (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Pull - Posting this was premature. She hasn't yet been formally appointed prime minister. [36] estar8806 (talk) 18:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The King has officially appointed her as Prime Minister. [37] Tofusaurus (talk) 04:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    U.S. results are regularly posted before a formal presidential inauguration. Let's be consistent, one way or another.—Bagumba (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 15

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    International relations

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Sports


    (Posted) RD: Charis Eng

    [edit]
    Article: Charis Eng (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): PTEN Research, Cleveland Plain Dealer
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    SpencerT•C 00:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article seems alright to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Missing any prose on death.—Bagumba (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bagumba: Added. SpencerT•C 18:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Jack Russell (musician)

    [edit]
    Article: Jack Russell (musician) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Billboard, NPR
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American musician and founding member of Great White. 240F:7A:6253:1:5994:D657:3789:8602 (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose a large number of unsourced information. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Chicxulub impactor originated from the outer Solar System

    [edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Article: Chicxulub crater (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Chicxulub impactor originated from the outer Solar System (Post)
    Alternative blurb: ​ The Chicxulub asteroid has been found to be a carbonaceous asteroid which formed in the outer Solar System
    News source(s): Science, [38]
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Count Iblis (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    (Posted) RD: Peter Marshall

    [edit]
    Article: Peter Marshall (entertainer) (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Variety
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    A few citations needed, but well-sourced overall. Mooonswimmer 18:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Greg Kihn

    [edit]
    Article: Greg Kihn (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): KRON 4
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Article does need some help in a few places, but for many in the early 80s, Greg Kihn was the leader of The Greg Kihn Band and songwriter for the band, which had hits "Jeopardy (song)", "The Breakup Song" and several other in the early 80s. Weird Al covered "Jeopardy" as "I Lost on Jeopardy", where many know that song from. He also did some writing. TheCorriynial (talk) 16:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose per usual. Aydoh8[contribs] 12:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose multiple cn tags and many paragraphs ending without a footnote. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Lasse Björn

    [edit]
    Article: Lasse Björn (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): https://www.svt.se/sport/ishockey/lasse-bjorn-ar-dod-blev-92-ar
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Olympic ice hockey and Ice Hockey World Championship medallist. Article is a bit short and could be expanded, but everything is cited. Flibirigit (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    National Public Data breach

    [edit]
    Article: National Public Data (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ Data brokering service National Public Data suffers a breach of 2.7 billion records, potentially including the Social Security numbers of every living American. (Post)
    News source(s): (CBS News)
    Credits:

    Data breach potentially containing the Social Security number of every living American. Breach occurred last April, but now a lawsuit's being filed and it's receiving widespread coverage. Article needs work. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose If the breach occurred last April, it is too stale to be presented as news in ITN, and the lawsuit isn't that newsworthy if the breach itself went under the radar at first. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Article is not nearly ready, and the item is stale to begin with. Estreyeria (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose and close immediatelyTroy Hunt has written a post about this data breach. The data present has not been confirmed for accuracy and is unlikely to be. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose besides the stake Ness and quality issues, data breaches are far too common nowadays to make this anything but routine. Also, importantly, this us only a claim from the lawsuit, nothing has been affirmed here. The signs are likely that it's true but we have no confirmation yet. Masem (t) 14:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment The agency has confirmed the breech but keep in mind, this is 2.9 billion records which is not yet known how many people that actually is, since there can be multiple records per person. Further, the article itself is still far too short for quality purposes. --Masem (t) 11:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment - precedent has shown that stories that technically occurred a while back can still be posted if it only entered into the news discourse recently. Anyway, weak oppose, per ElijahPepe. — Knightoftheswords 14:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose As per above, the breach is a claim from a lawsuit, and does not seem to be definitively confirmed. Gödel2200 (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support if confirmed. This is a *huge* data breach, and its purported occurrence only recently came to light, assuming the charges made in the lawsuit are correct. Kurtis (talk) 00:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose notability since not confirmed Iff it's confirmed, take this to be a support on notability. Sure, large data breaches are common, but so are national elections, sports championships, and any of a half-dozen other things listed at ITNR. That shouldn't preclude something from being posted. The impact would be wide-reaching, and thus worth posting. For now, though, the accuracy is not certain nor the source. And don't even get me started on the article quality. Sincerely, Dilettante 03:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment The breach has been confirmed by National Public Data. The leaked information is confirmed to include "name, email address, phone number, social security number, and mailing address(es)", but the scale of the breach (i.e. the figure of 2.7-2.9 billion) has not yet been specified or acknowledged. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 14

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Health and environment

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections


    RD: Gena Rowlands

    [edit]
    Article: Gena Rowlands (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): The Wrap
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Award winning American actress. Thriley (talk) 00:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Raising at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. Curbon7 (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose outstanding number of cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) WHO declares global health emergency over Mpox outbreak

    [edit]
    Article: African mpox epidemic (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ The World Health Organization declares the 2024 African mpox epidemic to be a global health emergency. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: ​ The World Health Organization declares the African mpox epidemic to be a global health emergency.
    News source(s): New York Times
    Credits:

    Last time it was declared an emergency, it killed around 200 people. It seems to be alot more serious now, as death count has already risen to well above 500. TwistedAxe [contact] 17:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wait there is no way that stub of an article is ready for an ITN item. Scu ba (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment - Literally one sentence, unfit for posting. Also, did we post monkeypox being designated as a global health emergency back in 2022? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support A big announcement, but the actual Mpox Outbreak page should be linked somewhere within the blurb itself Hungry403 (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Qualified support. The article is relevant but quality is poor. The timeline is confusing. It's my bedtime otherwise I would contribute. Bob (talk) 19:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) Dismissal of Thai PM

    [edit]
    Proposed image
    Thavisin in 2023
    Article: Srettha Thavisin (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: Thailand's Constitutional Court dismisses Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin following an illegal cabinet appointment of a minister. (Post)
    News source(s): Reuters CNN
    Credits:

    Tofusaurus (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support The event is notable, and the article is well-sourced and of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support a head of government got removed from office. This is notable enough for inclusion. Scu ba (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support because it's a change in head of government.
    JohnAdams1800 (talk) 18:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support The removal of Thailand’s PM is quite notable & the article’s quality is good enough to post. However, I’m not entirely satisfied w/the blurb’s wording since this seems to be politically motivated & the blurb’s wording doesn’t make that clear enough. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 19:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I was going to say this. Maybe add an allegedly? The CC is very obviously biased towards the conservative, royal elite. River10000 (talk) 20:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That might work. However, reliable sources link this ruling to a ruling that happened 1 week ago that banned MFP politicians from politics, so it might be better to have an alt blurb that says:

    Thailand's Constitutional Court dismisses Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin one week after a ruling dissolved the Move Forward Party and banned its executives from politics.

