Wikipedia:Peer review/Eminem discography/archive1

Eminem discography

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for December 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I intend to bring the article to Featured List status after the unsuccessful FLC of a few months ago. I believe I have addressed all the issue that were brought up and fixed other problems, especially those regarding the reliability of the former sources and unnecessary large amount of charts. I would like comments on anything that can be improved, but especially comments regarding the lead and the "note system" at the bottom of the page are most welcome.

Thanks, — Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 09:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Cannibaloki (talk · contribs): This is a partial assessment of layout, not yet seen the text.

All these types, on the entire table, per visual appeal should be in a consistent 'width' and same style.

Done

Overall, you should put the entire list as the others featured lists, look at my page, to see a modern days FL. Preference to see The Mars Volta and Iron Maiden discogs.

Now it looks more similar

Put all fonts in normal size (except bottom keys).

Done, with the exception for guest performers in the singles chart.

When you has more than 10 chart peaks, keep the 10 bests, as MOS:DISCOG suggests.

Done (all but the singles table have 10 charts)

For the external links like: australian-charts.com should be replaced by Discography Eminem; In the same system that can be found in the discography of Trivium; Will give you less work, and reduce the list weight.

Good Idea. Done

If you prefer, I can make the suggested changes without any problems.
- Did I miss anything?
  - Nothing, all done. Canniba loki 13:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regards, Canniba loki 03:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments! Is there anything I missed or that you would like to see further improved? — Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 12:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All codes that I post here, should replace the ones used in the discography.

! rowspan="2" width="125"| [[Music recording sales certification|Certifications]]<br /><small>([[List of music recording sales certifications|sales thresholds]])</small>
- Only on the first ocurrence, the following should be just Certifications (with no links).

Done

! style="width:3em;font-size:75%;"| [[Billboard 200|US]]<br /><ref>The current references, of course.</ref> (for all similar entries)

Done

It would be nice if Worldwide, was shortened to WW, but this means World War, then forget it.
"—" denotes releases that did not chart or were not released in that country.

"—" means that the album or song did not chart.

The Singles is a compilation album or a box set?
- Should be moved for a Box sets section, and put a notes explain something as its content or other stuff.

To be fair, a box set is a compilation album which is released in various discs. For that matter, then even Curtain Call: The Hits should be moved to a greatest hits section.— Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 11:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You will find information about the Australian Top DVD charts at ARIA report (see MOS:DISCOG).

Done

***I will work on all of this once I come back home. Thanks 19:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC) Well, I guess I'm back. Anything I missed?— Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 11:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]