    Blaylockjam10 (talk) 22:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Or maybe a
    Thailand's Constitutional Court removes Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, alleging illegal appointment of a cabinet member. River10000 (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ... reliable sources link this ruling to a ruling that happened 1 week ago ...: They are mentioned together in some sources, but do any of them say that the MFP being dissolved caused the PM's dismissal? —Bagumba (talk) 03:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a slippery slope if we start using "allegedly" for court rulings. The ruling and their reasoning are fact, even if one argues its flawed (or if its eventually overturned or generally decried). —Bagumba (talk) 03:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support on notability, removal of an active head of government by a court is very much notable. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 13

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Science and technology

    • Ford and Mazda issue warnings to owners of over 475,000 vehicles with Takata airbag inflators, cautioning them of the possibility for the inflators to explode with metal shrapnel. (AP)

    (Posted) RD: Dan Dorazio

    [edit]
    Article: Dan Dorazio (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Dignity Memorial, SI, MooseJawToday
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support article looks in a good shape to me. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Wally Amos

    [edit]
    Article: Wally Amos (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): NY Times
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Founder of Famous Amos cookie company. Host of the PBS television show Learn to Read. Thriley (talk) 19:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support nothing major holding the article back. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ 14:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Richard Alatorre

    [edit]
    Article: Richard Alatorre (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Los Angeles Times
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Former Los Angeles councilman. 240F:7A:6253:1:B9C1:EAA6:9B64:55C7 (talk)

    August 12

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Arts and culture

    Business and economy

    Disasters and accidents

    Law and crime

    Politics and elections

    Science and technology

    • Water on Mars
      • Liquid water is confirmed to be present at depths of 10–20 km (6.2–12.4 mi) below the surface of Mars, based on a new analysis of data from NASA's InSight lander. (BBC News)

    (Posted) RD: Christof Nel

    [edit]
    Article: Christof Nel (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): NDR
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Stage director of drama and especially opera at major houses in Germany, influential teacher in his last years. - Another article remembered from DYK 2019, but many refs needed to be replaced. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support looks well-cited and ready to go. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 15:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Timothy Dudley-Smith

    [edit]
    Article: Timothy Dudley-Smith (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Christianity Today BBC
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Article is short but in good shape. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 22:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support if the selected works can serve as citations for themselves. Bremps... 06:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll try to find ISBNs tonight. Thanks for pointing it out! ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 17:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bremps  Done all isbns added. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 00:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Reservations gone, support. Bremps... 00:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Liquid water on Mars

    [edit]
    Article: Water on Mars (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ Analysis of data from the InSight Mars mission indicates the presence of underground liquid water on Mars. (Post)
    News source(s): BBC, PNAS
    Credits:

    Article needs to be updated (currently only a one line update exists) but the topic is receiving significant news coverage. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 01:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Support once the article has been sufficiently expanded. Important milestone. Yakikaki (talk) 07:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Needs work The article currently starts "Almost all water on Mars today exists as polar permafrost ice..." and continues in that vein. If this new analysis indicates that there are substantial underground seas of liquid water then the article will need completely rebalancing to account for this. An isolated update is not enough. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Opppose on quality concerns, the lead needs a lot of work, I had to search the article to find the story here. Also, possible sustained oppose because it appears this was known in 2018 from the Mars Express mission. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Given the chronology of discoveries of water on Mars dating back to the 1970s, what makes this discovery of water on Mars different? If that difference is significant, it should be in the blurb. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Money pull quote from the Beeb article: While there is water frozen at the Martian poles and evidence of vapour in the atmosphere, this is the first time liquid water has been found on the planet. I agree quite a bit that "science news" often does a poor job of immediately telling people the most important thing(s) up front: "don't bury the lede" is a tenet of good journalism. (One contributing factor: the people writing and editing the coverage, often have little to no expert scientific background, and often struggle to understand themselves the things they are attempting to tell people about, which often are communicated in the house jargon of scientific journals etc. Sure, you could contact professional scientists to seek explanation (who mostly have day jobs and do such things, when they do, as an unpaid volunteer service on top of that) but, there's that deadline and your boss has been breathing down your neck lately to get those viewership metrics up. Gotta get those social media "shares" before competitors beat you.) Blurb suggestion: Analysis… indicates the presence on Mars of underground liquid water. --Slowking Man (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree in principle if a main target can be improved. Maybe InSight? This is evidence of present-day liquid water underground in the Martian crust. Existence of (lots of) liquid water long ago in Mars's past has been accepted for some time, and solid water ice and gaseous water vapor are known to exist, but liquid water at Mars's surface beyond tiny transient amounts is presumed impossible today because of Mars's low atmospheric pressure. (See phase diagram. Familiar with how a pressure cooker works? Now think about how freeze drying works—which is accomplished by going the other direction and lowering ambient pressure to near-zero.) Scientists have been interested in answers to what happened to all that water. And it looks like at least some is still there deep underground, where it's under enough pressure to stay liquid. --Slowking Man (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Opppose Call me when you can fill a glass. None of this "traces of" or long-ago stuff. CoatCheck (talk) 00:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Ring ring. It's here right now and there's a lot of it. Bremps... 03:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      From that CNN article: "Banerdt, who was not involved in the research, said that while the interpretation of the data presented in the paper is strongly supported with good arguments, he also believes it is still somewhat speculative and that there is almost always another way to explain any given set of data.", a far cry short of these "scientists have found ___" pronouncements. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 03:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose. This is a single paper, and the BBC article makes claims that the scientific paper does not -- BBC: "Scientists have discovered a reservoir of liquid water on Mars - deep in the rocky outer crust of the planet. -- paper: "A mid-crust composed of fractured igneous rocks saturated with liquid water best explains the existing data." This is fairly irresponsible journalism. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 03:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Weak oppose per 35.139.154.158. This is still a pretty tentative discovery. Additionally, it isn't even the first potential detection of large reservoirs of liquid water on Mars—see Subglacial lakes on Mars. I am only marking this as a weak oppose as this is an in situ detection from the InSight lander, which may be ITN-worthy; I would personally say it still isn't. ArkHyena (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose per 35.139.154.158. I'd totally support putting this on the front page if it was a more substantiated claim (and if the article was in shape, which it's not). Estreyeria (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose a problem for astronomy is that standard news outlet aimed for the general public just love to jump to conclusions. Fact is, the lander found some data, and someone wrote a paper saying that underground water may be an explanation for that data. There's still a huge distance from that to actually confirming such water. Scientists should formulate alternative explanations for the data, and all explanations should be tested further (or get updated if further data is obtained). Cambalachero (talk) 16:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose A few things: 1) the article itself is mostly about the historical context behind the present lack of water on mars- there is one sentence about the current update buried deep in the lead 2) The media's interpretation of the scientific paper is a stretch and still a little speculative. Schwinnspeed (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Rachael Lillis

    [edit]
    Article: Rachael Lillis (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): NYTimes, Anime News Network
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Voice actress, known for voicing the English voices of Misty and Jessie from Pokemon. Died on August 10 but was only reported on this date. Tofusaurus (talk) 16:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @PFHLai: I expanded the article. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, @Blaylockjam10, for expanding the stubby wikibio to start-class. However, there are still quite a few roles listed in the filmography table that need sourcing. And there are zero support !votes here on ITN/C for this nom. I can check back in a few hours.... --PFHLai (talk) 02:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Richard Lugner

    [edit]
    Article: Richard Lugner (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Euronews, Barron's, Der Spiegel, Berliner Morgenpost, Tagesschau
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Austrian construction titan, politician, and Viennese society figure. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 11

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Disasters and accidents

    International relations

    Politics and elections

    Sports


    RD: Daniela Larreal

    [edit]
    Article: Daniela Larreal (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Diario Las Américas
    Credits:

    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Venezuelan track cyclist NoonIcarus (talk) 21:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Elizabeth A. R. Brown

    [edit]
    Article: Elizabeth A. R. Brown (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Legacy.com
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    American medievalist. Thriley (talk) 22:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Noël Treanor

    [edit]
    Article: Noël Treanor (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): BBC, The Irish Times
    Credits:
    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Irish Roman Catholic prelate. 240F:7A:6253:1:2942:2E99:912C:AA25 (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support Minor tone issues but honestly nothing to fuss about. Bremps... 02:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    PostedBagumba (talk) 04:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Olympics

    [edit]
    Article: 2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony (talk · history · tag)
    Blurb: ​ The 2024 Summer Olympics ends with the closing ceremony. (Post)
    Alternative blurb: ​ The 2024 Summer Olympics closes, with the United States winning the most medals.
    Alternative blurb II: ​ The 2024 Summer Olympics conclude in Paris, France.
    Credits:

    Article updated
    The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

    Starts in under 5.5 hours, but just thought to put it here for discussion so it can be live as it is ongoing.Sportsnut24 (talk) 13:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC) }}[reply]

    I am just cleaning up the sourcing precisely for these objections. Only women's basketball left, but will find som more prose. Obviously in preparations since we can't know everything exactly.Sportsnut24 (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have just added some prose to the events itself. Few sentences should be the mimumum required.Sportsnut24 (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you! The sections for foreign dignitaries and commentators being mostly uncited was one of the reasons the opening ceremony didn't get posted, so hopefully that will not also be the case here (as more gets added to the article). Gödel2200 (talk) 14:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A few sentences of text followed by endless incomplete or improperly sourced lists is not enough to meet WP:ITNQUALITY and is a clear violation of MOS:PROSE. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This is true, but the ceremony hasn't happened yet, so it is no surprise the article has not been expanded. Gödel2200 (talk) 16:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How is the official source improper? There are several prose sentences of the event.Sportsnut24 (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong oppose altblurb the Olympics medal tally is measured by the number of gold medals, with silver and bronze only used in tie-breakers. It is technically correct to state that the US won the most medals, but the usage of this implies that the US 'won' the Olympics, which they didn't (China did) and might be a breach of NPOV. The prose issues brought up by @Joseph2302 (pinging for courtesy) look like they've been fixed, although article might need some more sources. In this case I'm leaning support. Also the closing ceremony just wrapped up, so pull from ongoing. Aydoh8[contribs] 22:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Officially, isn't the rule if golds are tied, then most silver medals declares the "winner"? But, I don't think I've seen anything saying China "won." I've seen "tied" used, but nothing else outside of that. TheCorriynial (talk) 22:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    D'oh. Didn't realise they were tied on golds (I thought China was still ahead). Thank you for reminding me, I've just updated my vote. Aydoh8[contribs] 22:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    silly to mention that nonsense. the NEWS is the closingSportsnut24 (talk) 23:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It would seem to make sense that until we have a blurb up on the closing, keeping the ongoing for 24-48 hrs for ppl coming late to see the final results would be reasonable. But after 48hr, yes, its definitely should be removed. — Masem (t) 02:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree, Support but remove after 48h PrecariousWorlds (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's been removed. Stephen 03:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose It makes more sense to just pull the Olympics from ongoing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 06:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The closing ceremony is listed in ITN/R so the only concern is the quality. Also, it's been pulled already. 82.193.210.78 (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose as the closing ceremony article is a sloppy mix of plans, predictions and actual outcomes. Just leave the Ongoing entry up for a day and then it's done. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment - the closing ceremony of the Summer Olympics (and their winter components for that matter) are WP:INTR per Wikipedia:In the news/Recurring items#Multi-sport events. If you have an issue with that, take it to the talk page, not here. — Knightoftheswords 13:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think anyone is opposed to the ITNR nature of this, but that the current article is of very low quality that pits not in a condition to post, which is a requirement ITNR or not. Masem (t) 18:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Andrew Davidson, MtPenguinMonster, and DecafPotato: would beg to differ — Knightoftheswords 12:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The article currently seems to finish in mid-air with a half-baked section called "Victory Ceremony". It's puzzling... Andrew🐉(talk) 13:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Andrew Davidson: I've significantly expanded that section with a paragraph of prose. Do you think it would be good now? DecafPotato (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I got the gist of it but it seemed to need copy-editing so I reworked it. It's still rather puzzling as there's a claim that this was "gender parity" but only the women got special attention. That's not what parity means. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To clarify, the Paris Olympics were the first Olympics with gender parity (i.e. an equal number of male and female athletes), and so the organizing committee highlighted the women's marathon winner instead of the traditional men's marathon winner to celebrate how far women's sports have come. DecafPotato (talk) 08:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The Tokyo Olympics had parity with both the men and women's winners featured in the closing ceremony. This time, they featured only women even though most of the men in the event ran faster than the winning woman (67 men ran faster than 2:22:55). That's gender bias not gender parity. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment – Why don't we just bold the Summer Olympics article instead of that of the closing ceremony? It's what most readers are looking for and is of a much higher quality. DecafPotato (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The main Summer Olympics article itself has already been 'featured' on ITN on the Ongoing events line for about two weeks. There would need some significant consensus to move that back to a blurb that could possibly last on ITN another week, given the amount of updates (or relative lack thereof) since it was removed from Ongoing. Zzyzx11 (talk) 13:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I've re-opened the nomination for the following two reasons. Firstly, the opposition is mostly on quality grounds. Secondly, this isn't stale as the oldest blurb documents a story from 1 August 2024.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not ready I've changed the headings to sentence case but someone else will have to provide referencing for the anthems. Schwede66 23:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 10

    [edit]

    Armed conflicts and attacks

    Arts and culture

    Disasters and accidents

    Politics and elections

    Sports


    (Posted) RD: Celestina Casapietra

    [edit]
    Article: Celestina Casapietra (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Berliner Zeitung
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Italian soprano who was "married" to the Berlin State Opera from 1965 to 1993, leading roles, also in Europe. - I knew the article from DYK days in 2019, but it's better now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Tuíre Kayapó

    [edit]
    Article: Tuíre Kayapó (talk · history · tag)
    Recent deaths nomination (Post)
    News source(s): Globo article, Tribute from government website
    Credits:

    Article updated
    Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

    Brazilian indigenous activist and leader. ForsythiaJo (talk) 01:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support Article quality is up to par. Bremps... 02:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support what Bremps said --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Issue There is a source WP:INTEGRITY issue in the article, as the source next to her death does not cover her actual death. Also, the article says she died at 54, while a later citation from G1 says 57.[40] Her birth year might also need updating.—Bagumba (talk) 03:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added a footnote about the uncertainty of her age at death/year of birth - thank you for bringing this discrepancy up! ForsythiaJo (talk) 18:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support issue was addressed; article ready. FlipandFlopped 20:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 9

    [edit]

    (Posted) RD: Kasper König

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Influential for modern art as curator, publisher, professor, museum director. There was a minimal article. He'd deserve more detail (which is in the sources), but time is running out. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Ida Bagus Ardana

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Former bureaucrat and politician in Bali; found dead in his house under mysterious circumstances. --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 15:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed; posted RD) RD: Susan Wojcicki

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate Former CEO of Youtube. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 05:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Other publications are now reporting this as well. Natg 19 (talk) 06:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Alrighty. My search engine probably has not caught up. :) I support nomination now. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 06:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD Worth mentioning and everyone is talking about it in Social Media, can't see why we cannot put a CEO's name who foresaw the globalisation of internet entertainment in the past couple of years .Fluddsskark (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support ITN/Blurb She was a very, very well known CEO of one of the biggest platforms in the world and sat in her position for the past 10 years. If the consensus is RD, consider this support RD. TwistedAxe [contact] 10:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Picture Recent discussions on ITN's talk page show strong support for posting pictures for RDs and changing ITN's picture every day. The aircraft picture has been posted for over a day now and we have a good picture of this person so let's use it. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • PP Support for RD respectfully oppose blurb. Notable? Certainly. On the same level as Warren Buffet, Elon Musk or Bill Gates? No. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support blurb - not only did she have a substantial impact on YouTube, but she was an effective queenpin in Google for a decade and a half prior to becoming CEO. — Knightoftheswords 13:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb Notable but figuring out how to monetize humans staring at photons emitted from a substrate isn't exactly newsworthy. Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Monetizing humans looking a photons from a substrate has been universally acknowledged as one of the most important events of the past half century. — Knightoftheswords 12:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yea, but am I not allowed to be grumpy about it? Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      That feels like a bit of a reach, and even if we believe this, does Wojcicki get outsized credit for the idea? DarkSide830 (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb did not have major world influence or importance. I would argue that most CEOs should not be blurbed, outside of newsworthy/major figures such as Steve Jobs, Warren Buffett, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, or Bill Gates. Natg 19 (talk) 20:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Neutral on blurb. Not like I would be torn up over running; to me it's sort of "close to the line" and could go either way really. To me the "transformational figure" thing ought to be something easy to quantify: did major news outlets in multiple countries regularly "hang on their every word" so to speak, and run stories solely about: "Person X said/did thing Y"? People mentioned like Gates and Warren easily qualify; looking to other shores, Jack Ma is one who comes to mind. It needs to be solely about quantifiable data that people broadly agree upon (a "consensus" of sorts you might say), not everyone's individual subjective judgments which will frequently differ. --Slowking Man (talk) 20:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose blurb. Not a global household name. Sandstein 11:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    (Posted) RD: Steve Symms

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Former U.S. Senator from Idaho. Died yesterday, but death announced today. Article seems to be in pretty good shape. Curbon7 (talk) 00:34, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) Voepass Linhas Aéreas Flight 2283

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate Deadliest commercial aircraft accident of 2024. Picture is of aircraft operated by previous airline. Additional source for no survivors. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 18:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support This is a very major incident. Stuart2202 (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    RD: Kevin Sullivan (wrestler)

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate American professional wrestler. 240F:7A:6253:1:BC2A:8EA5:908C:9F2A (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 8

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 8 Template:Cob


    RD: Mitzi McCall

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate American actress and comedian. 240F:7A:6253:1:300E:366:F55B:E06A (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Issa Hayatou

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Former president of CAF and former interim president of FIFA. 240F:7A:6253:1:1131:B696:A25D:A8D (talk) 06:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Chi-Chi Rodríguez

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Puerto Rican golfer. Staraction (talk | contribs) 04:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Kalatiku Paembonan

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 17:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) RD: Jack Karlson

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate The Succulent Chinese Meal man. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Strong oppose and suggest close, he doesn't have his own Wikipedia article. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 12:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Template:Ping There is precidence for this when we ran Barry Chuckle who also didn't have his own individual page. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 13:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose Template:Tq This is not one of those cases since this is not a group like the other one was.
    Noah, BSBATalk 13:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support - the article is effectively about him since he's the central figure of the whole meme. Karlson's name is even bolded in in the article. — Knightoftheswords 14:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Per above, does not meet the criteria for WP:ITNRD. Estreyeria (talk) 15:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support He is the entirety of what appears in the video. Celjski Grad (talk) 15:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Karlson is the central person of the topic. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose even taken into account that the central figure of the video is this person and that there us no standalone for him, the coverage of him in this article as a person is trivially short and indicates that he had little notability, the video itself was. Masem (t) 19:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Despite this individual not meeting the criteria set forth in WP:ITNRD does not mean his death cannot be mentioned. BLP protections apply to the page for which he’s mentioned in, and we should make consideration for slightly modifying the requirement mentioned above around “groups”, eg: “groups or cultural icons (memes)”. Hide the Pain Harold definitely needs a RD (when the time comes). Kcmastrpc (talk) 21:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    BLP applies everywhere, the protections are used on any page where BLP violations have occurred or likely to occur. Just being tagged with such protection doesn't make the page a BLP. — Masem (t) 23:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Weak Support I think one of the main reasons RDs for members of groups is allowed is because the page for a group will most likely contain a fair deal of biographical information relating to the members of the group. The current article does contain a bit of biographical information, which I consider just barely enough to be posted. Gödel2200 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose This is not a biography, and therefore it doesn't meet ITNRD. This article is about the video, not him. He is not sufficiently covered. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose. We do not have a biographical article. While the subject who was the primary individual featured in the video did indeed die, but our criteria for recent deaths does not expand to this scope. The guidance permits that Template:Tq (emphasis mine), but we have no such biographical article for this individual. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose. Per most of the above. The article in question is mostly about the video and isn't a biography article. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 02:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Procedural oppose' per above but am not opposed to taking another look at the criteria This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 04:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Haven’t there been names run on RD who have been the subjects of “death of” or “killing of” articles? If that’s happened before, I don’t see any reason why Karlson shouldn’t run. Thriley (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment Not to mention Jack Karlson exists as a redirect, but I guess that's not enough either? Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The issue to me is that we have one paragraph of biographical material in this article. If that could be significantly expanded, that might be a reason, but his biography is basically a side note to the fame of the video. Masem (t) 13:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      We have sometimes made exceptions for persons who are exceptionally famous or infamous for a single thing, such as serial killers, where they are discussed at length in the article on their crimes. But I don't think this falls into that category. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Well yes we can't compare serial killers to someone arrested for eating a meal (a Succulent Chinese Meal!). However, it is a video that has taken on a cultural life of its own, including in depth dives into Karlson's history and the fact that we have international coverage worldwide that doesn't happen for many internet memes indicates to me that this may be one of those exceptions of being famous for one thing. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose per most of the above. Subject does not meet the customary criteria for RD, which usually requires a stand-alone article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support Seems kind of bureaucratic to exclude based on the focus which is primarily concerning Karlson, the subject of the meme video, and contains biographical information about Karlson. -- GreenC 16:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support The subject has an obituary in The Times and it doesn't get any better than that. As he seems quite notable, I suppose that the main complication hitherto has been his multiple aliases but his death seems to have clarified that. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      As I said above, if there was more than a paragraph of actual bio info (hint: that obit can be used to fill in some more) then it would be reasonable to post. But right now, its still a tiny single paragraph within the entire article and includes an unsourced statement (plus the writing is extremely informal for an encyclopedic article). It could get there but the bio must be expanded. Masem (t) 17:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      If you said this above, then you're repeating yourself contrary to WP:BLUDGEON. Please don't horn in on other editors' !votes. "Democracy Manifest!". 20:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Andrew🐉(talk) 20:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      And I'm saying that if with this bios we can get that section past a single biographic paragraph, it may be reasonable to post for RD, but while it is only one paragraph and a missing source on a sentence, it fails the quality expectations for BLP articles to even be featured on the main page. Those that want to see it posted should take the time to work on that improvement. Masem (t) 20:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support Obituaries from the BBC and The Guardian in addition to The Times. Thriley (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment WP:ITNRD reads: Template:Tq2Bagumba (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Central figure within the article, still see content about this guy today Hungry403 (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose If a person doesn't have their own WP article, their death shouldn't be posted in ITNRD. TwistedAxe [contact] 16:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC) Template:Abot[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Taberon Honie

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    August 7

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 7 Template:Cob


    RD: Patrice Laffont

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Varoon2542 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:29, 12 August, 2024 (UTC)

    (Closed) Banning of MFP

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

    • This is an important development in the flawed democracy of Thailand, specifically with the banning of the party exec. from politics; he was arguably the most popular politician in Thailand. While the MFP will move to a new party, the lingering effect will stay. River10000 (talk) 19:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support alt 3 Event is noteworthy, the official opposition party was banned, and this blurb is the best at describing it. Scu ba (talk) 23:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support alt 3, definitely noteworthy and that is the most concise blurb. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose for ITN, though I will include it in 2024. This is not a change in head of state/government, as Pita Limjaroenrat was not the incumbent prime minister or a similar position. Party dissolutions are common in Thailand, and this doesn't have sufficient due weight for ITN. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 23:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Weak oppose I think from what I read and per JohnAdams, all that's happening is because the high court said that the party's stance against the lèse-majesté law (which violates criticism of the royal family) was unconstitutional and had to dissolve the party, but for all purposes, they're all just jumping over to a new party that does not have a stance on lèse-majesté. If anything, there would need to be more focus on this aspect around the lèse-majesté law issue, not just the simple disbanding of the party and reforming as something else. Further, it reads that this party already was born of the ashes from a previous party one or two years ago, so this is not uncommon. --Masem (t) 00:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment yeah, sure, but this is the main opposition party, technically the second largest party in the country, the only meaningful voice of discontent against the government, and they got banned for due to a rather unpopular law protecting the royals. Scu ba (talk) 00:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And as they filter into the new party that is being formed in its wake, that will likely become the main opposition party. The story is really around the law and ruling from the supreme court, the effect of breaking up the party more the side result from that. Masem (t) 20:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    (Posted) RD: Jon McBride

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    Support article looks good Scu ba (talk) 23:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Battle of Tinzaouaten (2024)

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate Though the attack occurred over a week ago, it has gained international attention after Mali cut ties with Ukraine for admitting, and then denying, involvement in an attack with high casualties. Also part of a trend of West African states pivoting towards Russia. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 12:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose per above Ion.want.uu (talk) 14:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose per above
    Personisinsterest (talk) 16:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    August 6

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 6 Template:Cob


    2024 Kursk Offensive

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Yes this is an ongoing item, but this is all over the news, and is the first major Ukrainian offensive in over a year (we blurbed the last one too). It's a major event that I think is notable to post on its own PrecariousWorlds (talk) 20:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Oppose Good faith nom. However, I respectfully disagree with the OP. There is no evidence of any really extraordinary military significance to this that would justify giving it a blurb when it's already covered in ongoing. Lots of stuff gets news coverage that we don't blurb. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wait The offensive is definitely significant compared to previous incursions into Russia, but the scale remains to be seen in full. Either way, this "man bites dog" story might be the most notable thing coming out of Ukraine in nearly a year, so not opposed to blurbing if it keeps gaining in scope. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose at this point. When we have broken ongoing conflicts to post a blurb, it is generally for a major result, not at the start of some shorter-term event. If Ukraine succeeds at this, that might be worth posting, but if its otherwise a wash, there's really no story then. --Masem (t) 22:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wait per Chaotic Enby. On one hand feels like it's covered by ongoing, but on the other, the first significant ground operation by official Ukrainian forces in Russia proper might surpass that threshold. The Kip (contribs) 02:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait per Kip and Enby. This may drastically affect how the conflict goes, or may not be significant at all, hard to tell at the moment. Hungry403 (talk) 02:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait This is a significant escalation in the war, seeing as Ukraine hasn't gone into Russian territory before, but I would wait until a significant town/city is captured since so far it seems to be only minor border towns Dyaquna (talk) 22:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Doris Brougham

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Yes, article has an orange tag. Will try to resolve to get posted. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 02:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose with regret. The orange tag is still on there Template:Ping and there are too many unsourced claims in there. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 10:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's alright. I kind of forgot about the nomination myself and have become too busy to improve it. It's mostly awards and college degrees that are un-cited--stuff that could be easily removed. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 15:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Updated) Muhammad Yunus appointed as new interim leader

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Out with the old, in with the new. The current blurb about Sheik Hasina might be incorporated in this but the main thing is to report the new leader. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Yahya Sinwar appointed Hamas Chairman

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate Support New Head of state, notable coverage in the media, currently relevant geopolitically Scu ba (talk) 22:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Strong oppose, Gaza is not a state but part of the Palestinian Territories, Hamas does govern Gaza partially, but it is ultimately a militant group. Not notable, covered by ongoing. Personisinsterest (talk) 00:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose per Personisinterest. The Hamas Political Bureau is not the recognised government. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:36, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose because Hamas is not a government, but a belligerent in an ongoing war. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 04:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To play Devil's Advocate Hamas does organise a government that is the de facto ruling authority of parts of the Gaza Strip not occupied by Israel. However it can be mostly characterised as a militant terrorist group, and so I don't support blurbing this PrecariousWorlds (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    (Posted) RD: Billy Bean

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Not to be confused with Billy Beane. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:33, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Connie Chiume

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate South African actress. 240F:7A:6253:1:89E1:1A66:9443:4B37 (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 5

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 5 Template:Cob


    (Posted) RD: Miguel Ángel Gómez Martínez

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Spanish conductor and composer who conducted from memory, holding leading positions in Europe (Vienna, Madrid, Valencia, Mannheim ...), and composed a Symphony in memory of the discovery of America. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    In this case updating meant pruning. The bulk of the article was added in one edit by an editor whose only edit that was: flowery language literally translated from Spanish, many references but many simply gone, and all (until he died) in Spanish with English titles and US dates ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) United States v. Google LLC (2020)

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate This is one of my first in the news nominations, but I think this is something that should be discussed on the Main Page. I don't think the article is sufficiently updated at this time, but I do anticipate that it will be soon. Awesome Aasim 02:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Oppose but only because we have no idea what the remedies are yet. If the court forces Alphabet to sell off Google, that might be somethiung, but if its just a multi-million dollar fine, that would be a slap on the wrist. — Masem (t) 02:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose because this lacks sufficient due weight for ITN, and is still playing out. Google will likely appeal the ruling, and the article needs more information.JohnAdams1800 (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose; this is still an ongoing event. While the ruling itself would be landmark and historical, it could still get overturned on appeal. We’d have to wait and see to make a final determination. Cheers! --WellThisIsTheReaper Grim 04:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose until there are consequences for Google, as per Masem. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    (Closed) Stock market decline

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

    • Oppose single day losses or gains aren't good ITN stories. If there was a week long trend of bad stock news, that might be sonething, but markets are always volitile and thus short term trends aren't really good for ITN. Masem (t) 18:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would argue this has been going on for several days, since the Department of Labor's report. The S&P 500 Index, for instance, has been falling. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Certainly made all markets voilitle but in the larger picture, just more wild swings and not massive corrections... Yet. Other pundants are saying this was expected for a long time due to lack of fed interest cut and the perception infinite growth could go on forever, so the market is now just correcting. Either way, we don't have a significant enough long term economic impact appropriate for ITN. Masem (t) 20:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support when article is improved. Economic news are underrepresented at ITN and this one is notable - global in nature, very much so in the news and historic as the largest one day loss. 2A02:8071:6362:54A0:549B:15AE:60C8:4E6 (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose. This currently this doesn't have enough due weight for ITN. This is an ongoing event and may be mooted if the stock market recovers, or the sell-off could continue and become a bigger story to potentially merit ITN. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 18:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose Hasn't been long enough to tell if this will mean anything yet. The article would need expansion anyway. Estreyeria (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment On Black Thursday, the decline was 11%. It closed high on Friday. The succeeding Monday and Tuesday had two more ~11% drops. Following that, much of the world plunged into a depression (I'm aware of the London crash and how reductive it is to claim the stock crash was the primary cause of the Depression; this is merely for comparison's sake). This is only one day, however, followed by an eerily similar good day. If the next two trading days have a comparable decline, I'll support. Sincerely, Dilettante 03:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose No evidence that this is more than your run of the mill market correction. We don't blurb that sort of thing even if it ends up foreshadowing a recession. The S&P 500's drop today was not even in the top twenty for one day declines. Japan's market drop is interesting but so far unclear what it's long term ramifications will be. And FWIW as of this comment the Nikkei Index is currently trading up around 10%. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose The article has been nominated for deletion and the nominator's reason was Template:Tq. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 11:16, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose The article is at Afd and the main impact of the event seems to be (as stated in the lead) the "heightening concerns of a recession" which I do not think is notable enough. Gödel2200 (talk) 12:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    (Posted) Hasina resigns

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Major news.User:Rushtheeditor (talk) 09:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Support because this is major news and alt blurb Sharier4 (talk) 13:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Huge news. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Incredibly important post. Greatder (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have removed the tag until such time as the drive-by tagger creates a TP section explaining why policy supports the tag they placed after this ITN/C was opened. Per BRD, they'll need to gain consensus to restore the tag.-- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 22:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The orange tag has been removed since no TP discussion was created concerning the tag. Perhaps the tagger could spend the time to explain themself on the TP. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 22:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • I moved the content about the more recent events that were put in the Controversies section up into the political career, as to meet my suggestion that there should be more there to explain why she fled the position (specifically her stance in the earlier protest). — Masem (t) 03:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) RD: Graham Thorpe

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate English cricketer. 240F:7A:6253:1:D008:3BBC:2CAE:D4B9 (talk) 07:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 4

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 4 Template:Cob


    RD: Duane Thomas

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Running back for the Dallas Cowboys. 240F:7A:6253:1:3433:C2D3:2DC9:5CFD (talk) 07:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Steve Kragthorpe

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate College football coach for Louisville and Tulsa. 240F:7A:6253:1:3433:C2D3:2DC9:5CFD (talk) 07:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Tsung-Dao Lee

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Article needs work. Staraction (talk | contribs) 16:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Shobhana Ranade

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Indian social worker. Ktin (talk) 23:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) Novak Djokovic wins gold medal

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate Novak's first gold at the Olympics. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 15:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oppose Covered by ongoing and something similar to this nominated a day ago was not posted Hungry403 (talk) 17:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    August 3

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 3 Template:Cob


    (Attention needed) RD: Pasi Ikonen

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    (Posted) RD: Yamini Krishnamurthy

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Indian classical dancer. Article meets minimum expectations for mainpage. Ktin (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) United Kingdom riots

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    Disrupstive event in a major country. -FelineHerder (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support altblurb, the event is very important but the racial/religious motivations here can't be ignored. Personisinsterest (talk) 22:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Gaining a lot of traction. Tons of coverage on the riot around the world, worth posting. Hungry403 (talk) 02:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support alt2; a significant event, and that blurb appears to best reflect the sources. BilledMammal (talk) 02:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No need. The current blurb is concise, and the link between these riots and immigration is extremely tenuous. 'Far right' much better characterises their overall nature. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "link between these riots and immigration is extremely tenuous" you have to be kidding me right? That's a main talking point of protesters. "stop the boats" "go home" "England for the English", you watch these protests and you'll hear all these. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 19:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: I think we are misinforming our readers by saying these riots have occurred "across the United Kingdom" in the blurb. The riots have been an almost exclusively English phenomenon, with only one relatively minor incident in Belfast. No riots have happened in Wales or Scotland, but that is what we're implying by saying these riots are happening "across the United Kingdom". --Grnrchst (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • 85% of the UK population lives in England. If the departments containing 85% of the population of France were rioting, would it be implying that the rioting was also happening in the other 15% if we says "protesters riot in France"? Unknown Temptation (talk) 14:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Different situation as the UK is a de facto federal state with four very distinct polities, unlike France which is quite centralised. However I don't think we should specify England as there is unrest occurring in the other nations. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        The UK isn't in any way a federal state. It's a highly centralised state with unequal devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Abcmaxx (talk) 14:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Closed) 100M

    [edit]

    Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

    Had a discussion about this in the talk pages and it being the biggest sports event in 4 years. Men's is tomorrow, but like tennis grand slams, we can just update it then.Sportsnut24 (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Abot

    (Posted) RD: Antônio Meneses

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Nominator's comments: last paragraph of "career" (about discography) just needs a couple of little cites, which should take anyone 5-10 minutes with Google's help. Otherwise it should be good to go. Zingarese talk · contribs (please Reply to icon mention me on reply; thanks!) 18:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    should be GTG now as far as citing is concerned. Let me know if there are any other problems. Zingarese talk · contribs (please Reply to icon mention me on reply; thanks!) 20:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Attention needed) 2024 Lido Beach attack

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    An article being featured in the current events portal has no bearing as to whether it should be posted as a blurb. Gödel2200 (talk) 19:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ElijahPepe one of the dealiest attack. QalasQalas (talk) 23:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 2

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 2 Template:Cob


    (Posted) RD: Galboda Gnanissara Thera

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Head priest and the chief incumbent of the Gangaramaya Temple in Colombo, Sri Lanka. 65.94.214.121 (talk) 05:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    August 1

    [edit]

    Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2024 August 1 Template:Cob


    (Posted) RD: Jürgen Ahrend

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate Influential internationally known organ builder, especially known for restoring Baroque organs such as Arp Schnitger's. The article was short in prose and detailed in list. Prose and referencing expanded. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Craig Shakespeare

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate English footballer and coach. 240F:7A:6253:1:D008:3BBC:2CAE:D4B9 (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Joyce Brabner

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate American comic book writer. 240F:7A:6253:1:A80D:4F7:9392:624C (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RD: Leonard Hayflick

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate American cell biologist.

    Personisinsterest (talk) 02:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Posted) American–Russian prisoner exchange

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    Specifically the altblurb, and would support a free image of the prisoners being released if possible Personisinsterest (talk) 15:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Let the record reflect that I comment on ITN most often to note U.S.-centric bias. I incorrectly assumed that the deal was between the U.S. and Russia at first, as well. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose per Masem Hungry403 (talk) 21:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support on notability, oppose on quality. As others have mentioned, the details on the prisoner exchange itself are lacking in prose. The article should be expanded upon before the blurb is posted. ArkHyena (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support on notability In fact, there is precedent to post these types of things; for instance, Brittney Griner's release was posted. And with this event having many more prisoners being exchanged than that one, this passes the bar of significance in my mind. Gödel2200 (talk) 00:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support on notability, oppose all current blurb options. A better blurb may be something along the lines of Russia released western journalists/political prisoners in exchange for releasing criminals held in western countries. Or similar. My wording is crap. There isn't a clear good short wording for this. But I agree with others that the blurb should not place undue emphasis on the US, given that from my reading 7 western countries were involved in the discussions for this exchange. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 04:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Most biased ITN i have ever seen AlexBobCharles (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support This is huge, and many prominent politicians and journalists are involved. Trepang2 (talk) 04:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support Major prisoner exchange between major countries in the major power blocks in the Second Cold War, historical and highly notable. --Gerrit CUTEDH 06:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment. There weren't 26 people released, only 24, other two on the plane being kids whose parents were detained in Slovenia. Regarding the sides of exchange, altblurb3 is the correct one, because seven countries participated. Maybe it makes sense to mention Germany explicitly, because the most important contribution was by Germany and it has received all but three people of those who were sent to the West. BilboBeggins (talk) 12:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment The photo should not be posted as it would be pro-US bias . Altblurb 3 is the best one
      I know , i meant for it be posted with no photo AlexBobCharles (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support blurb. The biggest prisoner exchange between West abd East since World War 2 [43]. In the news and analysed all over the world, the biggest news currently. The event is by no means trivial, as seven countries participated in swap, with Turkey serving as neutral party, and there were also difficulties in legal justification and abiding by law. This led to debate in Germany and may influence future of the governing coalition (because its members had varying opinions on thr issue). The situation is very complex and for sure there will be consequences, changes for bilateral relations between countries participating in the exchange, and more. BilboBeggins (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article quality has improved considerably and the title has been changed in view of the discussion. I think the consensus has shifted to support? Let me see some more feedback, then ready to post. --Tone 15:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support. Probably the last big international event of the year unless war breaks out between Iran and Israel. Count Iblis (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      -until war breaks out between Iran and Israel Personisinsterest (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support, in the news internationally and the article is in good shape. -- Tavix (talk) 16:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support highly notable and in relatively good quality, Editor 5426387 (talk) 16:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Posting. Feel free to add the picture. --Tone 17:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't feel the quality concerns raised early have been sufficiently addressed. Take out the background and list of people, and you have almost nothing of substance here and less than what we would normally expect. All the claims how this is that significant should be then easy to source to explain that by those making those claims, not just handwaving that factor. I am not going to ask for it to be pulled, but we have to make sure that what we are posting represent some of WP's best work since we're highlighting it on the main page. --Masem (t) 17:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        I agree. The posted blurb still emphasises the United States and treats the other countries involved as insignificant allies, i.e. puppets or stooges comparable with Belarus. This is not accurate or complete, as I understand it. The key prisoner was not Gershkovich, who is currently the primary focus of the article, but Krasikov who was the guy that Russia really wanted as he's a personal acquaintance or colleague of Putin. Krasikov was held by Germany and so their agreement was vital in getting the deal done. The Germans refused previously, holding out for a swap with Navalny and so it was his death that opened things up. The article doesn't explain this well and just seems to be cheer-leading for the US to make Biden and Harris look good. It comes across as blatant US propaganda. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        If not for Germany, the swap wouldn't have happened. So I agree with you. As I mentioned before, I also have issue with 26 released. If by ghat we mean that they were on planes, then yes. But many may understand this as if all 26 were released from prison, which is not the case. BilboBeggins (talk) 18:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        The blurb is now in play at WP:ERRORS so we have a multilateral situation. I just looked at the lead of the article and the only named people are Americans. The lead picture is American showing Americans and an American flag. There's then a section all about a particular American. The negotiations section then starts with a link to VP Harris. It's like the Simpsons when Homer chants USA! USA! But see WP:NPOV... Andrew🐉(talk) 18:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Gershkovich and Whelan were the only people initially confirmed. The image is the only public domain image pertaining to this. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Pull The article is nonsensically lop-sided. There's an entire massive paragraph about Gershkovich (why?), a paragraph about negotiations which should be titled "American negotiations", and the reactions section ... well, you get the picture. Practically nothing about Germany without who this wouldn't have happened at all. Black Kite (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The info from article in other languages may be added. BilboBeggins (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Pull The article is not ready for the main page, containing a fully unsourced background section. Gödel2200 (talk) 22:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I've dealt with the copyvio problems but this has just left a lot of the article unsourced. Black Kite (talk) 10:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Post-posting support The article was put together pretty quickly given how fast the news developed. It can be continually improved. This is the largest prisoner exchange since the Cold War, possibly ever. Posting it was the right call. Pats2017 (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Pats2017 (talk)[reply]
      • There is no timeliness factor for ITN posting. Quality must be established before it is posted, and even at the current state, the substance of the article (the negotations of the trade) are barely discussed. --Masem (t) 00:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        <<There is no timeiness factor for ITN posting>>
        Not my point. The point is that it's a huge story that people going to Wikipedia will look for. And as for quality, we of course want a high-quality article. As I said, it can always be revised and improved. But even if it can use improvement the magnitude of the story merits consideration for WP:IAR. The item has been posted and should remain so.Pats2017 (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Pats2017[reply]
        Quality is a non-negotiable requirement for any article linked as a featured one from the Main Page, since those are supposed to represent some of WP's best work. We don't IAR quality for timeliness. And if readers aren't seeing a news story they thing might be in the ITN box, its why we also include the Current Events portal to help further while the article may be improved. --Masem (t) 01:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        We've routinely put stories up before that weren't the best quality--we do it all the time for sporting events, award ceremonies, elections.
        You may disagree with me about what qualifies our "best work," but In The News always represents our best work that we could post in a timely manner, give that we have at most seven days before items become stale. There are always comments in the Talk Page about how an "article is good enough" to post (You can scroll down the current ITN Talk Page for at least three instances.)
        I can understand the case for Pulling an item that clearly doesn't meet ITN criteria on signficance (for example, the Beatles "new hit song" item that got posted and then--correctly imho--pulled a while back). But this is clearly a ITN-worthy item that affects at least seven nations and has a profound impact. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Pulling the item back at this point is silly. Pats2017 (talk) 01:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        We do not post things like awards, sports results, or elections without the article being at least a reasonably complete state within the hours or days after that has completed. For new news events, there is a reasonable expectation of what could be included. For this prisoner trade, there are several articles (now? maybe not 24-48 hrs ago) that have significant deals - far more than what our current article's two paragraphs fail to properly summarize. That's the type of expection we want to those non-routine events. Same applies to disaster articles; we don't post until we know we have a sufficient amount of detail about the event itself. We're not expecting completeness, and things can change and be added after posting, but the initial post needs to be of a certain level that shows the article is trending towards meeting all core content policies and thus appropriate for an encyclopedia, not just regurgitating the news. For example, there's still what seems to be underselling of the Germany role in these negotiations, which makes this still an NPOV issue. --Masem (t) 02:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Fair point re:Germony, but it doesn't nullify my point that every article currently on the ITN board got the "article is good enough" seal of consensus on the Talk Page prior to posting. The prisoner swap article also needs improvement and will continue to be revised.
        Don't make perfect the enemy of good. There's no need to pull the article. Just keep working roward making it better. Pats2017 (talk) 02:28, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Assassination of Mohammed Deif

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    Wait, until more evidence comes out let’s hold off on posting. Dudes article has a few CN tags. Ion.want.uu (talk) 12:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean, they said that on the first day. Seeing as there's no more evidence and that this is denied by Hamas, I don't think we can post this Personisinsterest (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hamas has not confirmed or denied the death. We can wait until then to decide whether to post. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 13:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Halla Tómasdóttir becomes president

    [edit]

    Template:ITN candidate

    Several things to comment. First, Iceland is a parliamentary republic and its head of state has no executive powers. Consequently, it is not ITNR. Secondly, I would wait for the official inauguration. And, thirdly, the presidential election was two months ago, so the main article cannot be the one about the election because it is stale and should be the one about Tómasdóttir. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    For some reason I got the months wrong. Amended now. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    thanks! The problem now is that it's a short biography. The articles in Icelandic and Italian have more content with sources. The articles may help to expand on this. _-_Alsor (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose we didn't include the Icelandic election, therefore we shouldn't include the swearing in. Scu ba (talk) 11:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually if we missed the Icelandic elections this is a good opportunity to remedy this and post. Abcmaxx (talk) 12:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Correct. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No. We didn’t miss the Icelandic election. It was put up as a cannidate. The result of the discussion was to not post it since 1) it’s Iceland and 2) the office of president is ceremonial and 3) we haven’t posted an Icelandic presidential election before. Scu ba (talk) 13:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I wasn't aware of the previous discussion but none of those seem like a good reason on their own to oppose: 1. Iceland is a fully sovereign state, and isn't a micronation by any means; its relatively small population should not really be a discriminating factor. 2. It's ceremonial in many states, and the president is still a representative of the nation with political influence 3. That does not mean it cannot ever be posted. Abcmaxx (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't get me wrong, I agree, Iceland's results should've been included in the news, but it wasn't. We don't include swearing ins so we shouldn't break precedent here. Scu ba (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support to compensate for missing the Icelandic election, as per Abcmaxx. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 15:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose, wait for inauguration Personisinsterest (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]